IMR Press / CEOG / Volume 42 / Issue 5 / DOI: 10.12891/ceog1922.2015

Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology (CEOG) is published by IMR Press from Volume 47 Issue 1 (2020). Previous articles were published by another publisher on a subscription basis, and they are hosted by IMR Press on imrpress.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with S.O.G.

Case Report
Isthmocele in a retroflexed uterus: a report of an unrecognized case
Show Less
1 Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Molecular Imaging, Interventional Radiology and Radiation Therapy, University Hospital Tor Vergata, Rome
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tor Vergata University, Rome (Italy)
Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015, 42(5), 705–707; https://doi.org/10.12891/ceog1922.2015
Published: 10 October 2015
Abstract

The term “isthmocele” refers to a niche on the anterior wall of the uterine isthmus or of the cervical canal at the site of a previous cesarean delivery scar. Such anatomic defect can cause many gynecologic sequelae that only recently have being identified and described. Hysteroscopy is commonly considered the gold standard for the diagnosis and also for the treatment, at least in the case of defects of small size. The authors described the case of a 37-year-old woman who underwent a cesarean section (CS) seven years before, with a long lasting history of menstrual irregularities, and pelvic pain increasing during menstruation at the hypogastric level. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed an exceptionally large isthmocele on the anterior wall of a retroflexed uterus which was otherwise misinterpreted as the uterine cavity filled with menstrual blood during a previous hysteroscopy (HSC). Although exceptional, this case highlights the possibility that a large sized isthmocele in a retroflexed uterus could be misinterpreted as the uterine cavity filled by menstrual blood at HSC. In this case MRI definitely clarified the diagnosis.
Keywords
Isthmocele
Magnetic resonance imaging
Retroflexed uterus
Hysteroscopy
Share
Back to top