1. Introduction
p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) (, ,
and ) are encoded by four different genes in four different chromosomes
[1]. p38 MAPKs are dual-phosphorylated on tyrosine and threonine residues within
a conserved Thr-Pro-Tyr (TPY) motif by MAPK kinase 3 (MKK3) and/or MKK6, which in
turn phosphorylate a substrate typically containing a ST/P motif (Ser or Thr
residue, followed by Pro [1]). p38 and p38 phosphorylate more
than 100 substrates [2], and many of them are not phosphorylated by p38
and p38 that have specific and non-overlapping substrates and are
therefore called alternative p38 MAPKs [3, 4, 5]. Although distinct substrates
may play a role in an isoform-specific effect of p38 MAPKs, how p38 MAPK family
members signal via common and unique substrates are largely unknown [2, 4]. We
will review recent discoveries from genetic studies about isoform-specific and
cell/tissue-dependent effects of p38 MAPKs in inflammation and in
inflammation-associated oncogenesis and discuss potentials of targeting a
specific p38 isoform in therapeutic intervention.
p38 is expressed universally in all tissues and/or cells, whereas
other p38 family proteins are only detectable in certain tissues and/or cells [1, 2]. Although all p38 MAPKs can be activated similarly in response to
inflammation, stress and oncogenic signaling, they can also be activated
distinctively [1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9]. Oncogene RAS, for example, stimulates
p38 (also called p38) phosphorylation but increases RNA/protein levels
of p38 (and not other p38 MAPKs), indicating that p38 MAPKs are
activated by Ras oncogene by an isoform-specific mechanism [6, 7, 10, 11, 12].
Furthermore, elevated p38 gene expression was demonstrated in human
breast, colon, and pancreatic cancers, which is correlated with decreased patient
survival, indicating its potential roles in malignant development and progression
in clinic [9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15]. In addition, treatment of mice with the
inflammation stimulus dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) preferably stimulates
p38 phosphorylation (as compared to p38) in intestinal
epithelial tissues/cells [16], whereas p38 (to a less extent for
p38) is predominantly activated by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) [17] and
tumor necrosis factor (TNF) [18]. In patients with chronic inflammation
(arthritis), however, p38 and p38, but not other p38s, are
both activated [19]. A distinct activation-pattern of p38 family proteins by
different stimuli may play an important role in their different biological
outcomes and an elevated p38 RNA/protein in Ras-transformed cells and
in cancers indicates its potential as a sustainable therapeutic target for
pharmacological intervention.
p38 family MAPK proteins also differently activate their downstream substrates
such as kinases and transcription factors [2, 4]. Several kinases, including p38
regulated/activated kinase (PRAK), and mitogen-activated protein
kinase–interacting kinase 1 (MNK1), are phosphorylated by p38 and/or
p38 in vitro and in cells, but not by other p38 isoforms,
whereas MAP kinase-activated protein kinase 2 (MK2) is activated by all p38
family proteins [1, 4]. Transcription factors myocyte enhancer factor 2C (MEF2C)
and activating transcription factor-2 (ATF2) are activated by all p38 family
proteins [3, 4]. Although c-Jun is activated by p38 and p38,
this occurs via distinct mechanism: c-Jun is activated by p38 through
phosphorylation of the AP-1 partner proteins Sap-1 and ATF2 [1] but
activated by p38 via AP-1-dependent transcription [20, 21, 22]. The
different effects of p38 family proteins on downstream kinases and transcription
factors may play an important role in their isoform-specific and
cell/tissue-dependent activities.
p38 protein has a unique structure among p38 family proteins, which
may determine its capacity to phosphorylate a specific substrate and to signal
via a specific pathway through interacting with different proteins [1, 15, 23, 24]. Specifically, p38 C-terminal contains a PDZ-binding motif that
interacts with PDZ-domain containing proteins including its substrate SAP90 [25]
and its phosphatase protein tyrosine phosphatase H1 (PTPH1) [11, 15]. Moreover,
PDZ motif is required for p38 to interact with c-Jun in cells [20],
which may be important for p38 to activate AP-1-dependent gene
transcription, including c-Jun, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP9) [20], Nanog [21],
and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) [22]. Furthermore, p38
depends on PDZ motif to bind, phosphorylate and activate PTPH1 [26], which is
important for PTPH1 to catalyze EGFR dephosphorylation and to promote
KRAS-dependent growth [22, 27]. In addition, p38 binds and/or
phosphorylates several proliferative proteins, including DNA topoisomerase
II (Topo II) and estrogen receptor (ER) in breast
cancer [8, 9], heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) and -catenin in colon
cancer [13, 16], and glucose transporter 2 (Glut2) and
phosphofructokinase-2/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase 3 (PFKFB3) in pancreatic cancer
[12]. It is not known, however, if PDZ binding is directly and indirectly
involved in p38 interacting with this group of proliferative proteins.
These results together indicate that p38 may execute its oncogenic
activity through interaction with other proliferative proteins dependent and
independent of PDZ binding [28].
2. Effects of p38/ knockout on inflammation and
inflammation-associated oncogenesis
Cell culture studies showed p38 inhibits Ras proliferative activity in
NIH3T3 fibroblasts by negative feedback in which transient transfection of
oncogenic Ras (HRAS) stimulates phosphorylation of each member of the
co-transfected p38 pathway MKK6 (MAPK kinase 6), p38, and
PRAK (p38-related/activated protein kinase)/MAPK-activated protein kinase 2
(MK2), which in turn suppresses Ras proliferative response [6]. The p38
suppressive activity on Ras oncogene was further demonstrated pharmacologically
in intestinal epithelial cells (IEC) in which Ras-dependent soft-agar growth was
increased by treatment with the p38/ inhibitor SB203586 [29].
Moreover, the p38 upstream activator MKK6 and down-stream kinase PRAK and MK2
were further shown to suppress Ras proliferative activity and/or Ras-induced
transformation in different in vitro and in vivo systems [6, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35], although recent MK2 knockout studies showed its
promoting role in colitis-associated cancer [36]. These results together indicate
that the p38 pathway activities in target cells (fibroblasts and
epithelial cells) are inhibitory to Ras proliferative activity and oncogenic
transformation in cell culture [7] (Table 1, Ref. [12, 16, 34, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64]).
Table 1.Effects of knockout of p38 MAPKs on inflammation and
inflammation-associated oncogenesis.
p38 knockout (KO) |
Major phenotype |
Reference |
(inducible KO) |
increased lung tumorigenesis |
[37] |
|
(KRAS) |
|
(KO in MEFs) |
increased transformation by |
[38] |
|
Ras and other oncogenes |
|
(inducible KO in MSCs) |
increased xenograft growth co-injected with |
[39] |
|
p38α-deleted mesenchymal stromal cells |
|
|
(MSCs) |
|
liver-specific KO |
increased liver tumorigenesis |
[40] |
|
(Den-induced) |
|
IEC-specific KO |
increased colitis (DSS) |
[41] |
myeloid-specific KO |
decreased colitis (DSS) |
|
myeloid-specific KO |
decreased colitis-associated tumorigenesis |
[42] |
|
(AOM/DSS) |
|
IEC-specific KO |
increased colitis and colitis-associated cancer |
[43] |
|
(CAC) (AOM/DSS) |
|
IEC-specific KO* |
biphasic; increased colon tumorigenesis early |
[44] |
|
and decreased tumor growth later |
|
Alveolar epithelial type II* |
biphasic, increased tumorigenesis early |
[45] |
(AE II-specific KO) |
and decreased tumor formation later (KRAS) |
|
myeloid-specific KO |
decreased skin inflammation to SDS |
[46] |
|
increase skin inflammation to UVB |
|
|
increased skin inflammation to TPA |
|
keratinocyte specific KO |
decreased skin inflammation to UVB |
[45] |
DC specific KO |
no effect on skin inflammation to UVB |
|
keratinocyte specific KO |
increased skin inflammation to LPS/TPA |
[48] |
myeloid specific KO |
increased skin inflammation to LPS/TPA |
|
DC specific KO |
decreased skin inflammation to LPS/TPA |
|
T cell specific KO |
decreased skin inflammation to LPS/TPA |
|
Hepatic-specific KO |
increased liver tumorigenesis |
[49] |
|
(Den-induced) |
|
T cell specific KO |
increased adoptive immunotherapy |
[50] |
(CRISPR-Cas9) |
increased anti-tumor activity of T cells |
|
(inducible) & |
decreased lung metastatic of melanoma |
[51] |
Fibroblasts-specific KO |
decreased lung metastatic of melanoma |
|
Fibroblast-specific KO |
decreased lung tumorigenesis (KRAS model) |
[52] |
DC-specific KO |
decreased T-17 cell differentiation and |
[53] |
|
decreased IL-23/IL-6 expression |
|
DC-specific KO |
decreased colitis/colon tumors (AOM/DSS), |
[54] |
|
increased JNK, IL-10, IFN- and |
|
|
decreased IL-6, TNF, IL-1, and IL-17 |
|
Macrophage specific KO |
decreased LPS-induced TNFα, IL-12 and IL-18 |
[55] |
Macrophage specific KO |
decreased colitis in IL-10 mice |
[56] |
Keratinocyte-specific KO |
decreased skin inflammation (to UVB) |
|
MKK3/6 in CD4T cells |
decreased IL-17 |
[57] |
p38α dn Tg in CD4T cells |
decreased IL-17 |
|
MKK3/6 in MEFs |
increased xenograft in immortalized cells |
[34] |
p38 |
No studies reported |
|
p38 |
|
|
|
decreased TNFα, IL- and IL-10 |
[58] |
|
in response to LPS |
|
** |
decreased colon tumorigenesis |
[59] |
|
when combined with p38δ (AOM/DSS) |
|
** |
decreased skin tumorigenesis |
[60] |
|
when combined with p38δ (DMBA/TPA) |
|
|
slowed T-cell differentiation |
[61] |
|
(p38 more affects in CD4/CD8 cells) |
|
|
(p38δ more affects in CD4/CD8 cells) |
|
IEC-specific KO |
decreased colitis and CAC |
[16] |
|
(AOM/DSS model) |
|
Hepatic-specific KO |
Decreased liver tumorigenesis |
[62] |
|
(Den model) |
|
pancreas-specific KO |
Decreased pancreatic tumorigenesis |
[12] |
|
(KPC model) |
|
p38δ |
|
|
|
decreased skin tumorigenesis |
[63] |
|
(DMBA model) |
|
** |
decreased colon tumorigenesis |
[59] |
|
When combined with p38 |
|
|
(AOM/DSS model) |
|
** |
decreased skin tumorigenesis |
[60] |
|
when combined with p38 (DMBA/TPA) |
|
|
decreased mammary tumorigenesis |
[64] |
|
(PyMT model) |
|
The global knockout is indicated by a sign “”, whereas conditional
knockout (KO) is shown as cell/tissue-specific KO through the Cre recombinase
technology. Tumors were induced by transgenic expression of the indicated
oncogene and/or by treatment of mice with the indicated carcinogen
inflammation stimuli (please see details in the indicated references).
indicates a biphasic effect with enhanced tumorigenesis by
inducible p38 conditional KO during tumor initiation and with decreased
tumor growth and/or metastasis after tumor established, and shows
similar phenotypes in p38 KO and p38 KO mice, which is more
substantial in their double KO mice. Effects of p38 in experimental and
clinic cancer were recently reviewed [74] and results from this table are
summarized in Table 2. |
Systemic effects of p38 in inflammation and in inflammation-associated
oncogenesis have been investigated by knockout (KO) studies in mice. Because
global p38 KO is embryonic lethal [65, 66], inducible and/or
conditional p38 KO was developed. Specific p38 KO in
macrophages leads to changes in pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF, IL-6, and
anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 in bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDM) in a
manner dependent of stimuli and of treatment time, which is blocked by IL-10
antibody, indicating a proinflammatory response [56]. Further, myeloid
p38 KO decreases colitis, inhibits colitis-associated cancer (CAC)
[42], and prolongs survival of IL-10 mice, indicating that myeloid
p38 is pro-inflammatory and oncogenic [56]. A pro-inflammatory role of
p38 is also demonstrated by a decrease in 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene
(DNFB)-induced ear swelling in mice with p38 KO in dendritic cells
(DCs) and in T cells, although myeloid-specific p38 KO had an opposite
effect [48]. Moreover, p38 KO in DCs inhibits dextran sodium sulfate
(DSS)-induced colitis and attenuates DSS/azoxymethane (AOM)-induced CAC in
association with decreased neutrophil infiltration and with changes in multiple
cytokines in colon tissues [54], further indicating the pro-inflammatory and
oncogenic role of p38 in immune cells (Fig. 1). This conclusion is
further supported by decreased lethality in mice after the treatment with
lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in which p38 is specifically deletion in
macrophage in association with reduced blood levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines
TNF, IL-12, and IL-18 [55]. Moreover, there is attenuated colitis and decreased
inflammatory cytokine expression (after DSS) in mice with myeloid-specific
p38 KO [41]. Myeloid p38 is also important for DSS-induced
skin inflammation [46] and p38 KO in DCs, but not in macrophages or T
cells, inhibits T17 differentiation, decreases IL-17 levels, and suppresses
autoimmune inflammation [67]. In addition, inhibition of p38 activity
by expressing a dominant negative (dn) mutant in CD4 T cells decreases IL-17
expression and reduces the severity of allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE) [57].
Studies with a CRISPR-Cas9 screening of primary T cells further showed that
p38 deletion increases the efficacy of mouse anti-tumor T cells [50, 68], thus demonstrating an oncogenic role of p38 in T cells. A recent
study further showed that p38 activity (the phospho-p38/total
p38 ratio) in leukocytes isolated from the patient peripheral blood
with metastatic melanoma is increased as compared to those without metastasis,
and predicts decreased patient survival, and that p38 KO specifically
in fibroblasts attenuates lung metastasis of melanoma in mice [51]. Moreover,
specific deletion of p38 from fibroblasts also inhibits KRAS-induced
lung tumorigenesis [52]. These results together indicate that p38
activity in stromal cells (immune cells and fibroblasts) overall is
pro-inflammatory and/or oncogenic [48, 54, 67] (Fig. 1) (Tables 1,2).
Fig. 1.
p38 (, , , and )
family proteins regulate inflammation and inflammation-associated oncogenesis by
isoform-specific and cell/tissue-dependent mechanism. p38 activity in
immune cells is mostly proinflammatory and oncogenic while in epithelial cells
(and other target cells such as MEFs) is anti-inflammatory and tumor suppressive.
p38 and p38 activity in immune and epithelial cells is both
proinflammatory and oncogenic. * Biphasic effects of inducible p38 KO
in intestinal epithelial cells and in lung epithelial projector cells, i.e.,
p38 is a tumor suppressor in cancer initiation stage but is oncogenic
in advanced stage likely via tumor-stromal interactions. No p38 studies
on inflammation and/or cancer have been reported. ** Only studies of conditional
p38 and combined p38/p38 KO in myeloid cells were
reported.
Table 2.Summary of p38 MAPKs in inflammation and cancer.
|
Pro-inflammatory |
Anti-inflammatory |
Tumor-suppressive |
Oncogenic |
Oncogenic |
Others |
Knockout |
Epithelial |
Immune cells |
Epithelial |
Immune cells |
Epithelial |
Immune cells |
Epithelial |
Immune cells |
Fibroblast |
p38 |
|
X* |
X |
X* |
X |
|
|
X |
X |
|
p38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
? |
p38 |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
p38 |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
*Response differs in a stimulus- and cell/tissue-specific manner. |
Studies with specific p38 KO in epithelial cells in which tumor
develops, however, showed that p38 is anti-inflammatory with a tumor
suppressor activity [41, 40, 49, 43, 44]. Experiments in mice with intestinal
epithelial cell (IEC)-specific p38 KO, for example, showed increased
IEC proliferation, enhanced colitis severity and/or colon tumorigenesis after the
treatment with DSS azoxymethane (AOM) as compared to control mice [41, 43, 44]. An increase in the carcinogen diethyl nitrosamine (DEN)-induced liver
tumorigenesis was also observed in mice with hepatic-specific p38 KO
[40, 49]. Moreover, studies in H-Ras-transformed or immortalized fibroblasts
showed increased in vivo xenograft formation of mouse embryonic
fibroblasts (MEFs) lacking p38 [38] and its activator MKK3 and MKK6
[34]. Moreover, experiments with inducible p38 global knockout revealed
that p38 KO increases lung stem cell proliferation and KRAS-induced
lung tumorigenesis [37]. In addition, co-injection of p38-deleted
mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) increases xenograft growth of human colon cancer
cells in nude mice in association with enhanced angiogenesis [39]. However,
inhibition of p38 nuclear translocation by a peptide attenuates
AOM/DSS-induced colon cancer, likely through targeting p38 in multiple
cell-types and tissues [69]. These results together indicate that p38
activity in target cells (epithelial, fibroblasts) and in co-injected MSCs is
anti-inflammatory and/or tumor-suppressive in response to carcinogen,
inflammation stimulus and/or RAS oncogene (Fig. 1).
Recent studies further showed that inducible p38 KO at a late stage in
intestinal epithelial cells (65 days after AOM/DSS administration to induce colon
tumor) and in alveolar epithelial progenitor cells (20 weeks after induction of
KRAS expression in lungs) decreases tumorigenesis, despite the initial
increase in tumorigenesis in both tissues [44, 45]. Mechanisms involved however
are mostly unclear and may involve epithelial p38 signaling interaction
with stromal once tumor reaches a certain size [52, 70]. This speculation is
supported by the fact that p38 silencing in pancreatic cancer cells
inhibits the cell growth in vitro but increases the xenograft
formation of the same cells in mice [71] and that p38 in fibroblasts
promotes lung metastasis of melanoma [51] and lung tumorigenesis [52]. These
results indicate a stage-specific role of epithelial p38 in
tumorigenesis and metastasis likely through signaling interactions with stromal
tissues. Although studies also showed a distinct role of p38 vs
p38 in cell survival and cell death [71, 72], p38 is generally
believed to be redundant and its global KO did not show major phenotypes [73].
These results together indicate that p38 in epithelial cells has a dual
role in oncogenesis, i.e., anti-inflammatory as a tumor suppressor at the tumor
initiation but oncogenic once tumor is established or becomes metastatic (Fig. 1)
(Tables 1,2).
3. Effects of p38/ knockout on inflammation and
inflammation-associated oncogenesis
Genetic studies showed that mice with global p38 and/or p38
knockout are phenotypically normal, which however results in a decrease in
multiple cytokines in response to lipopolysaccharide [LPS, a toll-like receptor 4
(TLR4) ligand] in bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDM) [58, 75]. Although
global p38 knockout alone has no significant effect on
7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA)/tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate
(TPA)-induced skin tumorigenesis as compared with wild-type (WT) mice, there is
attenuated tumorigenesis in p38 KO mice with a more substantial effect
in mice with its combined KO with p38 [60]. In colon cancer studies,
p38 and p38 global KO has no major impact on chronic
inflammation but decreases acute inflammation in intestine tissues in response to
DSS [59]. Moreover, mice with myeloid-specific p38 and/or p38
KO are resistant to diet-induced fatty liver, hepatic triglyceride, and glucose
intolerance in association with defective migration of neutrophils to the damaged
liver [76]. Analyses of global p38 and/or p38 KO mice further
showed that p38 and p38 KO differentially regulates T cell
differentiation at different stages as compared with WT mice [61]. Separate
studies showed that both myeloid-specific and global p38 KO decreased
alveolar neutrophil accumulation and attenuated acute lung injury [77], whereas
combined p38/p38 myeloid-specific and global KO protects mice
against fungal infection and inhibits leukocyte recruitment to infected kidneys
[78]. These results together indicate that systemic p38 and
p38 activity and their signaling in immune cells (only KO data
available in myeloid cells) are mostly pro-inflammatory and/or oncogenic (Fig. 1).
Recent genetic studies in mouse cancer models further showed that systemic and
epithelial p38 in gastrointestinal (GI) system is essential for
tumorigenesis. Global p38 and p38 KO attenuates
colitis-associated cancer (CAC) with their combined KO having more significant
effects than either alone, indicating a cooperative oncogenic activity of
systemic p38 and p38 [59]. Moreover, IEC-specific
p38 KO alone decreases pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-1
and TNF), inhibits the -catenin/Wnt pathway in colonic tissues, and
attenuates DSS-induced colitis and AOM/DSS-induced CAC [16]. Importantly, oral
application of a p38 selective pharmacological inhibitor pirfenidone
(PFD) [79, 80] depends on epithelial p38 to decrease p38
phosphorylating its substrates and to reduce cytokine’s levels in tumor tissues,
and to inhibit tumorigenesis, suggesting a novel strategy to block colon
tumorigenesis by targeting epithelial p38 [16]. p38 was
further shown to phosphorylate RB and to drive cell cycle progression, and
hepatic p38 KO and systemic application of PFD both block diethyl
nitrosamine (DEN)-induced liver tumorigenesis [62]. Our recent studies further
showed that p38 mediates KRAS oncogene signaling to activate the
glycolytic pathway in pancreatic ductal cancer cells (Pdac) and that specific
p38 KO in pancreatic epithelial cells inhibits pancreatitis, reduces
cytokine levels, and decreases pancreatic tumorigenesis in KPC mice [12].
Moreover, epithelial p38 is required for PFD to suppress glycolytic
pathways, to block pancreatic tumorigenesis in KPC mice, and to inhibit Pdac
xenograft growth [12]. Together, these results demonstrate that epithelial
p38 is essential for colon, liver and pancreatic tumorigenesis and its
pharmacological inhibitor PFD may have therapeutic potentials to block their
development, growth, and progression (Fig. 1) (Tables 1,2).
Studies also showed that p38 is required for tumorigenesis in certain
tissues. An early study showed that global p38 KO blocks
DMBA/TPA-induced skin tumorigenesis [63]. Studies from Cuenda lab further showed
that global p38 KO alters expression of several cytokines in response
to DSS [59]. Although combined global p38/p38 KO appears to
achieve more substantial effects in regulating cytokines and in inhibiting CAC
than either alone in DSS/AOM mouse model, analyses of chimeric mice of WT with
p38/p38 animals revealed a critical role of
hematopoietic, but not epithelial, p38/p38 in regulation of
inflammatory mediators and immune cell recruitment [59]. A protective effect of
global p38 KO on DMBA/TPA-induced skin tumorigenesis was observed in
association with decreased cytokines and chemokines in skin tissues, which are
further enhanced in p38/ double KO mice [60]. A recent study
further showed that conditional knockout of p38 in mammary epithelial
cells decreases the viral oncogene PyMT-induced breast tumorigenesis in mice
[64]. These results together indicate that systemic and epithelial p38,
as in the case with p38, is pro-inflammatory and oncogenic (Fig. 1)
(Tables 1,2).
4. Implications of cell/tissue-type dependent and isoform-specific
effects of p38 MAPKs in inflammation and in inflammation-associated oncogenesis
Mechanisms for cell/tissue-dependent and isoform-specific roles of p38 family
proteins in inflammation and inflammation-associated oncogenesis are largely
unknown. Although different p38 MAPK isoforms may regulate different sets of
inflammation mediators and/or different groups of downstream molecules in
response to different stimuli and/or in different cells/tissues, there is still a
lack of experimental evidence to support this hypothesis. While it is difficult
to systemically compare intrinsic activities of p38 family proteins in immune
cells due to lack of genetic evidence, p38 and p38 in
epithelial cells appear to be antagonistic. This effect has been observed at the
level of protein, cell, and disease. At protein level, for example, p38
and p38 both phosphorylate the tumor suppressor Rb at different sites
leading to an opposite effect on cell-cycle progression. Specifically,
p38 phosphorylates Rb at S807/S811 and stimulates G1/S transition [62],
whereas p38 phosphorylates Rb at S429/T252 and slows cell-cycle
progression [81]. Although Rb phosphorylation at these different sites is not
known to be sufficient to trigger the opposite effect on cell-cycle progression,
this mechanism may contribute to the tumor suppressor activity of p38
and oncogenic activity of p38. At cellular level, we showed an
antagonizing effect of p38 and p38 in stress response and in
KRAS transformation in which p38 transfection directly depletes
cellular p38 protein by a ubiquitination-dependent mechanism [82] and
that inhibition of p38 activity with SB203580 increases p38
protein levels [20]. At disease level, increased p-p38 in pancreatic
cancer tissues couples with increased patient’s survival, indicating its
tumor-suppressive activity [83], whereas upregulated p38 in the same
cancer predicts decreased patient survival, suggesting its oncogenic effect [12].
Thus, p38 and p38 can antagonize each other toward a protein
substrate in stress or oncogene-induced cellular outcome and in clinical cancer
development and progression. This cross-restrained activity of p38 and
p38 could complicate therapeutic gain when their isoform-specific
pharmacological inhibitors are used in systemic intervention. Please see recent
outstanding reviews about p38 MAPKs and inhibitors [2, 84].
Cell/tissue-specific effects of p38 family proteins will also have important
implications for using their pharmacological inhibitors to regulate inflammation
and inflammation-driven oncogenesis systemically. Although p38 in
immune cells is pro-inflammatory, application of its inhibitor SB203580 does not
improve clinical symptoms of DSS-induced colitis in mice [41]. This might occur
as an integration of its inhibition of pro-inflammatory p38 activity in
immune system and of its blockade of anti-inflammatory effect of p38 in
intestinal epithelial cells (Fig. 1) [41]. These experimental results are
consistent with a poor outcome of clinical trials using an oral p38
inhibitor BIRB in the treatment of Crohn’ disease [85]. On the other hand,
p38 activity in immune cells and in epithelial cells is both
pro-inflammatory and oncogenic (Fig. 1) and its inhibitor PFD therefore showed a
significant and consistent inhibitory effect on inflammation and
inflammation-associated oncogenesis as observed in mouse models of colon, liver,
and pancreatic cancer [12, 16, 62]. Considering of cell/tissue-dependent and
isoform-specific effects of p38 family proteins is therefore critical for
development of effective small molecular p38 inhibitors against inflammation and
inflammation-driven cancer in therapeutic intervention.
Abbreviations
AOM, azoxymethane; ATF2, activating transcription factor-2; BMDM, bone
marrow-derived macrophages; DMBA, 12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene; DCs, dendritic
cells; DNFB, 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene; DSS, dextran sulfate sodium; EGFR,
epidermal growth factor receptor; ER, estrogen receptor ; Hsp90, heat
shock protein 90 alpha; IEC, intestinal epithelial cell; “”, global
deletion; KO, knockout; MAPKs, mitogen-activated protein kinases; MEFs, mouse
embryonic fibroblasts; MEF2C, myocyte enhancer factor 2C; MKK3 or 6, MAPK kinase
3 and/or 6; MMP9, matrix metalloproteinase; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; KPC,
LSL-Kras: LSL-Trp53: Pdx1-Cre
mice; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; p38 MAPK, MAPK14;
p38, MAPK11; p38, MAPK12; p38, MAPK13; PRAK, p38
regulated/activated kinase; MK2, MAP kinase-activated protein kinase 2; MNK1,
mitogen-activated protein kinase-interacting kinase 1; PFKFB3,
phosphofructokinase-2/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase 3; PTPH1, protein tyrosine
phosphatase H1; PyMT, polyomavirus middle T antigen; TPA,
12-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate; WT, wild-type.
Author contributions
JZQ, GC—concept development and manuscript writing; HX, XMQ—discussion of
the manuscript and figure preparation.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Acknowledgment
We are very grateful to former Chen’s lab members for their contributions to the
research work.
Funding
This work has been supported by grants from NIH (R01 CA245977), VA (I01
BX005066), DOD (BC141898) and MCW Cancer Center (to GC).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest. GC is serving as one of the
Editorial Board members of this journal. We declare that GC had no involvement in
the peer review of this article and has no access to information regarding its
peer review. Full responsibility for the editorial process for this article was
delegated to GP.