Purpose: To evaluate pregnancy
outcome of selective second-trimester multifetal pregnancy reduction (MFPR)
compared with that of first-trimester MFPR, and control group which consists of
women with ongoing primary twin pregnancies. Materials and Methods: This
retrospective cohort study included all women with triplet pregnancies who
underwent fetal reductions to twin pregnancies from January 2010 to December 2019
in Shandong Provincial Hospital. 154 MFPR were performed by intracardially
injection of potassium chloride, 8 MFPR were performed by intracranially
injection of potassium chloride. Reductions to monochorionic twins and reductions
to one embryo were excluded. All procedures were performed at 12-24
Multiple births have steadily increased in recent years because of increased usage of assisted reproductive technologies in China and other countries [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. Compared with women with singleton and twin pregnancies, those with triplets have significantly increased risks of maternal morbidity [6], which includes gestational diabetes [7], hypertensive disorders [8], Cesarean delivery [9, 10], excessive hemorrhage [11], and non-spontaneous heterotopic triplets [12]. To decrease the risks associated with triplet pregnancies, multifetal pregnancy reduction (MFPR) has been proposed [13, 14]. The most frequently used method is ultrasound-guided transabdominal injection of potassium chloride into the fetal heart in the chest cavity [15]. Our objective in the present study was to evaluate pregnancy outcomes after selective MFPR in the second trimester and to compare it with the those after first-trimester MFPR. Ongoing twin pregnancies were used as a control group.
This retrospective study included all women with triplet pregnancies who
underwent fetal reductions to twin pregnancies from January 2010 to December 2019
in Shandong Provincial Hospital, which lies in Shandong provincial peninsula in
eastern China with a population of 98 million. 154 MFPR were performed
transabdominally after local anesthetics by using a 20G needle to intracardially
inject potassium chloride, 8 MFPR were performed to intracranially inject
potassium chloride. Reductions to monochorionic twins and reductions to one
embryo were excluded. All procedures were performed at 12-24
Data are expressed as means
We identified 162 women with triplet pregnancies who underwent fetal reductions
to twin pregnancies after excluding 23 women due to chorionic disease and
congenital anomaly. We classified the MFPR groups into MFPR group at gestation
12-13
Group | Cases | Abortion | |
Cases | Percentage (%) | ||
MFPR | 162 | 23 | 14.2 |
12–13 |
96 | 8 | 8.3 |
14–15 |
35 | 5 | 13.3 |
16–24 |
31 | 9 | 29.0 |
Control | 160 | 11 | 6.9 |
The average gestation time at delivery of the MFPR group (36.8
Groups | Delivery after 28 wk gestation | Average gestation time before delivery (mean |
Delivery at 28–34 wk | Birth weight (mean |
Asymmetric fetal growth | GDM | HDCP | ||||||
Cases | Percentage (%) | A | B | Cases | percentage (%) | Cases | Percentage (%) | Cases | Percentage (%) | ||||
MFPR | 139 | 36.8 |
9 | 6.5 | 2729.2 |
2411.5 |
17 | 12.2 | 4 | 2.9 | 16 | 11.5 | |
12–13 |
88 | 36.4 |
8 | 9.1 | 2692.9 |
2368.3 |
9 | 10.2 | 2 | 2.2 | 10 | 11.4 | |
14–15 |
30 | 37.7 |
0 | 0 | 2849.0 |
2534.1 |
5 | 16.7 | 1 | 3.3 | 3 | 10 | |
16–24 |
22 | 36.1 |
1 | 4.5 | 2731.5 |
2414.0 |
3 | 13.6 | 1 | 4.5 | 3 | 13.6 | |
Control | 149 | 36.9 |
11 | 7.4 | 2741.6 |
2420.5 |
16 | 10.7 | 3 | 2 | 12 | 8.1 | |
4.57 | -0.338 | 0.01 | -0.158 | -0.138 | 0.057 | 0.662 | 0.013 | ||||||
P value |
0.033 | 0.813 | 0.865 | 0.868 | 0.885 | 0.874 | 0.425 | 0.916 | |||||
8.653 | 1.281 | 2.693 | 1.31 | 1.396 | 1.652 | 0.418 | 0.298 | ||||||
P value |
0.011 | 0.294 | 0.281 | 0.288 | 0.276 | 0.447 | 0.832 | 0.883 |
The hospital was the first in China to perform MFPR during the second trimester [15]. Since the first MFPR in the second trimester was performed in January 2002 [16], we have performed hundreds of MFPR by injection of potassium chloride into the fetal heart by now; the success rate is 90.04%, the abortion rate is 9.06%. The reason of abortion includes bleeding and infection after MFPR as well as natural abortion led by abnormal embryos.
We have also tried other methods, such as intracranial injection of potassium chloride and radiofrequency ablation, when frequent fetal movements, the awkward position of fetuses, poor thoracic display, and extremely small thorax because of fetal thoracic abnormality happened. We postponed MFPR to the second trimester. By contrast, most MFPR in China were performed during the first trimester [3]. During the first trimester, it was often difficult to confirm suspected fetal defects, and there were a higher fetal damage rate and a higher infection rate associated with transvaginal procedures.
In Ata et al.’s study, it suggests that the obstetric outcomes of IVF triplets which spontaneously reduce to twins are similar to that of elective reduction to twins and pregnancies conceived as dichorionic twins. In our study, we try to find a better opportunity to reduce fetuses [17]. Our results suggest that MFPR in the early second trimester does not increase the risk of complications for pregnant women and newborn infants. The early second trimester MFPR is an effective way to reduce fetal defects associated with first trimester MFPR, as wells as to avoid the birth of abnormal fetuses, reduce complications of pregnant women, and improve neonatal quality. Of course, there are some limitations in our study, one of which is that we did not study the result of reducing the triplet pregnancies into singletons. In Haas et al.’s study, it suggests that triplet pregnancies reduced to singletons rather than twins, result in better obstetric outcomes [18]. We will study the early second-trimester multifetal pregnancy reduction to singleton in the coming stage.
ART, assisted reproductive technologies; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; HDCP, hypertensive disorder complicating pregnancy; MFPR, multifetal pregnancy reduction.
Yanhui Zhu designed the research study. Ting Han collected data. Jingjing Jiang performed statistics and wrote the method and results. Yanhui Zhu finished the left parts of writing and polished the whole paper. All authors contributed to editorial changes in the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
I would like to express my gratitude to all those who helped me during the writing of this manuscript.
The authors thank Dr. Yan Sheng (Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University) for the critical reading of this manuscript.
Thank numerous individuals participated in this study.
Thanks to all the peer reviewers and editors for their opinions and suggestions.
The authors declare no competing interests.