- Academic Editor
†These authors contributed equally.
§Both equally supervised the study.
Background: Although periconception vaccination is important for maternal and neonatal health, vaccine hesitancy could pose a challenge to achieving a healthy pregnancy in infertile women. We assessed the prevalence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) booster vaccination, associated factors, adverse event after vaccination, and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection among women seeking fertility treatment. Methods: We used the data from participants of the Pregnancy and Urban Environment study (PRUNE study), which is a prospective observational study designed to explore the association between pregnancy and the urban environment in infertile couples. From October 2019 to September 2021, a total of 534 patients provided informed consent and participated in the first and second rounds of a mobile survey conducted at six-month intervals. In the second and third rounds of the survey, we included questions about COVID-19 vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Adjusted risk ratios (aRR) were calculated for COVID-19 booster vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Results: All the women participating in the survey had completed the primary series of COVID-19 vaccination. The booster vaccination rate was 38.5%, and the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was 34.4%. The likelihood of receiving a booster vaccination was higher when women reported alcohol consumption (aRR = 1.90, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03–3.51, p = 0.041). SARS-CoV-2 infection was inversely associated with nulliparity (aRR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.17–1.09, p = 0.077). Among the women vaccinated against COVID-19, 44.3% of respondents reported at least one adverse reaction after receiving the vaccine. Conclusions: All the women participating in the survey had completed primary series of COVID-19 vaccination. The booster vaccination rate was 38.5%, and the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was 34.4%. Among the vaccinated women, 44.3% reported experiencing at least one adverse reaction after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. Fever/chilling was the most common (61.8%), followed by abnormal vaginal bleeding/menstrual irregularity (41.8%). A targeted education program by health professionals is needed to promote the benefits of periconception vaccination and reduce the resistance to the COVID-19 vaccine among infertile couples. Clinical Trial Registration: The study was registered at Clinical Research Information Service (https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/info/dataset.do), registration number: KCT0003560.
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a profound impact on the entire world, causing significant health and economic consequences. The development of effective vaccines against the virus has been a major milestone in the fight against the disease. The first COVID-19 vaccine to receive Emergency Use Authorization from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in December 2020 was developed by Pfizer-BioNTech, followed subsequently by others such as Moderna, AstraZeneca, and Johnson & Johnson/Janssen. These COVID-19 vaccines have demonstrated high efficacy in reducing the risk of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and COVID-19-related morbidity [1, 2]. Globally, as of Oct 3, 2022, 69.7% of the world’s population has received their initial doses of COVID-19 vaccine [3]. Despite the ongoing emergence of omicron variants, the worldwide coverage of booster doses stands at 31.9%.
Safety concerns regarding possible side effects are the primary reasons reported for skipping booster vaccinations [4]. There is particular concern about the potential impact of vaccination on fertility [5]. Given the effective protection offered by booster doses and the potential risks associated with antenatal SARS-CoV-2 infection, vaccine hesitancy regarding booster shots presents a challenge in achieving healthy pregnancies for infertile couples. Misinformation and conspiracy claims linking COVID-19 vaccines to infertility or adverse reproductive outcomes are widespread on social media, leading to vaccine hesitancy among couples of reproductive age, especially those facing infertility [6].
This study aimed to assess the prevalence of COVID-19 booster vaccination, associated factors, adverse events after vaccination, and SARS-CoV-2 infection among women seeking fertility treatment. This information will be valuable for healthcare providers, policymakers, and women facing infertility.
We utilized data from participants in the Pregnancy and Urban Environment study (PRUNE study), a prospective observational study designed to investigate the association between pregnancy and the urban environment in infertile couples (Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS) registration No.: KCT0003560). The inclusion criteria included individuals aged 20 and above who were part of heterosexual couples cohabiting and willing to provide informed consent for both baseline and follow-up surveys. Exclusion criteria applied to individuals with known genetic disorders or severe chronic conditions that could impact reproductive function, as well as those involved in gamete donation cycles, surrogacy, or in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures utilizing frozen oocytes or sperm. From October 2019 to September 2021, a total of 534 patients provided informed consents and participated in the first and second rounds of a mobile survey, conducted at six-month intervals. In the second-round survey, we included questions about COVID-19 vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 Infection.
The questions regarding COVID-19 vaccination included: ‘Have you received the COVID-19 vaccine?’, ‘How many times have you received the COVID-19 vaccine?’, and ‘Did you experience any adverse events after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine?’. Out of the 183 female participants who agreed to participate in the COVID-19 vaccination survey, we received 166 responses and utilized data from 161 patients, excluding those with missing information.
Descriptive statistics were calculated for COVID-19 booster vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Age, body mass index (BMI), alcohol consumption, occupation, household income, parity, duration of infertility and self-rated health since first survey were used as covariates. Adjusted risk ratios (aRR) were calculated for booster vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection. The risk estimates were analyzed using log-binomial regression. All analyses were performed using R version 4.0.5 (The R Foundation, Vienna, Austria).
Among the women participating in the survey, all the then completed the primary series of COVID-19 vaccination. The coverage for booster doses was 38.5%, and the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was 34.4%. The booster vaccination rate was higher among women aged 35 years or older, those who were overweight, currently consuming alcohol, had a low average monthly household income, had never been pregnant, and reported good subjective health. COVID-19 infection was more common in people over the age of 35, those who were overweight, currently consuming alcohol, and those who had been pregnant (Table 1).
Characteristic | Third dose of COVID-19 vaccination (column %) | SARS-CoV-2 infection (column %) | |||
Yes (n = 62) | No (n = 99) | Yes (n = 55) | No (n = 105) | ||
Age (years) | |||||
72.58 | 66.32 | 72.2 | 65.7 | ||
Body mass index (kg/m |
|||||
4.92 | 6.25 | 5.6 | 5.9 | ||
18.5–25 | 60.66 | 71.88 | 64.8 | 69.6 | |
34.43 | 21.88 | 29.6 | 24.5 | ||
Alcohol drinking | 64.52 | 42.71 | 60 | 46.08 | |
Occupation | |||||
Not employed, student | 24.59 | 27.08 | 22.22 | 26.47 | |
Manager, business owners and professionals | 21.31 | 26.04 | 22.22 | 26.47 | |
Clerical, service and sales | 45.9 | 43.75 | 53.7 | 40.2 | |
Industrial, manual, elementary, others | 8.2 | 3.13 | 1.85 | 6.86 | |
Monthly household income (KRW) | |||||
Less than 4 million | 64.71 | 54.29 | 58.7 | 59.2 | |
Nulliparity | 91.94 | 89.58 | 85.5 | 94.1 | |
Self-rated poor health | 16.13 | 19.39 | 18.2 | 18.3 |
1 USD = 1351 KRW. COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.
In a multivariate-adjusted model, the risk of receiving a COVID-19 booster vaccination was higher among women who currently drink compared to women who do not drink (relative risk (RR) = 1.90, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03–3.51, p = 0.041, Table 2, Fig. 1). The risk of COVID-19 infection was lower in women who have never given birth compared to women who have had children (0.44, 95% CI: 0.17–1.09, p = 0.077; Table 2, Fig. 2).
Log-transformed adjusted RR 95% confidence interval of female baseline characteristics by third doses of COVID-19 vaccination. BMI, body mass index; RR, risk ratios.
Log-transformed adjusted RR 95% confidence interval of female baseline characteristics by SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Characteristic | Third doses of COVID-19 vaccination | SARS-CoV-2 infection | |||
RR (95% CI) | p-value | RR (95% CI) | p-value | ||
Age | |||||
20–34 | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | |||
1.22 (0.68–2.18) | 0.503 | 1.32 (0.74–2.32) | 0.345 | ||
Body mass index | |||||
18.5–25 | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | |||
1.07 (0.42–2.69) | 0.887 | 0.77 (0.21–2.84) | 0.698 | ||
1.28 (0.78–2.09) | 0.325 | 1.12 (0.62–2.04) | 0.698 | ||
Alcohol drinking | |||||
No | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | |||
Yes | 1.90 (1.03–3.51) | 0.041 | 1.56 (0.88–2.75) | 0.128 | |
Employment | |||||
Non employed | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | |||
Employed | 0.97 (0.50–1.87) | 0.926 | 1.10 (0.44–2.76) | 0.837 | |
Annual household income (KRW) | |||||
More than 40 million | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | |||
Less than 40 million | 1.06 (0.62–1.82) | 0.833 | 0.72 (0.42–1.25) | 0.242 | |
Parity | |||||
Primi- or multiparity | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | |||
Nulliparity | 0.97 (0.25–3.77) | 0.966 | 0.44 (0.17–1.09) | 0.077 | |
Duration of infertility | |||||
Less than 2 years | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | |||
2 years or longer | 0.71 (0.33–1.52) | 0.380 | 0.92 (0.49–1.74) | 0.807 | |
Self rated health | |||||
Good/very good/excellent | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | |||
Fair/Poor | 1.13 (0.62–2.08) | 0.685 | 0.92 (0.47–1.81) | 0.805 |
1 USD = 1351 KRW. RR, relative risk; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.
Among the women who were vaccinated against COVID-19, 8.1% was pregnant at the time of vaccination. Fifty-five women (44.3% of respondents) reported experiencing at least one adverse reaction after receiving the any dose of COVID-19 vaccine (Table 3). Fever/chilling were the most common (61.8%), followed by abnormal vaginal bleeding/menstrual irregularity (41.8%).
Symptom | Frequency | Percentage |
Fever/chilling | 34 (55*) | 61.8% |
Gastrointestinal symptoms (Nausea, Vomiting, Diarrhea) | 20 (55*) | 36.4% |
Local/general allergic reaction | 11 (55*) | 20.0% |
Dyspnea or chest pain | 13 (55*) | 23.6% |
Abnormal vaginal bleeding/menstrual irregularity | 23 (55*) | 41.8% |
Spontaneous abortion or stillbirth | 2 (7*) | 28.6% |
Preterm birth | 1 (7*) | 14.3% |
Others | 18 (54*) | 33.3% |
*number of respondents who reported vaccine adverse effects.
According to the World Health Organization (WHO) dashboard’s vaccination data, as of May 25, 2023, South Korea had a cumulative vaccination rate of 83.81% for the primary dose and 65.62% for the booster shot. As expected, the booster vaccination rate was lower, 38.5% among women seeking infertility treatment compared to the general population. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was reported among women seeking fertility treatment in China, where the overall coverage rate for the primary COVID-19 vaccine was 67.68%, and none of the participants received booster vaccinations [7]. On social media, misinformation and unfounded claims linking COVID-19 vaccines to infertility were widespread, leading to vaccine skepticism [8]. Research has shown that there is no scientific evidence of any association between COVID-19 vaccines and fertility impairment in men or women [9]. However, fear of fertility-related side effects was a major reason for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among infertile women [10]. Therefore, it is essential to disseminate guidelines and implement targeted education programs led by health professionals to promote the benefits of periconception vaccination, and reduce resistance to COVID-19 vaccines among infertile couples.
Booster vaccination was found to be associated with alcohol consumption in this study. During the SARS-Cov-2 pandemic, the consumption of alcoholic beverages increased [11]. Lockdowns have had an impact on mental health and have contributed to a rise in global alcohol consumption. We can cautiously speculate that women experiencing the effects of lockdowns and consuming alcohol at home might be more inclined to get fully vaccinated in the hope of regaining a sense of freedom.
SARS-CoV-2 infection was inversely associated with nulliparity. The lower infection rate in nulliparous women is presumed to be due to a reduced likelihood of household transmission. Household transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is well-documented [12], and secondary transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from pediatric index cases within households has been reported to range from 0% to 75% [13].
COVID-19 vaccine can lead to various local and systemic side effects [14], including menstrual irregularities in women [15, 16]. In this study, 41.8% of those who reported adverse events after vaccination (equivalent to 18.5% of the vaccinated women) experienced an abnormal uterine bleeding/menstrual irregularities. The prevalence aligns with a recent meta-analysis which reported pooled prevalence rates of menorrhagia, polymenorrhea, and oligomenorrhea at 24.2%, 16.2% and 22.7%, respectively [17]. The endocrine and immune changes following COVID-19 vaccination could potentially contribute to menstrual disturbances [18]. These vaccine-induced menstrual disturbances might raise concerns and hesitations among some women regarding receiving vaccination and booster shots. It’s worth noting that menstrual irregularities after the vaccine tend to self-resolve in approximately half of the cases within two months [15]. Therefore, healthcare providers should consider informing reproductive-aged women that temporary and self-limiting menstrual cycle irregularities in the subsequent month can occur during counseling about the COVID-19 vaccine.
The strength of the study lies in its exclusive focus on infertile women seeking treatment. These women have heightened concerns about the impact of vaccines on fertility, and given their potential role as future mothers, the necessity of vaccination becomes even more significant. However, a limitation of the study is the relatively small size of the study population, which may introduce selection bias. This study was based on an analysis of an existing database, which had some missing data. To maximize external validity, we did not include participants with missing data. Consequently, our findings rely on data collected from a restricted subset of the study population, potentially introducing selection bias.
In summary, all the women participating in the survey had completed the primary series of COVID-19 vaccination. The booster vaccination rate was 38.5%, which is lower compared to general population. The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was 34.4%. Among the vaccinated women, 44.3% reported experiencing at least one adverse reaction after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine, with fever/chilling being the most common (61.8%), followed by abnormal vaginal bleeding/menstrual irregularity (41.8%). Targeted education program led by health professionals is needed to promote the benefits of periconception vaccination and reduce resistance to the COVID-19 vaccine among infertile couples.
The anonymous data used in this study are available from the corresponding author on a reasonable request.
SAC and JHK designed and performed the research. EK analyzed the data. SGP and JHK drafted the manuscript. SGP, TK and YJC contributed to the interpretation of the results and critically checked the manuscript. All authors contributed to editorial changes in the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. All authors have participated sufficiently in the work and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
All subjects gave their informed consent for inclusion before they participated in the study. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine (approval number: 2021-03-026).
We thank all the participants and staff who supported the conduction of the survey.
This research was supported by grants from the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety from 2022–2025 (22183MFDS433) and SK Bioscience Co., Ltd (Q2208741).
The authors declare no conflict of interest. SK Bioscience Co., Ltd provided funding, but there was no potential conflict of interest in the preparation and publication of the manuscript.
Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.