- Academic Editor
Background: Awareness and knowledge of cervical cancer and human
papillomavirus (HPV) are consistently poor in low-resource settings. In addition,
there is insufficient evidence about young people’s knowledge and understanding
of cervical cancer, risk factors, screening and HPV vaccination in these
countries. This study was conducted to determine the knowledge, attitudes and
behaviors of students studying at a university in Somalia regarding cervical
cancer and how to prevent it. Methods: This cross-sectional study was
conducted among students of the Faculty of Health Sciences at a private
university in Mogadishu, Somalia, between January and March 2021. The sample of
study consisted of a total of 220 female students. The data of the study were
collected using a questionnaire consisting of 32 questions evaluating the
knowledge and attitudes of the students regarding cervical cancer, HPV and the
HPV vaccine. Results: In the study, 59.1% of the participants stated
that they had previously heard of cervical cancer, 69.1% did not know that it
was fatal, 49.1% stated that it was preventable, 48.2% did not know the causes
of cervical cancer, and 2.7% had a family history of cervical cancer. In
addition, it was determined that 75.9% of the participants did not know that HPV
caused cervical cancer. When the knowledge of the participants about HPV and the
HPV vaccine was examined, it was determined that 55% of them had not previously
heard of HPV. When asked about how HPV is transmitted they stated that this
occurred through kissing (73.2%), sexual intercourse (58.2%) and using items
owned by individuals infected with HPV (41.8%). None of the participants had
received the HPV vaccine. Of these, 72.3% stated that they had not been
vaccinated because they did not know about the vaccine. According to 40.9% of
the participants, both boys and girls should be vaccinated; however, 63.6%
stated that they did not know at what age individuals should receive a vaccine.
In addition, 71.4% of participants said they did not know that the HPV vaccine
protects against HPV-related sexually transmitted diseases. There was a
statistically significant relationship only between the participants’ financial
status and the awareness variable (p
The fourth most frequent form of cancer in women globally is cervical cancer [1]. The great majority of the most prevalent sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the world are caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Approximately 70% of instances of cervical cancer are caused by HPV strains 16 and 18 [2, 3]. The most common cancer associated with HPV is cervical cancer [2]. In 2018, 311,000 women died from cervical cancer and 570,000 women received a diagnosis of the diseased [4]. Most fatalities take place in low-resource settings [5]. The incidences are also higher in low-resource settings, which account for 85% of all cases reported annually [6]. Cervical cancer affects more women in Sub-Saharan Africa than in any other region, but it is also the most prevalent form of cancer, accounting for 13% of all female cancers [7]. In Somalia, cervical cancer is the second most prevalent female cancer after breast cancer [8]. There are 10.2 cervical cancer deaths per 100,000 females and 13.2 new instances of the disease in Somalia every year [9].
The early stages of cervical cancer are symptomless [10]. Late-stage malignancies and metastasis of the disease are caused by a lack of knowledge about the signs and symptoms of cervical cancer, such as irregular bleeding and low back pain [11, 12]. Women have a better chance of surviving cervical cancer if it is discovered early [13]. Pap smear, along with the use of vaccines, is a dual strategy in the prevention of intraepithelial neoplasia and the early diagnosis of cervical cancer, and has the greatest effect on the incidence, outcome and mortality associated with cervical cancer [14, 15]. Numerous clinical studies and systematic reviews worldwide have demonstrated the efficacy of the HPV vaccine in preventing up to 90–99% of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) [16].
In Sub-Saharan Africa, only 10% of women had been screened for cervical cancer, according to data from the 2017 World Health Survey. Moreover, in four West African nations, less than 1% of women had had a cervical cancer screening [17]. Cervical cancer is the second most frequent cancer in women in Somalia, and at the same time there is no early detection, screening, or immunization program [18]. These findings demonstrate that promoting and putting into practice cervical cancer screening services is difficult in many countries [19, 20]. Many studies have identified the reasons why these services are not accepted and the difficulties encountered. One of the main reasons is thought to be a lack of comprehensive and appropriate information about cervical cancer, as well as negative attitudes towards the HPV vaccination and screening [21, 22, 23]. One out of every 20 young individuals are at danger of developing a sexually transmitted disease, according to studies, and this risk increases every year [24]. Even among young adults, awareness of HPV is typically poor in most nations, despite its high incidence [25]. In one prior study, female college students between the ages of 18 and 24 in Washington State were found to be at risk of HPV infection [26]. According to a study conducted in Nigeria, only a small percentage of university students were aware of HPV infection (17.7%) and HPV vaccination (14.4%) [27]. In a survey with Turkish female nursing students, it was discovered that more than half of them had no awareness of HPV and the majority of them had never heard of it [28]. According to a study conducted in India, just 6.8% of medical and paramedical students had received the HPV vaccine, whereas 44.9% had good knowledge of it [29].
Low-resource settings continually have low rates of cervical cancer and HPV vaccine awareness and education. However, detailed evidence about young people’s awareness and comprehension of cervical cancer, risk factors, screening, and HPV vaccination in these nations is also lacking [30]. The sources of information from which people in less developed nations can learn about cervical cancer are still scarce [30]. It is critical for students to be informed about, and aware of, cervical cancer so they are motivated to attend premalignant cervical lesion screening and take other preventative measures [31]. Therefore, educating adolescents about cervical cancer is a crucial strategy for care and prevention of the disease [17]. No study could be found in the literature that examined Somali university students’ knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding cervical cancer and preventative strategies. On the basis of the information given above, this study was designed with the objective of assessing the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of students enrolled at a university in Somalia regarding cervical cancer and its prevention.
This descriptive study was conducted among students of the Faculty of Health Sciences at a private university in Mogadishu, Somalia, between 1 January and 30 March 2021.
The study population consisted of students attending the Faculty of Health Sciences of a Turkish university in Mogadishu, Somalia. Due to the security problem in Mogadishu, the researchers were not allowed to go outside the campus, so they could only reach the students in this faculty. The sample was selected from among the students who agreed to participate in the study.
Volunteering to participate in the study.
Being 18 years of age or older.
Not volunteering to participate in the research.
Not completing the data collection tools.
The population of the study consisted of 400 students enrolled in the Faculty of
Health Sciences and the preparatory class. The required sample size was
calculated as 197 students (calculated at
http://www.raosoft.com/samplesize.html). The student who answered the
questionnaire allowed the level of knowledge to be estimated with a margin of
error of 95% and
The data collection tool, which had 32 questions, was created by the researchers as a result of a literature review [1, 17, 32, 33, 34, 35]. Sociodemographic information was obtained about the participant, including their age, class, and family history of cervical cancer. In addition, questions were included about the knowledge, attitudes and behavior of the participants regarding cervical cancer, HPV and the HPV vaccine. The information was interpreted in terms of the participants’ awareness of HPV infection, its association with cervical cancer, its asymptomatic nature, its mode of transmission, its prevention, vaccine availability and accessibility, and Pap testing. The survey questions prepared were tested on 10 participants in a pilot application after the opinions of five specialist health personnel had been taken into account. The results obtained from this were not included in the final study. It took each participant approximately 15–20 minutes to fill out the questionnaire. Participants who answered the questions in the information section of the questionnaire correctly were considered to be knowledgeable. Attitude was interpreted in terms of the participants’ perception of the disease (positive or negative), and their willingness to have a Pap test and get the HPV vaccine.
Data were collected by the designated researchers and the participants were selected using a systematic random sampling technique. The questionnaires were administered using the students’ timetable during appropriate class hours. After 15 participants were fully informed about the study and had signed the informed consent form, the pilot application was conducted; these participants were then excluded from the study. The questionnaires were prepared in such a way that the participants could easily fill in by themselves. The questionnaire ensured the anonymity of the participants, the authenticity of the information and the protection of confidentiality at all times. Data were collected until the desired sample size was reached. Analysis was then carried out. All students were given the opportunity to participate or to decline to participate, and volunteerism was accepted as the basis for the study. No identifying information was requested or recorded. Informed consent was included on the first page of the questionnaire and it was ensured that the students had given their consent to participate in the study.
In evaluating the data the SPSS 22.0 package program by IBM Corp was used (Released 2013. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Sociodemographic characteristics were defined using descriptive statistics (frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviation). In order to determine the distribution of the data, skewness and kurtosis coefficients, coefficient of variation, histogram, normal and detrend plots, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was applied. In the evaluation, it was observed that the data were not normally distributed. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare independent paired groups, and Kruskal-Wallis analysis was used for comparison of more than two groups. The statistical significance limit was accepted as 0.05. Answering “Yes” to questions 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14, 20, 23, 24 and 28 in the questionnaire indicated that the person had awareness about cervical cancer and HPV. With the help of these questions, the rate of answering “Yes” to these questions was calculated as a variable for the awareness of the participants. The variable calculated was “Awareness” and it had continuous values between 0 and 1. The Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests, which are among the non-parametric tests, were used to investigate whether there was a statistically significant difference between this variable and the sub-categories of the variables (age, class, marital status and financial status of their families) showing the sociodemographic status of the participants.
Of the participants, 64.5% were in the 18–20 age range, 54.5% had a medium economic status, 88.2% were single and 43.6% were studying in the preparatory class (Table 1).
Characteristics | n | % | |
Age (years) | |||
18–20 | 142 | 64.5 | |
21–25 | 78 | 35.5 | |
Parents’ income | |||
70 | 31.8 | ||
=$100 | 120 | 54.5 | |
30 | 13.7 | ||
Marital status | |||
Married | 26 | 11.8 | |
Never married | 194 | 88.2 | |
Class | |||
Preparatory Grade | 96 | 43.6 | |
1. Grade | 75 | 34.1 | |
2. Grade | 49 | 22.3 |
The status of the participants’ knowledge about cervical cancer is given in Table 2. Of the participants, 59.1% stated that they had previously heard of cervical cancer, 69.1% did not know that it could cause death, 49.1% stated that it was preventable, 48.2% did not know the causes of cervical cancer, and 2.7% had a family history of cervical cancer. In addition, 75.9% of the participants did not know that HPV causes cervical cancer, and 89.1% stated that mothers should be informed about cervical cancer. 77.3% of the participants stated that education about cervical cancer should be given in schools, and this education should cover how to prevent cervical cancer (48.6%), treatment (46.8%), transmission routes (40%), symptoms (39.5%) and nutrition (31.4%). Of the participants, 86.8% stated that they had not heard of the Pap smear, while only 1.4% stated that they had previously had this test (Table 2).
Questions | n | % | |
Have you heard of cervical cancer? | |||
Yes | 130 | 59.1 | |
No | 90 | 40.9 | |
Does cervical cancer cause death? | |||
Yes | 54 | 24.5 | |
No | 14 | 6.4 | |
I don’t know | 152 | 69.1 | |
Is cervical cancer preventable? | |||
Yes | 108 | 49.1 | |
No | 13 | 5.9 | |
I don’t know | 99 | 45.0 | |
Do you know the causes of cervical cancer? | |||
Yes | 41 | 18.6 | |
No | 73 | 33.2 | |
I don’t know | 106 | 48.2 | |
Do you have a family history of cervical cancer? | |||
Yes | 6 | 2.7 | |
No | 214 | 97.3 | |
Does human papillomavirus (HPV) cause cervical cancer? | |||
Yes | 30 | 13.6 | |
No | 23 | 10.5 | |
I don’t know | 167 | 75.9 | |
Should mothers be given information about cervical cancer? | |||
Yes | 196 | 89.1 | |
No | 24 | 10.9 | |
Should education about cervical cancer be given at school? | |||
Yes | 170 | 77.3 | |
No | 50 | 22.7 | |
What topics should education about cervical cancer include? | |||
Ways it is transmitted | |||
Yes | 88 | 40 | |
No | 132 | 60 | |
Ways to prevent it | |||
Yes | 107 | 48.6 | |
No | 113 | 51.4 | |
Symptoms of cervical cancer | |||
Yes | 87 | 39.5 | |
No | 133 | 60.5 | |
Treatment | |||
Yes | 103 | 46.8 | |
No | 117 | 53.2 | |
Nutrition | |||
Yes | 69 | 31.4 | |
No | 151 | 68.6 | |
Have you heard about the Pap smear? | |||
Yes | 29 | 13.2 | |
No | 191 | 86.8 | |
Have you had a Pap smear? | |||
Yes | 3 | 1.4 | |
No | 217 | 98.6 |
The status of the participants’ knowledge regarding HPV and the HPV vaccine is given in Table 3. It was determined that 55% of the participants had not previously heard of HPV. When asked about how HPV is transmitted, they reported that it could be transmitted by kissing (73.2%), sexual intercourse (58.2%), and using items owned by individuals infected with HPV (41.8%). None of the participants had received the HPV vaccine, and 72.3% of them stated that not knowing about it was the reason they had not been vaccinated. 40.9% stated that both boys and girls should be vaccinated, and 63.6% stated that they did not know at what age they should be vaccinated. In addition, 71.4% stated that they did not know that the HPV vaccine protects against sexually transmitted diseases. 65.5% of the participants stated that the programs to prevent cervical cancer would be effective, 86.3% of them wanted to received information about HPV vaccine, and 57.3% of them stated that they wanted to get this information from the nurse. Finally, it was determined that they wanted to get information about the effectiveness (47.7%), side effects (47.7%) and protection (43.6%) of the HPV vaccine (Table 3).
Questions | n | % | ||
Have you heard of HPV? | ||||
Yes | 99 | 45.0 | ||
No | 121 | 55.0 | ||
What do you think are the transmission routes of HPV? | ||||
Sexual intercourse | ||||
Yes | 128 | 58.2 | ||
No | 92 | 41.8 | ||
Using the infected person’s belongings | ||||
Yes | 92 | 41.8 | ||
No | 128 | 58.2 | ||
Kissing | ||||
Yes | 161 | 73.2 | ||
No | 59 | 26.8 | ||
Have you heard of the HPV vaccine? | ||||
Yes | 61 | 27.7 | ||
No | 159 | 72.3 | ||
Have you had the HPV vaccine? | ||||
Yes | 0 | 0 | ||
No | 220 | 100 | ||
Why have you not had the HPV vaccine? | ||||
I don’t know anything about it | 159 | 72.3 | ||
I don’t have the financial means | 20 | 9.1 | ||
I don’t think it is necessary | 25 | 11.4 | ||
Other | 16 | 7.3 | ||
Who should get the HPV vaccine? | ||||
Boys | 12 | 5.5 | ||
Girls | 77 | 35.0 | ||
Both boys and girls | 90 | 40.9 | ||
Neither boys nor girls | 23 | 10.5 | ||
Other | 18 | 8.2 | ||
At what age should the HPV vaccine be given? | ||||
2 years or less | 5 | 2.3 | ||
12–26 years | 24 | 10.9 | ||
27–50 years | 31 | 14.1 | ||
51 years or more | 4 | 1.8 | ||
All ages | 16 | 7.3 | ||
I don’t know | 140 | 63.6 | ||
Does the HPV vaccine protect against sexually transmitted diseases? | ||||
Yes | 47 | 21.4 | ||
No | 16 | 7.3 | ||
I don’t know | 157 | 71.4 | ||
Can cervical cancer screening programs and education be effective in preventing cervical cancer? | ||||
Yes, they can be very effective | 144 | 65.5 | ||
They might be a little effective | 51 | 23.2 | ||
No, they won’t have any effect | 25 | 11.4 | ||
Would you like to receive information about the HPV vaccine? | ||||
Yes | 190 | 86.3 | ||
No | 30 | 13.7 | ||
Who would you like to speak to about the HPV vaccine? | ||||
Nurse | ||||
Yes | 126 | 57.3 | ||
No | 94 | 42.7 | ||
Doctor | ||||
Yes | 84 | 38.2 | ||
No | 136 | 61.8 | ||
Teacher | ||||
Yes | 106 | 48.2 | ||
No | 114 | 51.8 | ||
What would you like to learn about the HPV vaccine? | ||||
What does the HPV vaccine prevent | ||||
Yes | 96 | 43.6 | ||
No | 124 | 56.4 | ||
Efficacy of the HPV vaccine | ||||
Yes | 105 | 47.7 | ||
No | 115 | 52.3 | ||
Side effects of the HPV vaccine | ||||
Yes | 105 | 47.7 | ||
No | 115 | 52.3 | ||
Level of protection of the HPV vaccine | ||||
Yes | 64 | 29.1 | ||
No | 156 | 70.9 |
The results show that there was a statistically significant relationship only
between the economic situation and the awareness variable (p
Characteristics | Awareness | ||
Mean | Statistics; p-value | ||
Age (years) | |||
17–20 | 105.6 | Z = –1.729; 0.084 | |
21–25 | 120.40 | ||
Parents’ income | |||
130.36 | |||
=$100 | 101.40 | ||
100.57 | |||
Marital status | |||
Married | 126.40 | Z = –1.422; 0.155 | |
Never married | 107.79 | ||
Class | |||
Preparatory Grade | 107.93 | ||
1. Grade | 105.15 | ||
2. Grade | 123.73 |
Z = Mann-Whitney U test,
This study is the first to examine the knowledge, awareness and behavior of Somali female university students regarding cervical cancer, HPV and the HPV vaccine. The study revealed that the majority of participants were unaware of cervical cancer, HPV and the HPV vaccine. More than half the participants in our study had heard of cervical cancer, but only a quarter were aware that it could be fatal. More than 90% of new cervical cancer cases and related deaths worldwide occur in low- and middle-income countries. Poor knowledge and awareness of cervical cancer screening and vaccination are significant barriers to effective cervical cancer prevention in these nations. This was revealed when the knowledge levels of the students on cervical cancer were investigated. Once more, approximately half of the participants claimed to be unaware of the causes of cervical cancer and the fact that it is preventable. Only a quarter of the participants in our study were aware that the HPV virus caused cervical cancer. The most significant gynecological cancer that can be prevented through early detection using screening tests is cervical cancer. It is thus crucial to be aware of the causes of cancer. When we look at the literature, the results obtained from many Muslim countries show that the knowledge and awareness levels of university students regarding cervical cancer are low [36, 37, 38]. This situation was also revealed in this study that the knowledge level of the participating students was insufficient. Numerous factors are known to contribute to the low level of knowledge and awareness concerning cervical cancer. The main causes include the absence of a national cancer screening program, the difficulty women have accessing health services, an underdeveloped economy, inadequacies in the management of screening programs and other health services, and inadequate educational and follow-up programs.
According to our research, only a very small proportion of the participants had a family history of cervical cancer. Recent research has shown that those with a family history of cancer are more likely to develop cervical cancer, particularly women whose mother and sister have the disease [39]. The majority of participants stated that mothers should be made aware of cervical cancer. It is difficult to fully explain the situation in this specific sample due to the lack of epidemiological data [40]. In our study, more than three-quarters of the participants stated that education about cervical cancer should be given at school, and that this should include how to prevent cervical cancer, as well as its treatment, transmission and symptoms. The early acquisition of this knowledge, especially by students majoring in the health sciences, will enable them to better protect themselves and their future patients. In terms of preventing cervical cancer, it is crucial for women to avoid the risk factors before the disease manifests itself. Monogamous sexual behavior, using condoms to prevent infections, planning fertility, avoiding early sexual activity and pregnancy, and being aware of early warning signs and prevention are all vital. For instance, abnormal out-of-cycle bleeding and discharge, particularly spotting blood after coitus, should be watched closely, as these could be early signs of cancer. Women should be knowledgeable about personal cleanliness, particularly vulvar hygiene, and should abstain from using alcohol and tobacco. Protecting against risk factors, including carcinogens, and engaging in vaccination strategies and health education all contribute to primary prevention. Primary prevention also places importance on health education. As a result, it is imperative that the general public is well informed at all times. People should be educated about good health practices by offering health counseling and gathering relevant data. It is crucial to educate those who are at risk about how to prevent cancer and how to detect symptoms at an early stage. Secondary prevention should emphasize the value of routine health checks and early diagnosis [4, 10].
In the study, more than half of the participants had never heard of HPV. The majority of the participants also stated that they had never heard of the Pap smear. Other research on the subject conducted in African nations produced similar findings [2, 5]. Research involving Turkish university students has also revealed a low prevalence of HPV awareness [38]. According to studies conducted in European nations, there is a high rate of awareness of HPV. It was also found that the rates of hearing and knowing about HPV increased noticeably as a result of the “National HPV Immunization Program” put in place in the United States [41].
Sexual contact is the most frequent way that HPV, the most common cause of cervical cancer, is spread. Additionally, contaminated surfaces, skin sores, and the birth canal can all cause direct or indirect transfer. The number of sexual partners and age at which the illness was contracted are the most crucial determinants in sexual transmission. According to the participants in the present study, kissing, sexual contact, and using items owned by HPV-positive people are the three main ways that HPV is transmitted. The participants thus misunderstood HPV transmission to a certain extent. In studies conducted with students in developed nations, the rates of recognition of HPV risk factors and transmission channels were a high level, while the rates in underdeveloped countries were not at the desired level [36, 37, 38, 39]. We believe that measures should be taken to ascertain the degree of students’ knowledge of HPV and to raise awareness, particularly in low-resource settings.
Three-quarters of the participants in the present study had never heard of the
HPV vaccine and none of the participants had received the HPV vaccine. The
absence of a widespread HPV vaccination program in Somalia is one of the main
causes of this [40]. Approximately three-quarters of the participants stated that
their lack of vaccination was due to their lack of knowledge about it. Nearly
half of the participants stated that both girls and boys should be vaccinated,
while more than half of them stated that they were not sure about the appropriate
age for vaccination. Due to the fact that vaccination is the least expensive and
most effective public health measure against cervical cancer, the World Health
Organization (WHO) advises immunizing primarily girls between the ages of 9 and
13 [42]. The majority of the participants stated that they wanted more
information about the HPV vaccine, and more than half of those who wanted
information stated that the information requested should be given by nurses. The
participants stated that they would like to learn more about the effectiveness of
the HPV vaccine, its side effects and the level of protection it provides. Only
three-fifths of the participants stated that cervical cancer screening programs
and education could be very effective in preventing cervical cancer. This may be
due to the lack of health education programs regarding cervical cancer, HPV and
HPV vaccine, which is considered to be a problem in most developing countries.
The WHO has recommended comprehensive prevention and control strategies for
cervical cancer [4]. These include primary, secondary and tertiary prevention
strategies, such as community education, social mobilization, vaccination,
screening, treatment and palliative care [4]. In the present study, no
statistically significant difference was found among the participants in terms of
cancer awareness according to age, class and marital status (p
There are some limitations to the study. First, being single-centered and using a questionnaire format may have led to issues with the reliability of the answers given. On the other hand, the strength of the study is that, as far as we know, it is the first to measure the knowledge, attitudes and behaviors of female students studying in the field of health sciences in Somalia regarding cervical cancer, HPV and HPV vaccine.
In this study, female university students studying health sciences were found to have low levels of knowledge about cervical cancer, its prevention and the HPV vaccine. There is a need for primary and secondary prevention to reduce cervical cancer morbidity and mortality in Somalia. While secondary prevention through national screening programs has contributed significantly to reducing cervical cancer incidence and mortality in high-income countries, constraints in implementing and sustaining similar programs in Somalia have limited the effectiveness of screening. Primary prevention of cervical cancer through HPV vaccination is a cost-effective preventive measure that is currently being implemented in many countries around the world. In our study, none of the students had received the HPV vaccine and did not have sufficient information about the vaccine. Many factors, such as the country’s low level of economic development, lack of health education programs, and lack of a HPV vaccination and cervical cancer screening program, contribute to low cancer awareness and knowledge. Establishing national cervical cancer screening and prevention strategies and planning health education programs on HPV and the HPV vaccine will help increase awareness and reduce the incidence of cervical cancer.
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
ŞZA supervised the research and helped in writing the protocol and the first draft of this manuscript. ŞZA, ŞHM analyzed data. ŞZA and ŞHM completed data collection and data entry. ŞZA, ŞHM reviewed the final draft of this manuscript. Finally, both authors read and approved the manuscript.
The research was approved by the Ethics Committees of Somalia Mogadishu Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Training and Research Hospital (Decision No: MSTH/5359/2021/309). It was performed in collaboration with the Mogadishu Recep Tayyıp Erdoğan Faculty of Health Sciences. Written information was provided to the participants with information on the research objectives, methodological procedures adopted, possible risks and the contact they would have with the researcher. Their anonymity and the confidentiality of the study were guaranteed. Additionally, participants attended a face-to-face meeting with the research team before the questionnaires were applied, when this information was repeated, and doubts were clarified. Students were informed that participation was voluntary, and they could express their refusal to participate through direct contact with the research team at the face-to-face meeting. Informed written consent was obtained from all participants. All methods were carried out in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations (the Helsinki Declaration).
We thank all the participants.
This research received no external funding.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.