IMR Press / FBL / Volume 29 / Issue 3 / DOI: 10.31083/j.fbl2903116
Open Access Short Communication
Host Cell-dependent Modulatory Role of Ras Homolog Enriched in Brain-Like-1 (RhebL1) Protein in Influenza A/NWS/33 Virus-infected Mammalian Cells
Show Less
1 Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
*Correspondence: flora.deconto@unipr.it (Flora De Conto)
Front. Biosci. (Landmark Ed) 2024, 29(3), 116; https://doi.org/10.31083/j.fbl2903116
Submitted: 24 October 2023 | Revised: 23 February 2024 | Accepted: 4 March 2024 | Published: 20 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research on Influenza Viruses)
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Abstract

Background: The Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway regulates protein phosphorylation and exerts control over major cellular processes. mTOR is activated by the small G-protein Ras Homolog Enriched in Brain (Rheb), which is encoded by the Rheb1 and Rheb-like-1 (RhebL1) genes. There is currently a paucity of information on the role of RhebL1, and specifically its involvement in viral infection. In the present study we investigated the role of RhebL1 during human influenza A/NWS/33 (NWS/33) (H1N1) virus infection of rhesus monkey-kidney (LLC-MK2) cells and human type II alveolar epithelial (A549) cells. Methods: To assess the efficiency of NWS/33 virus replication, the expression of viral nucleoprotein was examined by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) and the viral yield by fifty percent tissue culture infectious dose assay. An RNA-mediated RNA interference approach was used to investigate the role of RhebL1 during NWS/33 infection. RhebL1 expression was evaluated by IIF, Western blotting, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. A two-tailed Student’s t-test was applied to evaluate differences between groups. Results: RhebL1 was differentially expressed in the cell models used in this study. Silencing of the RhebL1 gene led to increased NWS/33 virus infection in A549 cells, but not in LLC-MK2 cells. Moreover, the expression of hyperphosphorylated cytokeratin 8, a marker of NWS/33 virus infection efficiency, increased in A549 cells depleted of RhebL1 but remained almost unchanged in LLC-MK2 cells. Conclusions: These are the first results showing involvement of the endogenous RhebL1 protein during viral infection. Our data suggests that RhebL1 exerts a host cell-dependent modulatory role during influenza virus infection. RhebL1 appears to be a restrictive factor against NWS/33 virus replication in A549 cells, but not in LLC-MK2.

Keywords
influenza A virus
virus-host interaction
RhebL1 protein
small interfering RNA
phosphorylated keratin 8
restriction factor
1. Introduction

Successful virus replication relies on specific strategies to gain control of key host cell signaling pathways. The Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) is a highly conserved signaling pathway that plays a central role in consolidating the cellular physiology of all eukaryotes. It achieves this by controlling major processes such as protein synthesis, cellular growth/proliferation, and apoptosis [1, 2, 3, 4]. Hyperactivated mTOR signaling has been associated with cancer, diabetes, and the aging process [5, 6, 7].

mTOR constitutes the catalytic subunit of two distinct complexes known as mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) and mTORC2. These have different substrates and functions [7]. Specifically, mTORC1 controls the balance between anabolism and catabolism, while mTORC2 governs cytoskeletal behavior and activates various survival and proliferation pathways [3]. Both complexes integrate upstream environmental information to gate their activation. mTORC1 is activated by the small G-protein Ras Homolog Enriched in Brain (Rheb) in its GTP-bound state, which is promoted by growth factors [8]. The Ras Homolog Enriched in Brain 1 (Rheb1) and Rheb-like-1 (RhebL1) genes are encoded by Rheb [9]. Although the role of Rheb1 has been widely established [8, 10, 11], little is known regarding the involvement of RhebL1 [12]. Moreover, most previous studies have investigated the transient over-expression of RhebL1, rather than the endogenous protein [13].

The mTOR pathway plays an important role in viral replication by regulating apoptosis, cell survival, and both transcription and translation mechanisms [14, 15]. Specifically, the 1918 pandemic strain of influenza A virus requires mTORC1 activity during the early replication phases [16]. Moreover, influenza A virus modulates the levels of mTOR RNA and protein [17].

Kim et al. [18] studied the involvement of RhebL1 in keratin 8 phosphorylation and reorganization in a human type II alveolar epithelial cell line (A549). In this regard, we previously reported that influenza A/NWS/33 (NWS/33) virus induces keratin 8 hyperphosphorylation in A549 cells, thereby enhancing its replicative efficiency [19].

The rhesus monkey-kidney (LLC-MK2) (simian) and A549 (human) mammalian cell models were previously reported to show different levels of permissiveness to influenza A virus infection [19, 20]. The aim of the present study was therefore to compare the involvement of RhebL1 protein during NWS/33 virus infection in these two cell models. To achieve this, we evaluated the effect of small interfering RNA (siRNA)-mediated silencing of the RhebL1 gene on both viral replication efficiency and on the phosphorylation of keratin 8.

We found that RhebL1 was expressed at a higher level in A549 cells than in LLC-MK2 cells and has a host cell-dependent modulatory role in NWS/33 replication. More specifically, RhebL1 acts as a restriction factor against NWS/33 virus replication and keratin 8 hyperphosphorylation in A549 cells, but did not to appear to have an active modulatory role in LLC-MK2 cells.

2. Materials and Methods
2.1 Cells

A549 (TCL 101), LLC-MK2 (BS CL 57), and Madin-Darby canine-kidney (MDCK, BS CL 64) cells were obtained from the Lombardy and Emilia Romagna Experimental Zootechnic Institute (IZSLER, Brescia, Italy). Cells were cultured in either Ham’s F-12 Nutrient Mixture (A549) or Earle’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (LLC-MK2 and MDCK) containing 2 mM L-glutamine, 10% fetal bovine serum, and antibiotics (100 U/mL penicillin and 100 µg/mL streptomycin). All cell lines were validated at IZSLER by Short Tandem Repeat-DNA typing and tested negative for mycoplasma, as per international guidelines. Cells were cultured in a humidified incubator at 37 °C and 5% CO2, and culture reagents were purchased from EuroClone (Milan, Italy).

2.2 Viral Infection

Human influenza A/NWS/33 virus (H1N1; ATCC VR 219) was propagated as described previously [21]. In brief, LLC-MK2 and A549 cells were grown to confluence in shell vials or 6-well plates and then infected at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.1 and one plaque-forming unit (PFU)/cell, respectively. After adsorption for 75 min at 4 °C, the viral inoculum was removed and the cells washed twice with serum-free medium before incubation for the time indicated.

2.3 Indirect Immunofluorescence (IIF) Assays

Monolayers of LLC-MK2 and A549 cells were fixed and permeabilized in methanol for 5 min at –20 °C. The cells were then washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4; 7 mM Na2HPO4, 1.5 mM KH2PO4, 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl), blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA; PAA Laboratories GmbH, Cölbe, Germany) in PBS, and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C with primary antibodies diluted in 0.2% BSA in PBS. After three washes with PBS, the cells were incubated for 45 min at 37 °C with the secondary antibodies diluted in 0.2% BSA in PBS. For negative controls, the primary antibodies were replaced by 0.2% BSA in PBS. The cells were mounted in buffered glycerol solution (BioMérieux Italia S.p.A, Florence, Italy) and examined through an epifluorescence microscope (Leica Microsystems Srl, Milan, Italy).

For IIF assays, mouse monoclonal anti-influenza A virus nucleoprotein (NP) (1:30, BioMérieux), goat polyclonal anti-RhebL1 (1:15; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Bergheimer, Germany), and rabbit anti-phosphorylated keratin 8 on serine 431 (1:100, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) antibodies were used as described previously [19]. These antibodies were in turn detected by Alexa Fluor 568 goat anti-mouse IgG (1:500; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA), Alexa Fluor 467 donkey anti-goat IgG (1:500; Molecular Probes), and fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG (1:70; Li StarFish, Milan, Italy) antibodies, respectively.

For each cell monolayer, 10 arbitrarily selected fields were analyzed and viral NP-positive cells were expressed as the mean percentage value of the total cell number per field, as estimated by chromatin staining with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenyl-indole dihydrochloride (DAPI; 2.5 µg/mL; Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy).

2.4 Western Blotting (WB) Assays

WB assays were performed as previously described [22] on cell lysates collected from two replicate wells for each experimental condition. Mouse monoclonal anti-beta-actin IgG (1:400; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and rabbit polyclonal anti-Rheb2-N-terminal (1:300; Prodotti Gianni, Milan, Italy) antibodies were used for the WB assays. Bound antibodies were detected by anti-mouse (1:5000; Sigma-Aldrich) and anti-rabbit (1:5000; Sigma-Aldrich) IgG alkaline phosphatase-conjugated antibodies.

2.5 RNA-mediated RNA Interference

To obtain transient knockdown of the RhebL1 gene, we used siRNA (5-GCAGGAUGAGUACAGCAUU-3; 3-CGUCCUACUCAUGUCGUAA-5) and universal negative siRNA as a negative control as previously described [18]. To avoid toxicity effects induced by gene silencing, preliminary assays (data not shown) were performed to evaluate the cellular viability with trypan blue exclusion assays [19]. LLC-MK2 and A549 cells at 75% confluence in shell vials or 6-well plates were transfected for 48 h with RhebL1 siRNA (15 nM) or control siRNA (non-effective scrambled double-stranded siRNA) using MISSION® siRNA transfection reagent. All reagents for RNA-mediated RNA interference were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.

2.6 Fifty Percent Tissue Culture Infectious Dose (TCID50) Assay

The viral yields in culture supernatants from MDCK cells were assessed as previously reported [23].

2.7 Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)

To quantify RhebL1 protein, the human RHEBL1 (GTPase RhebL1) ELISA kit was employed according to the manufacturer’s guidelines (Fine Biotech Co., Wuhan, Hubei, China). First, a standard curve was created using a standard control and starting at a protein concentration of 1000 pg/mL, followed by 2-fold serial dilutions from 1/2 to 1/64. The RhebL1 concentration in samples was calculated based on the standard curve. Briefly, 100 µL of sample (or prepared standard points) was added to each dedicated well of a 96-well plate. This was sealed and incubated for 90 minutes at 37 °C, after which the plate was washed twice and 100 µL of biotin-labeled antibody working solution was added to each well. The plate was then sealed and incubated again for 60 minutes at 37 °C. After three washes, 100 µL of horseradish peroxidase-streptavidin conjugate working solution was added to each well before sealing the plate and incubating for 30 minutes at 37 °C. In the last step, the plate was washed five times and 90 µL of tetramethylbenzidine substrate solution was then added to each well. The plate was once again sealed and incubated for 15 minutes at 37 °C. Finally, 50 µL of stop solution was added to each well and the optical density (OD) absorbance at 450 nm was immediately read.

Regarding the OD calculation, the relative OD absorbance at 450 nm was obtained with the following formula:

relative OD450 = (OD450 of each well) – (OD450 of blank well)

The standard curve was plotted as the relative OD450 of each standard point (Y-axis) versus each respective concentration (X-axis). The RhebL1 concentration of each sample was interpolated from the standard curve.

2.8 Statistical Analysis

GraphPad Prism software ​(Version 10.0.0 (153), GraphPad Software LLC, Boston, MA, USA) was employed for the statistical analysis. A two-tailed Student’s t-test was used to evaluate differences between cells under study. p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results
3.1 Differential RhebL1 Expression in Uninfected and Influenza A/NWS/33 Virus-infected LLC-MK2 and A549 Cells

The expression and cellular distribution of endogenous RhebL1 protein was first examined with the IIF assay in LLC-MK2 and A549 cells (Fig. 1A,B). RhebL1 expression was lower in uninfected LLC-MK2 cells than uninfected A549 cells. Furthermore, RhebL1 showed diffuse staining with prevalent accumulation in the perinuclear region (see insets in Fig. 1A,B).

Fig. 1.

Analysis of Ras Homolog Enriched in Brain Like-1 (RhebL1) expression in uninfected and human influenza A/NWS/33 (NWS/33)-infected rhesus monkey-kidney (LLC-MK2) and A549 cells. RhebL1 protein expression in uninfected LLC-MK2 cells (A) and A549 cells (B) was investigated using indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) assays. Images were recorded with a conventional fluorescence microscope. Scale bar = 20 µm. (A,B) The insets shown at the bottom of each figure represent the higher magnification (2000×) of the cell/s included within the frame shown in the microscopic field. (C) Quantitative evaluation of RhebL1 in uninfected and NWS/33-infected (multiplicity of infection (MOI) = 1 PFU/cell, 24 h infection) LLC-MK2 cells and A549 cells, as determined by Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). Values represent the mean of three independent experiments. Error bars in the graphs represent the standard deviation. * p = 0.037.

ELISA was used to determine the concentration of RhebL1 in cellular homogenates of either uninfected or NWS/33-infected (MOI = 1 PFU/cell, 24 h) LLC-MK2 and A549 cells (Fig. 1C). The results showed much higher expression of RhebL1 in uninfected A549 cells than in uninfected LLC-MK2 cells. NWS/33 virus infection did not alter the RhebL1 concentration in LLC-MK2 cells, but caused a significant decrease in A549 cells.

3.2 RhebL1 Gene Silencing Increases Influenza A/NWS/33 Virus Replication in A549 Cells but not in LLC-MK2 Cells

Next, we used an RNA-mediated RNA interference approach to study the effect of RhebL1 depletion on NWS/33 virus infection in LLC-MK2 and A549 cells, as described in the Methods section. The effectiveness of RhebL1 depletion in both models was first assessed by WB (Fig. 2A).

Fig. 2.

RhebL1 protein restricts productive NWS/33 virus infection in A549 cells. (A–C) LLC-MK2 and A549 cells were treated for 48 h with either control siRNA or RNA-mediated interference against RhebL1. (A) RhebL1 expression in LLC-MK2 and A549 cells was evaluated by Western blotting (WB), with beta-actin used as the protein loading control. (B) Histogram showing the percentage of viral NP-positive LLC-MK2 and A549 cells following treatment for 48 h with either control siRNA or RhebL1 siRNA, as evaluated by IIF after infection with NWS/33 virus (MOI = 0.1 PFU/cell, 24 h). (C) The viral yields in the supernatants of LLC-MK2 and A549 cells were evaluated by the fifty percent tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50) assay in MDCK cells. Values represent the mean of two independent experiments. Error bars represent the standard deviation. * p = 0.0056 in (B) and * p = 0.0458 in (C). n.s. p = 0.189 in (B) and n.s. p = 0.4198 in (C). n.s., not statistically significant.

Subsequently, the control cells and cells depleted of RhebL1 were infected with NWS/33 virus (MOI = 0.1 PFU/cell, 24 h) prior to the IIF assay. Compared to control cells, the percentage of viral NP-positive cells increased significantly in A549 cells depleted of RhebL1, as shown in Fig. 2B. Conversely, depletion of RhebL1 in LLC-MK2 cells had no effect, or only a slightly negative effect on NWS/33 virus infection. Using the TCID50 assay, we also investigated the effect of RhebL1 depletion on the emergence of viral progeny. As shown in Fig. 2C, the results were consistent with those of IIF.

3.3 RhebL1 Gene Silencing Increases the Expression of Phosphorylated Keratin 8 in A549 Cells

We previously reported that NWS/33 virus infection can stimulate hyperphosphorylation of keratin 8 on serine 431, thereby promoting virus replication in A549 cells but not in LLC-MK2 cells [19]. In view of the involvement of RhebL1 in keratin 8 phosphorylation in A549 cells [18], we next evaluated the effect of RhebL1 gene silencing on the expression of phosphorylated keratin 8 in both cell models.

To this end, control cells and cells depleted of RhebL1 were examined by IIF (Fig. 3A–D). No apparent changes in the expression of phosphorylated keratin 8 were observed in LLC-MK2 cells (see Fig. 3B vs. 3A). In contrast, increased expression and perinuclear accumulation of phosphorylated keratin 8 were observed in A549 cell monolayers (see arrows in Fig. 3D).

Fig. 3.

RhebL1 protein restricts the expression of phosphorylated keratin 8 in A549 cells. LLC-MK2 and A549 cells were treated for 48 h with control siRNA (A,C) or with RNA-mediated interference (B,D). The expression of phosphorylated keratin 8 in LLC-MK2 cells (A,B) and in A549 cells (C,D) was then visualized by IIF. Images were recorded using a conventional fluorescence microscope. Scale bar = 20 µm.

4. Discussion

Viruses are master manipulators of cell functions and can hijack key signaling pathways to modulate cell survival and ensure their replication. Since the mTOR signaling pathway is located at the crossroads of several fundamental cellular pathways, many viruses have developed specific mechanisms that target this major biological switch, thereby inducing metabolic reprogramming [24, 25].

The focus of the present study was on RhebL1, one of the modulators of the mTOR pathway, as to our knowledge there is no data regarding the involvement of this protein in viral infection. Several lines of evidence have implicated the mTOR pathway in viral infection. The influenza A virus is thought to induce autophagy by overwhelming the mTOR pathway, thereby leading to its successful replication [26, 27, 28]. Furthermore, the respiratory syncytial virus induces autophagy and suppresses the mTOR pathway to evade the host’s immune defenses, thus favoring its survival within the host [29]. Arunachalam et al. [30] also reported the mTOR pathway was downregulated in the plasmacytoid cells of subjects with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Conversely, Appelberg et al. [31] showed that replication of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) increased mTOR signaling, thereby ensuring the translation of viral proteins and allowing viral assembly [32].

The aim of this study was to evaluate the involvement of the RhebL1 protein, an activator of the mTOR pathway, during NWS/33 virus infection in two mammalian cell models with different levels of permissivity [19, 20].

RhebL1 is highly expressed in cells of the nervous system [33] and in other tissues [34], suggesting it has essential regulatory roles in a variety of cell types. The present study found a much higher level of RhebL1 expression in human A549 cells than in monkey LLC-MK2 cells. Given this differential expression, it is conceivable that RhebL1 performs different types of regulatory functions in these two cell models.

Specifically, RhebL1 has been shown to interact with molecules that activate signal transduction pathways for different protein kinases, including the phosphorylation of keratin [13, 18, 35, 36, 37, 38]. Similar to the effect of chemical activators of phosphorylation [19], RhebL1 gene silencing was shown to significantly increase the replication cycle of NWS/33 virus and the phosphorylation of keratin 8 in A549 cells, contrary to what is observed in LLC-MK2 cells.

Keratin 8 phosphorylation plays a significant role in regulating keratin filament organization, associations with binding proteins, and modulation of the cell cycle. Previous studies have emphasized the role of phosphorylation in viral pathogenesis. In this regard, Padilla-Mendoza et al. [39] focused on the expression of phosphorylated proteins, including keratin 8, and their association with the progression of cervical lesions caused by papillomavirus. Toivola et al. [40] demonstrated that site-specific keratin 8 phosphorylation is a marker of the progression of liver diseases caused by hepatitis C virus. We previously reported that increased keratin 8 phosphorylation on serine 431 favored virus replication during influenza A virus infection of A549 cells [19].

RhebL1 was recently found to induce robust phosphorylation of interferon regulatory factor 3, thereby acting as a trigger of innate immunity [41]. In this regard, our data indicates that RhebL1 has a negative regulatory role on NWS/33 virus infection in permissive A549 cells. Accordingly, we observed a significant decrease in virus-induced expression of RhebL1 at 24 h after NWS/33 virus infection in A549 cells, but not in LLC-MK2 cells. Moreover, RhebL1 gene silencing stimulated NWS/33 virus replication in A549 cells, but not in LLC-MK2 cells. Hence, we speculate that downregulation of RhebL1 in A549 cells might help the NWS/33 virus to decrease the activity of the host biosynthetic machinery, while favoring viral transcription and protein synthesis. This concurs with previous data showing that mTOR suppression during PR8 influenza virus infection increased viral transcription [42]. Ranadheera et al. [16] also observed downregulation of the mTOR pathway at early time points during influenza H1N1 (1918 strain) virus infection. However, this reverted to a steady state level at later post-infection time points, allowing the production of viral progeny.

With regard to the modulatory effects of RhebL1 and the possible impacts on virus infection, Yuan et al. [34] also reported a relationship with NF-kappa B-mediated gene transcription. Downregulation of RhebL1 induced by either viral infection or gene silencing could repress cellular antiviral responses triggered by NF-kappa B, as previously observed during influenza virus infection [43, 44].

5. Conclusions

Understanding the effects of host cell metabolic status on virus replication helps to identify mediators of viral tropism and to explain why some cells are more prone to virus infection than others. This is the first report on the host cell-dependent regulatory role of RhebL1 protein during influenza A virus infection. Our study has revealed new information on the complex metabolic landscape of cells infected with the influenza virus. This is worthy of further investigation with a view to developing broad-range antiviral therapies.

Abbreviations

A549, human type II alveolar epithelial; ACRYL, acrylamide; BSA, bovine serum albumin; DAPI, 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride; IIF, indirect immunofluorescence; LLC-MK2, rhesus monkey-kidney; MDCK, Madin-Darby canine-kidney; MOI, the multiplicity of infection; mTOR, Mammalian Target of Rapamycin; NP, nucleoprotein; n.s., not statistically significant; NWS/33 virus, human influenza A/NWS/33 virus; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PFU, plaque-forming units; p.i., post-infection; Rheb1, Ras Homolog Enriched in Brain 1; RhebL1, Ras Homolog Enriched in Brain Like-1; siRNA, small interfering RNA; TCID50, fifty % tissue culture infectious dose; WB, Western blotting.

Availability of Data and Materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Author Contributions

FDC designed the research study. MB and FDC performed the research. MB and FDC analyzed the data. MB and FDC wrote the manuscript. Both authors contributed to editorial changes in the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript. Both authors have participated sufficiently in the work and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Acknowledgment

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by grants allocated to Flora De Conto by the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (MIUR) (“Fondo per il finanziamento delle attività di base di ricerca (FFABR) – 2017”). The founders had no role in the study design, data collection, and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References
[1]
Fingar DC, Blenis J. Target of rapamycin (TOR): an integrator of nutrient and growth factor signals and coordinator of cell growth and cell cycle progression. Oncogene. 2004; 23: 3151–3171.
[2]
Hay N, Sonenberg N. Upstream and downstream of mTOR. Genes & Development. 2004; 18: 1926–1945.
[3]
Liu GY, Sabatini DM. mTOR at the nexus of nutrition, growth, ageing and disease. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology. 2020; 21: 183–203.
[4]
Marques-Ramos A, Cervantes R. Expression of mTOR in normal and pathological conditions. Molecular Cancer. 2023; 22: 112.
[5]
Lu ZH, Shvartsman MB, Lee AY, Shao JM, Murray MM, Kladney RD, et al. Mammalian target of rapamycin activator RHEB is frequently overexpressed in human carcinomas and is critical and sufficient for skin epithelial carcinogenesis. Cancer Research. 2010; 70: 3287–3298.
[6]
Oh WJ, Jacinto E. mTOR complex 2 signaling and functions. Cell Cycle (Georgetown, Tex.). 2011; 10: 2305–2316.
[7]
Laplante M, Sabatini DM. mTOR signaling in growth control and disease. Cell. 2012; 149: 274–293.
[8]
Long X, Lin Y, Ortiz-Vega S, Yonezawa K, Avruch J. Rheb binds and regulates the mTOR kinase. Current Biology: CB. 2005; 15: 702–713.
[9]
Patel PH, Thapar N, Guo L, Martinez M, Maris J, Gau CL, et al. Drosophila Rheb GTPase is required for cell cycle progression and cell growth. Journal of Cell Science. 2003; 116: 3601–3610.
[10]
Bai X, Ma D, Liu A, Shen X, Wang QJ, Liu Y, et al. Rheb activates mTOR by antagonizing its endogenous inhibitor, FKBP38. Science (New York, N.Y.). 2007; 318: 977–980.
[11]
Hanrahan J, Blenis J. Rheb activation of mTOR and S6K1 signaling. Methods in Enzymology. 2006; 407: 542–555.
[12]
Tee AR, Blenis J, Proud CG. Analysis of mTOR signaling by the small G-proteins, Rheb and RhebL1. FEBS Letters. 2005; 579: 4763–4768.
[13]
Bonneau A, Parmar N. Effects of RhebL1 silencing on the mTOR pathway. Molecular Biology Reports. 2012; 39: 2129–2137.
[14]
Buchkovich NJ, Yu Y, Zampieri CA, Alwine JC. The TORrid affairs of viruses: effects of mammalian DNA viruses on the PI3K-Akt-mTOR signalling pathway. Nature Reviews. Microbiology. 2008; 6: 266–275.
[15]
Cooray S. The pivotal role of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-Akt signal transduction in virus survival. The Journal of General Virology. 2004; 85: 1065–1076.
[16]
Ranadheera C, Coombs KM, Kobasa D. Comprehending a Killer: The Akt/mTOR Signaling Pathways Are Temporally High-Jacked by the Highly Pathogenic 1918 Influenza Virus. EBioMedicine. 2018; 32: 142–163.
[17]
Sharma S, Chatterjee A, Kumar P, Lal S, Kondabagil K. Upregulation of miR-101 during Influenza A Virus Infection Abrogates Viral Life Cycle by Targeting mTOR Pathway. Viruses. 2020; 12: 444.
[18]
Kim HJ, Byun HJ, Park MK, Kim EJ, Kang GJ, Lee CH. Novel involvement of RhebL1 in sphingosylphosphorylcholine-induced keratin phosphorylation and reorganization: Binding to and activation of AKT1. Oncotarget. 2017; 8: 20851–20864.
[19]
De Conto F, Conversano F, Razin SV, Belletti S, Arcangeletti MC, Chezzi C, et al. Host-cell dependent role of phosphorylated keratin 8 during influenza A/NWS/33 virus (H1N1) infection in mammalian cells. Virus Research. 2021; 295: 198333.
[20]
De Conto F, Chezzi C, Fazzi A, Razin SV, Arcangeletti MC, Medici MC, et al. Proteasomes raise the microtubule dynamics in influenza A (H1N1) virus-infected LLC-MK2 cells. Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters. 2015; 20: 840–866.
[21]
Arcangeletti MC, De Conto F, Ferraglia F, Pinardi F, Gatti R, Orlandini G, et al. Host-cell-dependent role of actin cytoskeleton during the replication of a human strain of influenza A virus. Archives of Virology. 2008; 153: 1209–1221.
[22]
De Conto F, Fazzi A, Razin SV, Arcangeletti MC, Medici MC, Belletti S, et al. Mammalian Diaphanous-related formin-1 restricts early phases of influenza A/NWS/33 virus (H1N1) infection in LLC-MK2 cells by affecting cytoskeleton dynamics. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry. 2018; 437: 185–201.
[23]
De Conto F, Di Lonardo E, Arcangeletti MC, Chezzi C, Medici MC, Calderaro A. Highly dynamic microtubules improve the effectiveness of early stages of human influenza A/NWS/33 virus infection in LLC-MK2 cells. PloS One. 2012; 7: e41207.
[24]
Pant A, Dsouza L, Yang Z. Alteration in Cellular Signaling and Metabolic Reprogramming during Viral Infection. mBio. 2021; 12: e0063521.
[25]
Dunn EF, Connor JH. HijAkt: The PI3K/Akt pathway in virus replication and pathogenesis. Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science. 2012; 106: 223–250.
[26]
Ma J, Sun Q, Mi R, Zhang H. Avian influenza A virus H5N1 causes autophagy-mediated cell death through suppression of mTOR signaling. Journal of Genetics and Genomics = Yi Chuan Xue Bao. 2011; 38: 533–537.
[27]
Zhang RH, Zhang HL, Li PY, Li CH, Gao JP, Li J, et al. Autophagy is involved in the replication of H9N2 influenza virus via the regulation of oxidative stress in alveolar epithelial cells. Virology Journal. 2021; 18: 22.
[28]
Zhang RH, Zhang HL, Li PY, Gao JP, Luo Q, Liang T, et al. Autophagy is involved in the acute lung injury induced by H9N2 influenza virus. International Immunopharmacology. 2019; 74: 105737.
[29]
Shuchi S, Ratho RK, Mohi GK, Kumar Angurana S, Sarkar S, Jangra I. Modulation of autophagy and mTOR signaling pathway genes in respiratory epithelium by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in children suffering from acute lower respiratory tract infections. Journal of Medical Virology. 2023; 95: e28666.
[30]
Arunachalam PS, Wimmers F, Mok CKP, Perera RAPM, Scott M, Hagan T, et al. Systems biological assessment of immunity to mild versus severe COVID-19 infection in humans. Science (New York, N.Y.). 2020; 369: 1210–1220.
[31]
Appelberg S, Gupta S, Svensson Akusjärvi S, Ambikan AT, Mikaeloff F, Saccon E, et al. Dysregulation in Akt/mTOR/HIF-1 signaling identified by proteo-transcriptomics of SARS-CoV-2 infected cells. Emerging Microbes & Infections. 2020; 9: 1748–1760.
[32]
Zambalde ÉP, Dias TL, Maktura GC, Amorim MR, Brenha B, Santos LN, et al. Increased mTOR Signaling and Impaired Autophagic Flux Are Hallmarks of SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2022; 45: 327–336.
[33]
Parmar N, Bonneau A. Production and characterization of a highly specific and potent antibody capable of detecting endogenous RhebL1 protein in mammalian tissues and cell lines. Journal of Biotech Research. 2010; 2: 21–33.
[34]
Yuan J, Shan Y, Chen X, Tang W, Luo K, Ni J, et al. Identification and characterization of RHEBL1, a novel member of Ras family, which activates transcriptional activities of NF-kappa B. Molecular Biology Reports. 2005; 32: 205–214.
[35]
Busch T, Armacki M, Eiseler T, Joodi G, Temme C, Jansen J, et al. Keratin 8 phosphorylation regulates keratin reorganization and migration of epithelial tumor cells. Journal of Cell Science. 2012; 125: 2148–2159.
[36]
Park MK, Lee HJ, Shin J, Noh M, Kim SY, Lee CH. Novel participation of transglutaminase-2 through c-Jun N-terminal kinase activation in sphingosylphosphorylcholine-induced keratin reorganization of PANC-1 cells. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2011; 1811: 1021–1029.
[37]
Bonneau AR, Parmar NS. Double knockdown of the Rheb gene in mammalian cells using RNA interference. The FASEB Journal [Internet]. 2011; 25: 899.1–899.1.
[38]
Zou J, Zhou L, Du XX, Ji Y, Xu J, Tian J, et al. Rheb1 is required for mTORC1 and myelination in postnatal brain development. Developmental Cell. 2011; 20: 97–108.
[39]
Padilla-Mendoza JR, Contis-Montes de Oca A, Rodríguez MA, López-Casamichana M, Bolaños J, Quintas-Granados LI, et al. Protein Phosphorylation in Serine Residues Correlates with Progression from Precancerous Lesions to Cervical Cancer in Mexican Patients. BioMed Research International. 2020; 2020: 5058928.
[40]
Toivola DM, Ku NO, Resurreccion EZ, Nelson DR, Wright TL, Omary MB. Keratin 8 and 18 hyperphosphorylation is a marker of progression of human liver disease. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.). 2004; 40: 459–466.
[41]
Yu JH, Moon EY, Kim J, Koo JH. Identification of Small GTPases That Phosphorylate IRF3 through TBK1 Activation Using an Active Mutant Library Screen. Biomolecules & Therapeutics. 2023; 31: 48–58.
[42]
Yeganeh B, Ghavami S, Rahim MN, Klonisch T, Halayko AJ, Coombs KM. Autophagy activation is required for influenza A virus-induced apoptosis and replication. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. Molecular Cell Research. 2018; 1865: 364–378.
[43]
Hu J, Kong M, Cui Z, Gao Z, Ma C, Hu Z, et al. PA-X protein of H5N1 avian influenza virus inhibits NF-kappaB activity, a potential mechanism for PA-X counteracting the host innate immune responses. Veterinary Microbiology. 2020; 250: 108838.
[44]
Lee MC, Yu CP, Chen XH, Liu MT, Yang JR, Chen AY, et al. Influenza A virus NS1 protein represses antiviral immune response by hijacking NF-κB to mediate transcription of type III IFN. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 2022; 12: 998584.

Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share
Back to top