IMR Press / JIN / Volume 23 / Issue 4 / DOI: 10.31083/j.jin2304077
Open Access Systematic Review
Thalamic Alterations in Motor Neuron Diseases: A Systematic Review of MRI Findings
Show Less
1 Department of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, 14496 14535 Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Neuroscience and Addiction Studies, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 14177 55469 Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 14176 13151 Tehran, Iran
4 Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, 14496 14535 Tehran, Iran
5 Department of Radiology, Imam Khomeini Hospital of Piranshahr, 57818 33318 Piranshahr, Iran
*Correspondence: s_ghaderi@razi.tums.ac.ir (Sadegh Ghaderi)
J. Integr. Neurosci. 2024, 23(4), 77; https://doi.org/10.31083/j.jin2304077
Submitted: 17 November 2023 | Revised: 3 January 2024 | Accepted: 9 January 2024 | Published: 10 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Brain Imaging-Volume II)
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Abstract

Background: Motor neuron diseases (MNDs) are progressive neurodegenerative disorders characterized by motor impairment and non-motor symptoms. The involvement of the thalamus in MNDs, especially in conditions such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and its interaction with frontotemporal dementia (FTD), has garnered increasing research interest. This systematic review analyzed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies that focused on thalamic alterations in MNDs to understand the significance of these changes and their correlation with clinical outcomes. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, the PubMed and Scopus databases were searched from inception to June 2023 for studies related to MRI findings in the thalamus of patients with MNDs. Eligible studies included adult patients diagnosed with ALS or other forms of MND who underwent brain MRI, with outcomes related to thalamic alterations. Studies were evaluated for risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Results: A total of 52 studies (including 3009 MND patients and 2181 healthy controls) used various MRI techniques, including volumetric analysis, diffusion tensor imaging, and functional MRI, to measure thalamic volume, connectivity, and other alterations. This review confirmed significant thalamic changes in MNDs, such as atrophy and microstructural degradation, which are associated with disease severity, progression, and functional disability. Thalamic involvement varies across different MND subtypes and is influenced by the presence of cognitive impairment and mutations in genes including chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9orf72). The synthesis of findings across studies indicates that thalamic pathology is a prevalent early biomarker of MNDs that contributes to motor and cognitive deficits. The thalamus is a promising target for monitoring as its dysfunction underpins a variety of clinical symptoms in MNDs. Conclusions: Thalamic alterations provide valuable insights into the pathophysiology and progression of MNDs. Multimodal MRI techniques are potent tools for detecting dynamic thalamic changes, indicating structural integrity, connectivity disruption, and metabolic activity.

Keywords
motor neuron disease
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
MRI
thalamus
biomarkers
1. Introduction

Motor neuron diseases (MNDs) are a group of neurodegenerative disorders characterized by progressive neurodegeneration of motor neurons that lead to muscle weakness and disability, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), primary lateral sclerosis (PLS), spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), and others [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. ALS is the most common and severe form of MND and can affect both upper and lower motor neurons (UMNs and LMNs), with a median survival of 3–5 years after diagnosis [6, 7, 8]. MNDs are not only characterized by motor impairment but also by non-motor symptoms such as cognitive and behavioral alterations [9, 10, 11].

In recent years, the thalamus has been increasingly recognized as a crucial structure involved in the pathophysiology of MNDs [1, 12]. The thalamus serves as a relay center for motor, sensory, and cognitive information, and thalamic dysfunction contributes to a variety of motor and non-motor symptoms in MNDs, including muscle weakness, spasticity, and cognitive decline [13, 14, 15]. Recently, Ghaderi et al. [11] (2023) conducted a systematic review of memory-related impairments in ALS, emphasizing the role of the thalamus in cognitive functions and processes. The thalamus consists of multiple nuclei that modulate distinct neural circuits through connections with the cortex and subcortex [16, 17]. In MND, specific thalamic nuclei implicated in motor, sensory, cognitive, and limbic processing undergo significant degeneration [18, 19].

Another important aspect of thalamic pathology in MNDs is the interaction with frontotemporal dementia (FTD), a common comorbidity of MNDs [20, 21]. FTD covers a group of neurodegenerative diseases affecting the frontal and temporal lobes of the brain, leading to progressive changes in behavior, language, and executive function [22, 23]. FTD is classified into three main subtypes: behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD), primary progressive aphasia of the semantic variant (svPPA), and non-fluent/analogue variant PPA (nfvPPA) [24, 25, 26]. Each FTD variant is associated with distinct patterns of cortical atrophy and cognitive deficits as well as different degrees of thalamic involvement. In MNDs, particularly ALS, a significant subset of patients develop FTD-like cognitive and behavioral impairments, further complicating the clinical presentation and prognosis [27, 28]. Moreover, thalamic changes may reflect the underlying molecular pathology of FTD, such as the presence of chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9orf72) or transactivation response DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) mutations [29, 30, 31]. Investigating the thalamus in MNDs with and without FTD may therefore help to elucidate the mechanisms and consequences of this complex interaction [31, 32].

Advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques, such as volumetric analyses [33], diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) [34, 35, 36], and functional MRI (fMRI) [34], have enabled the in vivo assessment of thalamic structure and function in MNDs, providing valuable insights into the pathophysiology and progression of these diseases [37, 38, 39]. However, despite the increasing evidence regarding thalamic alterations in MNDs gained using advanced MRI techniques, there is a lack of comprehensive syntheses of the current literature on this topic. Previous reviews have focused on specific aspects of thalamic pathology or specific MND subtypes but not on the overall picture of thalamic involvement in different MNDs. We aimed to analyze the MRI results of the included studies to assess the overall significance of thalamic alterations in MND. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge regarding thalamic involvement in MNDs and outlines the development of innovative diagnostic, targeted therapeutic, and translational imaging strategies.

2. Materials and Methods
2.1 Search Strategy and Eligibility Criteria

We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement to conduct and report this systematic review [40] (Supplementary Material). We searched the PubMed and Scopus electronic databases from their inception to June 2023. We used a combination of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and free-text words to construct our search strategy. The search terms were related to MRI, the thalamus, ALS, MND, and all other forms of MND. We also checked the reference lists of relevant articles and reviews for additional studies. We included studies that involved adult patients (18 years) diagnosed with ALS according to the revised El Escorial criteria (EEC), who underwent brain MRI using either conventional or advanced methods or techniques, and who were compared with healthy controls (HCs) or those with other neurological diseases. These studies had to report MRI-based biomarkers of thalamic alterations as outcomes and could have any observational or experimental design, such as cross-sectional, longitudinal, or comparative studies. We did not consider studies that featured MRI scans of the spinal cord or other body parts, or those that used MRI-based biomarkers to evaluate brain regions or non-MRI biomarkers as outcomes. We also excluded reviews, meta-analyses, case reports, letters, editorials, conference abstracts, and non-English-language studies.

2.2 Data Collection and Risk of Bias

We used a two-stage process to select and extract data from eligible studies. In the first stage, five reviewers (ZNAP, RK, FM, SMJ, and MM) screened the titles and abstracts of the retrieved records and obtained the full texts of potentially eligible records. In the second stage, the two reviewers (SM and SG) extracted data from the included studies using a standardized data extraction form. The data included general information, study characteristics, and alterations in thalamus outcomes. Any disagreements between the reviewers were resolved by discussion or consultation with a fifth reviewer (SG). We contacted the authors of the original studies for missing or unclear data. Two reviewers (SG and SM) independently evaluated the risk of bias in the included studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale checklist [41].

3. Results
3.1 Selected studies

A systematic review of 52 studies was conducted (Fig. 1 and Table 1 (Ref. [21, 31, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91])). These studies included 3009 patients with MNDs and 2181 HCs. We reviewed the findings of these studies that used MRI to investigate thalamic alterations in patients with MNDs.

Fig. 1.

Flow diagram outlining the study selection process using the PRISMA guideline. PRISMA, preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MND, motor neuron disease.

Table 1.Thalamic alteration findings using MRI techniques.
Technique First author (Year) Subjects [Patients/Controls] MND [Types] MRI [Field Strength/Coils] Thalamic findings
T1-w McKenna (2023) [21] 70/100 10 bvFTD, 15 nfvPPA, 5 svPPA 3T Thalamic atrophy patterns vary by nuclei and methods
20 ALS-FTD C9+ Vertex analyses thalamic atrophy patterns
20 ALS-FTD C9– Morphometric analyses focal intra-thalamic degeneration
Dieckmann (2022) [42] 100/72 ALS 1.5T/4 GMV and rD50 in bilateral thalamus
GMV cFL in the right thalamus
GMV cFS in bilateral thalamus
Subcortical volumes and rD50 in bilateral thalamus
GM atrophy in the thalamus and cortex
Ahmed (2021) [43] 151/58 58 bvFTD, 41 ALS-FTD, 52 ALS 3T/8 Subcortical volume in ALS-FTD
Thalamic atrophy in ALS-FTD > ALS
Thalamic volume ACE-III and cognitive subdomains
Thalamic volume poorer TMT performance
Liu (2021) [44] 76/94 ALS 3T/dStream head coil Thalamic atrophy in ALS at King’s stage 3
Chipika (2020) [45] 133/117 100 ALS, 33 PLS 3T/8 ALS C9+ mediodorsal-paratenial-reuniens thalamic nuclei atrophy
PLS sensory and lateral geniculate thalamic atrophy
Genotype-specific thalamic pattern in ALS and PLS
Finegan (2020) [46] 133/117 100 ALS, 33 PLS 3T/8 Thalamic atrophy in PLS
Chipika (2020) [47] 133/117 88 ALS C9–, 12 ALS C9+, 33 PLS 3T/8 Motor and sensory thalamic atrophy in ALS C9– and PLS
Mediodorsal peritoneal-reuniens thalamic atrophy in ALS C9–, ALS C9+, and PLS
Pulvinar and lateral geniculate thalamic atrophy in PLS > ALS C9–
Ventral lateral and ventral anterior of thalamic pathology reflects extrapyramidal dysfunction in MND
Johns (2019) [48] 17/18 ALS 4.7T Autocorrelation in the left thalamus differs in patients and HCs
Finegan (2019) [49] 133/117 100 ALS, 33 PLS 3T/8 Thalamic atrophy in PLS by volumetric and vertex analyses
Medial thalamic atrophy in PLS > ALS
Bede (2018) [50] 88/50 10 bvFTD, 11 nfvPPA, 5 svPPA, 14 ALS-FTD C9+, 12 ALS-FTD C9–, 36 ALSnci 3T/8 Density in motor and sensory thalamus in ALS-FTD C9+
Branco (2018) [51] 54/38 12 ALSci, 14 ALSbi, 28 ALSni 3T/16 Left thalamic volume in ALSci > ALSni
Left thalamic volume cognitive performance
Left thalamic volume ≠ motor-functional parameters
Bocchetta (2018) [31] 341/99 141 bvFTD, 76 SD 1.5T and 3T Thalamic atrophy in all FTD subtypes > controls
103 PNFA, 7 FTD-MND, 14 PPA-NOS Thalamic atrophy in FTD-MND > other FTD subtypes
Bertrand (2018) [52] 80 participants 41 ALS C9+, 39 ALS C9– 3T Atrophy in the right thalamus
Devenney (2017) [53] 56/23 20 ALS-FTD, 36 bvFTD 3T Psychotic symptoms in ALS-FTD C9+ thalamic atrophy
Masuda (2016) [54] 51/24 25 ALSCD, 7 ALS-FTD, 19 ALS 3T Thalamic atrophy in ALS-FTD
Westeneng (2016) [55] 170/90 165 ALS C9–, 14 ALS C9+ 3T Cortical thinning and thalamic atrophy in C9+
Bede (2016) [56] 70/40 ALS 3T/8 Thalamic atrophy in ALS by volumetric and vertex analyses
Superior and inferior thalamic atrophy in ALS by vertex analyses
de Albuquerque (2016) [57] 32/32 ALS 3T/8 CO and IDM in bilateral thalamus in ALS
DGN alterations in the thalamus in ALS by TA
Right thalamic atrophy in ALS by DGN volume
ROI homogeneity in thalamus and right caudate in ALS
Machts (2015) [58] 67/39 7 ALS-FTD, 18 ALS-plus, 42 ALSnci 3T/32 Thalamic volume and shape loss in ALS-FTD
Anterior, ventral, and lateral thalamic atrophy in ALS-FTD
Thalamic atrophy cognitive and behavioral deficits in ALS-FTD
McMillan (2015) [59] 20/25 ALS 3T/8 Right thalamic atrophy and GM density C9orf72 methylation
C9orf72 methylation faster thalamic atrophy
Hypermethylation protects the thalamus from C9orf72 mutation
Thalamic GM decline in C9orf72 patients
Menke (2014) [60] 36/36 ALS 3T/12 Total GM in thalamus
Lillo (2012) [61] 35/18 10 ALS, 10 ALS-FTD, 10 bvFTD 3T Thalamic atrophy in bvFTD > ALS-FTD > ALS
Sha (2012) [62] 104/64 15 bvFTD C9+, 11 FTD-MND C9+, 5 ALS CP+ 1.5T, 3T, and 4T Thalamic atrophy in C9+ FTD-MND > C9– FTD-MND by VBM
48 bvFTD C9–, 19 FTD-MND C9–, 6 ALS C9– Longer survival in C9+ FTD-MND with slower progression
Right thalamic atrophy in C9+ FTD-MND > C9– FTD-MND and controls
Rohrer (2010) [63] 28 (4 FTD-MND)/50 9 with type 1, 5 with type 2, and 10 with type 3 FTLD-TDP (MND in type 2 and 3) 1.5T Type 3 with asymmetric atrophy in the thalamus
Tartaglia (2009) [64] 11/10 PLS 1.5T Thalamic atrophy in PLS > HCs
Thalamic volume with age in controls
Chang (2005) [65] 20/22 10 ALS, 10 ALS-FTLD 1.5T/ quadrature head coil Left posterior thalamic GM atrophy in ALS and ALS-FTLD > HC
Left posterior thalamic GM atrophy in ALS-FTLD > ALS
DTI El Mendili (2022) [66] 29/24 13 fast and 16 slow progressors 3T/32 MD in the left thalamic radiation in fast progressor
FA in the left thalamic radiation in slow progressor
Trojsi (2019) [67] 36/35 ALS phenotype: 14 classic, 2 bulbar, 10 flail arms, 10 flail leg 3T/8 AD in the mediodorsal nucleus of the thalamus memory impairment in ALS
AD , MD , RD in the left mediodorsal nucleus of the thalamus ECAS subscores (memory, visuospatial abilities)
ALS non-specific total score (memory, visuospatial domains) AD, associated with axonal damage, in the left thalamus
Memory subscore MD / RD in the left mediodorsal nucleus of thalamus and genu, anterior body and splenium of CC
AD, MD, RD in the left mediodorsal thalamus ALS non-specific total score and memory subscore, likely due to the role of this nucleus in cortico-thalamo-cortical connections
No significant atrophy of the thalamus in ALS group compared with HCs
Zhang (2017) [68] 38/35 ALS phenotype: 7 bulbar, 30 limb, 1 bulbar and limb 3T/8 Thalamocortical pathways PMC and M1 impaired in ALS
Barbagallo (2014) [69] 26/22 ALS 3T/8 MD in the thalamus was in patients compared with controls
Disease duration MD in the thalamus
ALSFRS-R score MD in the thalamus
Bede (2014) [70] 27/42 ALS 3T/8 Male sex FA in the thalamus
Sharma (2013) [71] 14/12 ALS phenotype: 12 limb, 2 bulbar 3T/8 MD, AD, RD, and FA in the thalamus of ALS patients compared with HCs
Sach (2004) [72] 15/12 9 ALS, 6 no UMN 1.5T FA in the right thalamus
fMRI Dey (2023) [73] 52/52 ALS 3T/20 and 32 FC of PMC with right dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and left thalamus decline in ALS patients
Xu (2017) [74] 20/21 ALS 3T/8 Nodal efficiency in the right thalamus of ALS
Dysfunction of the right thalamus in ALS abnormal FC with the motor cortex
Zhou (2013) [75] 12/12 ALS 3T FC of the pairs of left thalamus/right primary motor cortex in ALS patients compared with HCs
Mahammadi (2009) [76] 27/22 10 ALS without bulbar signs, 12 ALS with bulbar signs, 5 Kennedy syndrome 3T Activation in the thalamus in bulbar ALS
T1-w and DTI Finegan (2021) [77] 40/100 PLS 3T/8 Thalamic volume in PLS patients compared with HCs
FA and AD, RD, and MD in thalamus in PLS patients compared with HCs
Thalamic volume and diffusivity measures disease severity in PLS patients
Christidi (2018) [78] 56/25 28 ALS-non-PLC, 28 ALS-PLC 3T/8 GMV in thalamus in ALS patients compared with HCs
FA in thalamus in ALS-PLC patients compared with ALS-non-PLC patients
RD in bilateral CST at right anterior thalamic radiation in ALS-PLC patients
Tu (2018) [79] 20/31 ALS 3T/12 ALS thalamic GMV and thalamic diffusion
Thalamic diffusion cortical dysfunction and disease severity
Thalamic connectivity changes mirror cortical involvement
Right frontal and left temporal thalamic subregions disease progression
Thalamic parcellation is a potential marker of ALS
Senda (2017) [80] 67/38 19 slow progressions ALS, 36 intermediates progression ALS, 12 rapid progressions ALS 3T/32 ALS thalamic GMV and FA in cortical and subcortical regions
ALS progression rate GM atrophy and FA severity and extent
Thalamic atrophy rapid > intermediate > slow progression
Bede (2013) [81] 39/44 30 ALS C9–, 9 ALS C9+ 3T/8 ALS C9+ thalamic volume and FA
ALS C9– thalamic shape changes in superior and inferior regions
ALS C9+ thalamic AD, MD, and RD compared with ALS C9–
Superior and inferolateral regions in right thalamus differences between C9– and C9+ patients
Thalamic FA ALS C9+ patients compared with HCs
Mahoney (2012) [82] 11/- 3 FTD-MND C9+, 8 FTD-MND C9– 1.5T and 3T C9+ thalamic GM bilaterally
C9+ RD and FA in anterior thalamic radiations bilaterally
Thalamic GM loss and thalamic radiation damage are related in C9+
Thivard (2007) [83] 15/25 ALS 1.5T FA thalamus ALSFRS-R
GMV in bilateral thalamus
T1-w and fMRI Devenney (2021) [84] 75/25 28 ALS, 9 ALS-plus, 11 ALS-FTD, 27 bvFTD 3T/8 GM in anterior thalamus in patients with sensory perceptual abnormalities
GM in anterior and medial thalamus in temporo-frontal network
GM in left anterior and medial thalamus in patients with psychosis
Cognitive, social, and neurobiological factors psychosis vulnerability in ALS-FTD
Thalamo-cortico-cerebellar network alterations psychosis vulnerability in ALS-FTD
T1-w and QSM Li (2022) [85] 34/34 ALS 3T/8 Iron deposition and QSM values in bilateral thalamus in ALS
GMV of the bilateral thalamus in ALS patients
GMV of bilateral thalamus in ALS
Iron deposition in thalamus ALSFRS-R score
T1-w, DTI, and fMRI Menke (2018) [86] 16/- 13 ALS, 3 PLS 3T/12 ALS thalamic GM and shape
AD anterior thalamic radiation
ALSFRS-R MD in the right anterior thalamic radiation
FA right thalamus
DTI changes in the GM MD, AD, and RD in the thalamus
FC between a network comprising both thalami and an area in the visual cortex ALSFRS-R
DTI and fMRI Li (2009) [87] 10/10 5 ALS with dysphagia, 5 ALS without dysphagia 3T/8 ALS without dysphagia FA in the thalamus bilaterally compared with HCs
ALS with dysphagia FA in the left thalamus compared with ALS without dysphagia
HCs and ALS without dysphagia fMRI signal in thalamus
ALS with dysphagia no fMRI signal in thalamus
Dysphagia in ALS left thalamic activation and FA
PD-w and fMRI Stoppel (2014) [88] 40/42 ALS fMRI; 3T/8 PD-w; 1.5T/(quadrature head coil) Target > non-Target contrasts Activity in motor system, such as the thalamus
● The thalamus is involved in motor system activity
● Motor-related functional alterations structural alterations in the thalamus
● ALS MTR and atrophy in the thalamus
ASL Wang (2022) [89] 18/20 ALS-FTD 3T/8 CBF to the thalamus in ALS-FTD patients compared with HCs
T2*-w De Reuck (2017) [90] 50/28 12 ALS, FTLD 7T Iron deposition in the thalamus and subthalamic nucleus of the FTLD patients
Fe in the subthalamic nuclei in ALS
T2-w Kato (1993) [91] 13/- ALS 0.5T High-intensity signals in the thalamus of one of the 13 patients

Abbreviations: ACE-III, third edition of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination; AD, axial diffusivity; ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; ALSFRS-R, Revised ALS Functional Rating Scale; ALS-FTD, ALS-frontotemporal dementia; ALSci, ALS with cognitive impairment; ALSbi, ALS with behavioral impairment; ALSni, ALS with normal cognitive and behavioral performance; ALSnci, ALS with no cognitive impairment; ALS-plus, strong criteria for cognitive and/or behavioral impairment; bvFTD, behavioral variant FTD; C9–, without C9ORF72C9orf72 mutation; C9+, with C9ORF72C9orf72 mutation; CBF, cerebral blood flow; cFL, calculated functional loss rate; cFS, calculated functional state; CO, cortical thickness; CST, corticospinal tract; DTI, diffusion tensor imaging; DGN, deep gray nuclei; ECAS, Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural ALS Screen; FA, fractional anisotropy; FC, functional connectivity; FTD-MND, frontotemporal lobe dementia with motor neuron disease; FTLD, frontotemporal lobar degeneration; FTLD-TDP, FTLD with transactivation response DNA-binding protein 43; fMRI, functional MRI; GM, gray matter; GMV, gray matter volume; IDM, intensity-driven modulator; M1, primary motor cortex; MD, mean diffusivity; MND, motor neuron disease; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MTR, magnetization transfer ratio; nfvPPA, nonfluent/agrammatic variant primary progressive aphasia; PD-w, proton density-weighted; PLC, pathological laughing and crying; PLS, primary lateral sclerosis; PMC, premotor cortex; PPA, primary progressive aphasia; RD, radial diffusivity; rD50, relative disease aggressiveness; ROI, region of interest; S1, primary somatosensory cortex; QSM, quantitative susceptibility mapping; svPPA, semantic variant primary progressive aphasia; T, Tesla; TA, tensor-based analysis; TMT, Trail Making Test; UMN, upper motor neuron; VBM, voxel-based morphometry; SD, semantic dementia; PNFA, progressive nonfluent aphasia; PPA-NOS, primary progressive aphasia not otherwise specified; ALS-CD, ALS with cognitive deficiency; CC, corpus callosum; T1-w, T1-weighted; HCs, healthy controls.
Symbols mean: : “increase” or “elevated”; : “decrease” or “reduced”; or : “leads to” or “results in”; : “fluctuation” or “variation”; : “bidirectional”, “correlation”, “contribution”, “associated with”, “two-way”, and “correlate to or with”.

MRI techniques include T1-weighted (T1-w), T2-weighted (T2-w), T2*-weighted (T2*-w), DTI, fMRI, arterial spin labeling (ASL), and quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM). These techniques measure different aspects of thalamic structure and function, such as volume, shape, density, diffusion, connectivity, CBF, iron deposition, and signal intensity. We also compared the findings across different subtypes of MND, including PLS, pathological laughing and crying ALS (PLC-ALS), dysphagia-ALS, ALS with strong criteria for cognitive and/or behavioral impairment (ALS-plus), C9orf72 mutation ALS, and ALS-FTD. In our review, there were studies with different ranges of magnetic field strength (0.5, 1.5, 3, 4, 4.7, and 7 Tesla), but 82% of the studies used a 3 Tesla device. Sixty-one percent of the studies reported the channel coil. A standard 8-channel coil was used in 72% of the studies. Despite the use of 32-channel coils in four studies, none of the studies utilized 64-channel coils. It may be worth considering the use of 64-channel coils in future studies due to their superior imaging characteristics.

3.2 Summary of Main Findings

Table 1 summarizes the findings of various studies that used MRI techniques for the thalamus (Fig. 2). Comparisons of the thalamus in patients with MNDs with HCs revealed significant alterations. These alterations included reduced gray matter volume (GMV), reduced fractional anisotropy (FA), increased mean diffusivity (MD), increased axial diffusivity (AD), increased radial diffusivity (RD), reduced cerebral blood flow (CBF), increased iron deposition, and reduced functional connectivity (FC). Some of these alterations are associated with disease severity, disease progression rate, functional disability, cognitive performance, and clinical symptoms. We observed differences and similarities between the studies in terms of the location, extent, and direction of the thalamic alterations, and some showed bilateral thalamic involvement [45, 46, 47, 56, 57, 60, 71, 77, 79, 82, 83, 85, 86, 87]. However, other studies showed unilateral or asymmetric involvement [48, 52, 59, 62, 63, 78, 80, 81, 87]. Some studies revealed more widespread and severe alterations in certain subtypes of MND, such as PLS [46, 49, 64], PLC-ALS [78], C9orf72 mutation ALS [59, 81, 82], dysphagia ALS [87], rapidly progressing ALS [80], and ALS-FTD [31, 53, 58]. Specific regions or subregions of the thalamus were more affected than others, such as the mediodorsal nucleus [67], anterior thalamic radiations [82], superior and inferior regions [81], sensorimotor and visual networks [86], and posterior thalamus [65].

Fig. 2.

Anatomical location of the thalamus and adjacent regions.

Forty percent of T1-w studies reported reduced GMV in the thalamus of patients with MND compared with HCs [21, 42, 53, 59, 60, 77, 78, 79, 80, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86]. Thalamic atrophy was more pronounced in ALS-FTD [21, 31, 43, 53, 54, 58, 65, 82], PLC-ALS [78], PLS [31, 45, 47, 55], C9orf72 mutation carriers [31, 45, 47, 55, 81, 82], and rapidly progressing ALS [80]. Thalamic atrophy was correlated with reduced survival, disease severity, duration, and progression rate, as well as impaired cognition and functional disability [31, 51, 62, 80, 88]. Specific thalamic subregions were more affected, including the mediodorsal nucleus [45, 47], anterior thalamic radiations [80, 82, 86], superior and inferior regions [81], and motor and sensory nuclei [47, 50].

Eighty-one percent of DTI studies reported an increase in MD, RD, and AD, as well as a decrease in FA in the thalamus of patients with MND compared with HCs [47, 50, 66, 68, 69, 71, 72, 77, 78, 80, 81, 83, 86]. DTI changes were more severe in ALS-FTD [47, 50], PLS [45, 47], and C9orf72 mutation carriers [47, 81]. DTI measures were correlated with reduced survival, increased severity, duration, and disease progression, as well as impaired cognition [67, 68, 69, 74, 78, 83, 88].

Seventy-five percent of fMRI studies reported reduced FC between the thalamus and cortical regions in patients with MND compared with HCs [74, 75, 76, 84, 86, 88]. FC was more reduced in ALS-FTD [84] and correlated with increased disease severity and progression [74, 87, 88].

4. Discussion

Our literature review shows that MRI techniques can detect various aspects of thalamic structure and function such as volume, shape, density, diffusion, connectivity, CBF, iron deposition, and signal intensity.

4.1 Structural Alterations

Atrophy of the thalamus was a common finding across several studies [21, 31, 42, 44, 46, 47, 49, 52, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 80, 88]. Thalamic atrophy might therefore have far-reaching implications. McKenna et al. [21] (2023) found variability in thalamic atrophy patterns, suggesting the differential involvement of various thalamic nuclei in MNDs. Variations were also observed based on the specific analytical methods used. This underscores the complexity of thalamic involvement in MNDs and the need for careful methodological considerations in future research. Several studies found reductions in GMV in the thalamus [42, 43, 44]. These changes may be associated with cognitive and motor functions, as suggested by the associations between thalamic GMV and cognitive function level and motor functional parameters [42, 51, 92]. Ahmed et al. [43] (2021) also reported that decreased thalamic volume can lead to poorer performance on the Trail Making Test (TMT), a neuropsychological test of visual attention and task switching [93, 94, 95]. Furthermore, advanced volumetric analyses have revealed thalamic atrophy in ALS [96]. This suggests a greater thalamic involvement at the severe end of the ALS-FTD spectrum. Among the FTD subtypes, thalamic atrophy is most pronounced in FTD with MND (FTD-MND) [31] .

C9orf72 mutation carriers show more extensive thalamic atrophy than C9orf72-negative carriers across diseases [59, 62]. The early radiological signs of C9orf72 mutation are linked to specific degeneration in the thalamus and focal hippocampus, which can be detected before any changes in the cortical gray matter (GM) occur [97]. This validates the early involvement of subcortical GM in C9orf72-related neurodegeneration [97]. Unexpectedly, hypermethylation of C9orf72 was associated with faster thalamic atrophy over time [59]. Vertex-based shape analyses localized the atrophy to superior, inferior, anterior, ventral, lateral, and medial thalamic subregions [49, 56]. Changes in diffusivity, magnetization transfer ratio (MTR), susceptibility, and homogeneity were also noted [48, 57], reflecting microstructural damage [98, 99] that aligns with other neurodegenerative diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS) [100, 101, 102]. Genotype-specific patterns of thalamic atrophy were also identified [45]. This suggests that genetic factors may influence the nature and extent of thalamic alterations in patients with MNDs. Furthermore, Devenney et al. [53] (2017) found that thalamic atrophy is associated with psychotic symptoms in patients with ALS-FTD carrying the C9orf72 mutation. Another interesting finding is that hypermethylation may protect the thalamus from this mutation [59], suggesting a possible avenue for therapeutic intervention [103].

Carriers of C9orf72 mutation show more thalamic atrophy than non-carriers, especially in the motor and sensory nuclei [21, 45, 47, 50, 52, 53, 55, 62]. Patients with PLS showed more thalamic atrophy than patients with ALS, especially in the pulvinar and lateral geniculate nuclei, which are involved in visual processing, reflecting the predominant upper motor neuron (UMN) involvement in PLS [45, 46, 47]. These findings are consistent with those of previous studies [50, 104]. Furthermore, changes in cognition, structure, and microstructure were identified in young individuals with the C9orf72 mutation. When focusing on individuals under the age of 40 years, those with the C9orf72 mutation showed right thalamic atrophy compared with those without the mutation [52].

ALS patients with cognitive impairment also show more thalamic atrophy than those without cognitive impairment [43, 51, 58]. Thalamic atrophy in MNDs was associated with various clinical outcomes, such as motor function, cognitive performance, behavioral symptoms, survival time, and disease progression [29, 105]. Thalamic volume or density correlated negatively with clinical severity scores, indicating that greater thalamic loss is associated with worse functional status [85, 106, 107, 108]. Thalamic volume or density also correlated positively with cognitive features, such as those measured using the third edition of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination (ACE-III) or TMT [43], suggesting that a smaller or less dense thalamus is related to poorer cognitive abilities. Thalamic volume or density also predicted survival time and disease progression rate in some studies, showing that lower thalamic values were associated with shorter survival or faster deterioration [62].

Thalamic atrophy in MNDs is not uniform across the whole thalamus, but affects specific nuclei or regions depending on the disease subtype and phenotype. For example, motor and sensory thalamic nuclei are commonly affected in ALS and PLS, reflecting impairment of the corticospinal and corticobulbar tracts [45, 47, 50]. Mediodorsal peritoneal-reuniens nuclei were frequently involved in ALS with or without FTD and C9orf72 mutation, suggesting a role in cognitive and behavioral functions [45, 47, 67]. Pulvinar and lateral geniculate nuclei are preferentially affected in PLS, which is possibly related to visual processing deficits [45, 47]. The anterior, ventral, and lateral thalamic nuclei are more atrophic in patients with ALS-FTD than in those without FTD, indicating a link between executive dysfunction and language impairment [47, 58]. According to the literature, despite the high occurrence of non-motor symptoms in rare MNDs such as post-polio syndrome (PPS), research has revealed that thalamic atrophy may not be a consistent characteristic of all rare forms of MND. This indicates that the underlying mechanisms and clinical manifestations of these disorders may be more intricate than previously assumed [109, 110].

The involvement of the thalamus in different subtypes of FTD was also reported [31, 61]. Thalamic atrophy was most pronounced in bvFTD, followed by ALS-FTD and ALS [61], again emphasizing the varied nature of thalamic involvement in different MNDs, suggesting that comorbidity with FTD exacerbates thalamic degeneration [21, 111]. Thalamic atrophy correlated with executive dysfunction and poorer cognitive performance, highlighting the role of thalamo-cortical circuits in cognition [43, 58, 67]. Associations with extrapyramidal motor deficits indicate the involvement of thalamo-basal ganglia connections [47]. Correlations with disease stage and progression suggest the potential use of the thalamus as a biomarker [44, 59]. These findings support previous research suggesting a connection between FTD and focal thalamic degeneration [21]. The specific thalamic traits associated with each phenotype align with well-established patterns of cortical vulnerability. Furthermore, it is likely that the primary symptoms of FTD phenotypes stem from dysfunction of the thalamocortical circuitry rather than solely from focal cortical changes. Given the compelling evidence of a significant burden of thalamic disease in the early stages of most FTD subtypes, it is important to consider the practical relevance, diagnostic role, prognostic significance, and monitoring potential of thalamic metrics in future FTD research [21, 29, 31].

In ALS, thalamic changes occur bilaterally [56, 57], whereas leftward asymmetry has been reported in ALS-FTD and PLS [49, 65]. Lateralized thalamic differences were also found between ALS cognitive subgroups [51]. These findings indicate that lateralization may reflect cognitive dysfunction. Finally, age-related changes in thalamic volume were observed in HCs but were more pronounced in patients with PLS [64]. This implies that normal aging may be accelerated or exacerbated in patients with MNDs, leading to greater thalamic atrophy.

Only one study used the ASL technique to assess CBF in the thalamus of MND patients [89]. This study reported a decrease in CBF in the thalamus of patients with ALS-FTD compared with HCs, suggesting reduced metabolic activity, perfusion in the thalamus, and hypoperfusion of the thalamus in patients with ALS-FTD [21, 112, 113]. Two studies used T2*-w [90] and T2-w [91] to detect iron deposition and signal intensity changes, respectively. T2*-w showed a significant increase in iron deposition in the thalamus of patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), but not in patients with ALS, suggesting a possible role of iron accumulation in neurodegeneration. T2-w reported high-intensity signals in the thalamus of one in 13 patients with ALS, suggesting a possible abnormality in water content or myelination.

4.2 DTI Alterations

Previous research has demonstrated that utilizing multimodal neuroimaging measures, particularly thalamic metrics, as input features in machine-learning models can aid in categorizing individual subjects into diagnostic groups. Studies have revealed that thalamic structural measures, in conjunction with white matter (WM) integrity metrics, play a crucial role in distinguishing between patients with ALS, HCs, and phenotypic variants such as PLS [114, 115, 116]. The consistent significance of thalamic characteristics in feature importance analyses across studies underscores the value of assessing thalamic integrity for diagnostic purposes. This suggests that quantifying thalamic involvement could facilitate the development of computational models capable of accurately distinguishing ALS from other conditions, such as PLS or HCs, at the individual level. This underscores the practical clinical significance of identifying thalamic signatures to support the early and precise diagnosis and prognosis of MNDs using machine learning [114, 115, 116]. Although large-scale validation is necessary, these findings confirm the potential of personalized diagnostic algorithms.

The thalamus, particularly the left mediodorsal nucleus, plays a crucial role in cognitive processes including memory and executive function. As a “higher order thalamic relay”, the left mediodorsal nucleus facilitates interactions across various association cortices through cortical-thalamocortical connections. This function makes it a key area of interest when studying memory and cognition-related impairments in MNDs such as ALS. The mediodorsal nucleus is associated with several DTI measurements and cognitive scores, suggesting that changes in this area may serve as a biomarker for cognitive impairment. Notably, a negative relationship was found between isolated memory subscores and MD and RD measurements in the left mediodorsal nucleus of the thalamus, underscoring its significance in memory functions [11, 67].

Additionally, the mediodorsal-paratenial-reuniens nuclei of the thalamus, which are involved in memory and executive functions, also exhibit changes in neurodegenerative diseases. A study by Chipika et al. [47] (2020) reported reduced volumes of these nuclei in patients with ALS without the C9orf72 gene mutation and in patients with PLS. This reduction points to potential disruption of “relay” circuits between different cortical regions, which could result in cognitive impairment. These findings highlight the importance of the thalamus and, more specifically, its various nuclei, in understanding the interplay between neurodegenerative processes and cognitive functions, including memory [117].

DTI studies reported an increase in MD and RD and a decrease in FA in the thalamus of MND patients compared with HCs or non-impaired MND patients [67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72]. Trojsi et al. [67] (2019) found that alterations in thalamic diffusion metrics, such as AD and MD, were associated with memory impairment and decreased visuospatial abilities in ALS patients. Specifically, they noted increased AD and MD in the mediodorsal nucleus of the left thalamus, with poorer performance on cognitive tests. This is consistent with the known role of the mediodorsal thalamus in memory and its connections to the prefrontal cortex [1, 67, 99, 118, 119]. Zhang et al. [68] (2017) also implicated thalamocortical pathways linking the thalamus to motor areas, such as the primary motor cortex, in the pathogenesis of ALS. Additional evidence for thalamic changes in ALS comes from Barbagallo et al. [69] (2014), who found that increased MD in the thalamus of patients versus HCs correlated with longer disease duration but lower Revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) scores. Sharma et al. [71] (2013) reported similar diffusion alterations, with higher MD, AD, and RD and lower FA in the thalamus of patients with ALS. Sach et al. [72] (2004) also found reduced FA in the right thalamus in ALS. Together, these diffusion MRI studies consistently demonstrate that the thalamus undergoes microstructural changes such as axonal loss and demyelination throughout the course of ALS. Sex may also play a role, as Bede et al. [70] (2014) linked higher thalamic FA to male sex in ALS.

These changes indicate reduced structural integrity and increased water diffusion in the thalamus owing to neurodegeneration, axonal damage, or demyelination. As previously mentioned, consistent with the T1-w section, the scope and configuration of these modifications differed based on the type of MND, occurrence or non-occurrence of FTD or cognitive decline, and the genetic condition.

4.3 fMRI Alterations

Recent resting-state and task-based fMRI studies have provided evidence for thalamus dysfunction in ALS and other MNDs. fMRI studies have reported altered FC between the thalamus and other brain regions in patients with MND compared with HCs or non-impaired patients with MND [74, 75, 76]. Dey et al. [73] (2023) found that increased FC between the premotor cortex and regions including the left thalamus was associated with greater disease progression in patients with ALS. This aligns with the role of the thalamus, particularly the ventral lateral nucleus, in motor control circuits connected to the motor cortex, suggesting that the thalamus plays a role in ALS pathophysiology [118, 120]. Xu et al. [74] (2017) specifically reported reduced nodal efficiency in the right thalamus of ALS patients, suggesting that its functional connections to the motor cortex are disrupted. Further support comes from Zhou et al. [75] (2013), who found decreased FC between the left thalamus and the right primary motor cortex in patients with ALS compared with HCs. These FC disturbances point to a failure of communication between the thalamus and the motor cortex in ALS. The thalamus relays sensory and motor signals to the cortex; therefore, impaired connectivity could contribute to motor neuron degeneration [74]. In addition to changes in the resting state, Mohammadi et al. [76] (2009) reported reduced task-based activation in the thalamus of patients with bulbar-onset ALS, indicating motor network dysfunction. Thalamic hypoactivation could be related to deficits in the coordination of volitional movements that characterize ALS. Ultimately, these changes indicate disrupted communication and coordination of neural activity in the thalamus and its target areas. The direction and pattern of these changes varied depending on the MND subtype, presence or absence of FTD or cognitive impairment, and task or resting-state conditions.

4.4 Multi-Technique Alterations

Multi-technique MRI studies have consistently demonstrated alterations in thalamic biomarkers. The key findings of the reviewed studies suggest that patients with MND exhibit reduced GMV in the thalamus compared with HCs [77, 78, 79, 83, 85]. More extensive thalamic atrophy appears to be related to the faster progression of ALS and greater functional impairment according to the ALSFRS-R score [80]. Furthermore, decreased FA and increased apparent AD, RD, and MD have been reported in the thalamus of MND patients compared with HCs [77, 86]. These findings reflect microstructural changes in the thalamus, which may be related to degeneration of WM tracts and neuronal loss.

fMRI studies have also shown differences in thalamic activation in ALS patients during motor tasks, as well as changes in FC [87, 88]. For example, reduced thalamic activation during swallowing tasks has been associated with dysphagia symptoms [87]. Together, these structural and functional changes demonstrate thalamic network dysfunction in ALS, disrupting communication with the motor cortical regions.

Li’s study in 2022 highlighted an increase in iron deposition and QSM values in the bilateral thalamus in people with ALS. Additionally, he found a decrease in GMV in the bilateral thalamus of patients with ALS, suggesting atrophy in these areas. Notably, an increase in iron deposition in the thalamus is associated with a decrease in the ALSFRS-R score, which measures ALS disease severity [85]. This is consistent with postmortem evidence of increased iron levels in the motor networks of ALS patients, which may be related to neuroinflammation and oxidative stress, contributing to disease progression [121]. Finegan et al. [77] (2021) reported a decrease in thalamic volume and diffusivity measures such as FA, AD, RD, and MD in patients with PLS compared with HC, identifying a possible marker of disease severity. Changes in these parameters were associated with an increase in PLS severity, indicating that MRI parameters could potentially be used as markers of disease progression.

Devenney et al. [84] (2021) identified a decrease in GM in the anterior and medial thalamus in patients with sensory perceptual abnormalities and patients with psychosis. They further suggested that cognitive, social, and neurobiological factors could contribute to psychosis vulnerability in patients with ALS-FTD, with thalamo-cortico-cerebellar network alterations playing a significant role. Christidi et al. [78] (2018) and Tu et al. [79] (2018) both reported a decrease in GMV in the thalamus in patients with ALS. Tu et al. [79] further suggested that thalamic diffusion correlates with cortical dysfunction and disease severity, making thalamic parcellation a potential marker of ALS.

Christidi et al. [78] (2018) reported that PLC anomalies in ALS are caused by both GM and WM abnormalities, emphasizing the importance of circuits rather than isolated sites in the genesis of this illness. PLC was studied using ALS as a natural experimental model.

Menke et al. [86] (2018) found that ALS is associated with decreased thalamic GM and shape and that changes in DTI parameters in the GM, such as increased MD, AD, and RD in the thalamus, may be indicative of ALS. Furthermore, they suggested that decreased FC between a network comprising both the thalami and an area in the visual cortex is associated with a decrease in the ALSFRS-R score. These FC changes may reflect the disruption of large-scale brain networks due to the degeneration of WM tracts connecting the thalamus and other areas such as the motor and frontotemporal cortices. These findings are consistent with those of Thivard et al. [83] (2007), who found that decreased FA in the thalamus correlates with the ALSFRS-R score and also reported decreased GMV in the bilateral thalamus in ALS patients. These results emphasize that the thalamus, WM tracts, and FC play a role in the pathophysiology of ALS. They provide knowledge on the alterations in structure and function linked to the condition and enhance our understanding of its fundamental mechanisms.

Senda et al. [80] (2017) reported similar findings, associating ALS with decreased GMV in the thalamus and FA in the cortical and subcortical regions. They suggested that the rate of ALS progression is correlated with GM atrophy and the severity and extent of decreased FA. Furthermore, they found that thalamic atrophy varies with the rate of progression and is faster in rapid progression than in slow progression.

Stoppel et al. [88] (2014) and Bede et al. [81] (2013) reported motor system involvement in the thalamus, with ALS associated with decreased MTR and thalamic atrophy. Bede also found that ALS patients with the C9orf72 gene mutation showed decreased thalamic volume and FA, but increased thalamic AD, MD, and RD compared with ALS patients without the C9orf72 mutation.

Mahoney et al. [82] (2012) and Li et al. [87] (2009) found decreased thalamic GM bilaterally in ALS patients with the C9orf72 gene mutation. Furthermore, Li found a bilateral decrease in FA in patients with ALS without dysphagia compared with HCs, and a further decrease in FA in the left thalamus in patients with ALS with dysphagia.

Interestingly, thalamic alterations may differ depending on genotype, as carriers of the C9orf72 mutation show unique volume loss and diffusion changes compared with patients without the C9orf72 mutation [81, 82]. Regional thalamic subnetworks also appear to follow distinct trajectories during the disease stages [79]. This suggests the potential of thalamic MRI metrics as imaging biomarkers for ALS genetics and progression.

These findings imply that multimodal MRI techniques can be more useful for detecting and monitoring thalamic alterations in MNDs as well as for identifying subgroups of patients with different clinical phenotypes and prognoses. Thalamic alterations in MNDs may result from various mechanisms such as axonal damage, neuronal demise, neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, excitotoxicity, or network dysfunction. Thalamic changes in MNDs can have several consequences, such as impaired motor, sensory, cognitive, emotional, and sleep functions. Thalamic alterations in MNDs may have diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications. For example, thalamic changes may help to distinguish MND subtypes or progression patterns, monitor disease progression, predict functional decline or survival time, and serve as potential therapeutic targets or biomarkers for treatment response in patients with MND.

5. Points to Consider

Advanced MRI methods allow for sensitive detection and measurement of dynamic thalamic alterations in MNDs from clinical to final stages. Understanding the complex sequence of structural, functional, and metabolic thalamic modifications in disease etiology may lead to the identification of new therapeutic targets. Longitudinal multimodal and multiparametric imaging investigations with larger cohorts will provide more information on the link between thalamic biomarkers and clinical milestones. Validated thalamic imaging measures have the potential to improve differential diagnosis, track progression, predict outcomes, and evaluate therapies for patients in the future. To date, these findings encourage further research into the targeted manipulation of thalamic activity and connectivity as a treatment option for MNDs. The use of thalamic neuroplasticity helps restore motor and cognitive function. In conclusion, discovering the mysteries of the thalamus will usher in a new era of more accurate medication and improved quality of life for patients with MNDs.

Finally, Table 2 highlights the importance of the thalamus in MNDs. Thalamic damage occurs early, progresses over the course of the disease, and involves multiple pathological pathways. Multimodal MRI techniques have the potential to reveal distinct thalamic signatures that correlate with different disease subtypes and outcomes. Further research is needed to validate thalamic biomarkers and elucidate the mechanisms of thalamic degeneration in MNDs. However, the thalamus is a promising target for future prognostic tools and therapeutic interventions in these currently incurable conditions. Targeting thalamic dysfunction and network disruptions may present novel avenues for managing motor, cognitive, and behavioral symptoms, and altering disease progression in MNDs.

Table 2.Summary of thalamic MRI findings across motor neuron diseases.
Multiple MRI techniques have detected:
T1-w and voxel-based morphometry analyses Reduced thalamic gray matter volume indicating atrophy
DTI biomarkers Increased thalamic diffusion measures, such as MD, RD, and AD, reflecting axonal damage
Decreased FA suggesting decreased structural integrity
fMRI biomarkers Reduced functional connectivity between the thalamus and the motor cortex reflecting network disruptions
Changes in other biomarkers Lower thalamic CBF indicating reduced perfusion
More iron deposition in the thalamus indicates possible neuroinflammation
Thalamic changes correlate with the severity, progression rate, and functional impairment of the disease.
Thalamic changes are more severe in certain subtypes of MND (e.g., PLS, C9orf72 ALS, ALS-FTD) and are associated with clinical outcomes such as disability and cognition.
Specific thalamic subregions and nuclei are affected depending on MND phenotype.
Multimodal MRI is most useful for detecting dynamic thalamic changes from preclinical to advanced stages of the disease.
Understanding thalamic pathology can enable improved diagnosis, tracking, prediction, and treatment of MNDs.
The thalamus is a potential therapeutic target.

Abbreviations: AD, axial diffusivity; ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; ALS-FTD, ALS with frontotemporal dementia; CBF, cerebral blood flow; DTI, diffusion tensor imaging; FA, fractional anisotropy; fMRI, functional magnetic resonance imaging; MD, mean diffusivity; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MND, motor neuron disease; PLS, primary lateral sclerosis; RD, radial diffusivity; T1-w, T1-weighted.

6. Conclusions

Magnetic resonance neuroimaging studies provide robust evidence for significant thalamic involvement in the spectrum of MNDs. Structural, functional, and multimodal neuroimaging techniques have consistently demonstrated thalamic pathology in ALS, FTD, PLS, and genetic variants. Key findings showed that thalamic atrophy, microstructural degradation, disruption of network connectivity, perfusion deficits, and neurochemical alterations are interrelated biomarkers of disease progression in MNDs. Thalamic changes correlate with the clinical measures of motor impairment, cognitive decline, and reduced survival. Alterations are most extensive with rapid progression, executive dysfunction, and C9orf72 mutations. Differential targeting of the motor, sensory, associative, and limbic nuclei contributes to the heterogeneous phenotypes.

Availability of Data and Materials

This article contains all of the data produced or analyzed during this investigation. Any further inquiries should be forwarded to the corresponding author.

Author Contributions

SG and SM: Conceptualization, methodology, investigation, writing - original draft, visualization, writing - review & editing. SG, SM, MM, ZNAP, RK, FM, and SMJ: Formal analysis, resources, data curation, and writing the original draft. SG: Supervision, project administration. All authors contributed to editorial changes in the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. All authors have participated sufficiently in the work and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Acknowledgment

Not applicable.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References
[1]
Chipika RH, Mulkerrin G, Pradat PF, Murad A, Ango F, Raoul C, et al. Cerebellar pathology in motor neuron disease: neuroplasticity and neurodegeneration. Neural Regeneration Research. 2022; 17: 2335–2341.
[2]
Sen T, Thummer RP. CRISPR and iPSCs: Recent Developments and Future Perspectives in Neurodegenerative Disease Modelling, Research, and Therapeutics. Neurotoxicity Research. 2022; 40: 1597–1623.
[3]
Park J, Kim JE, Song TJ. The Global Burden of Motor Neuron Disease: An Analysis of the 2019 Global Burden of Disease Study. Frontiers in Neurology. 2022; 13: 864339.
[4]
Arora RD, Khan YS. Motor Neuron Disease. In: StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA. 2023.
[5]
Ghaderi S, Batouli SAH, Mohammadi S, Fatehi F. Iron quantification in basal ganglia using quantitative susceptibility mapping in a patient with ALS: a case report and literature review. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2023; 17: 1229082.
[6]
Grad LI, Rouleau GA, Ravits J, Cashman NR. Clinical Spectrum of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine. 2017; 7: a024117.
[7]
Masrori P, Van Damme P. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a clinical review. European Journal of Neurology. 2020; 27: 1918–1929.
[8]
Mohammadi S, Ghaderi S. Motor Band Sign in Motor Neuron Diseases Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. 2023; 2023: 1–14.
[9]
Chowdhury A, Mukherjee A, Sinharoy U, Pandit A, Biswas A. Non-Motor Features of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Clinic-based Study. Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology. 2021; 24: 745–753.
[10]
Bak TH. Motor neuron disease and frontotemporal dementia: One, two, or three diseases? Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology. 2010; 13: S81–S88.
[11]
Ghaderi S, Fatehi F, Kalra S, Batouli SAH. MRI biomarkers for memory-related impairment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis & Frontotemporal Degeneration. 2023; 1–17.
[12]
Ragagnin AMG, Shadfar S, Vidal M, Jamali MS, Atkin JD. Motor Neuron Susceptibility in ALS/FTD. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2019; 13: 532.
[13]
Fama R, Sullivan EV. Thalamic structures and associated cognitive functions: Relations with age and aging. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 2015; 54: 29–37.
[14]
Saalmann YB, Kastner S. The cognitive thalamus. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience. 2015; 9: 39.
[15]
Wolff M, Vann SD. The Cognitive Thalamus as a Gateway to Mental Representations. The Journal of Neuroscience: the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2019; 39: 3–14.
[16]
Antón-Bolaños N, Espinosa A, López-Bendito G. Developmental interactions between thalamus and cortex: a true love reciprocal story. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 2018; 52: 33–41.
[17]
Halassa MM, Sherman SM. Thalamocortical Circuit Motifs: A General Framework. Neuron. 2019; 103: 762–770.
[18]
McKenna MC, Corcia P, Couratier P, Siah WF, Pradat PF, Bede P. Frontotemporal Pathology in Motor Neuron Disease Phenotypes: Insights From Neuroimaging. Frontiers in Neurology. 2021; 12: 723450.
[19]
Rubio MA, Herrando-Grabulosa M, Navarro X. Sensory Involvement in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23: 15521.
[20]
Peet BT, Spina S, Mundada N, La Joie R. Neuroimaging in Frontotemporal Dementia: Heterogeneity and Relationships with Underlying Neuropathology. Neurotherapeutics: the Journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics. 2021; 18: 728–752.
[21]
McKenna MC, Lope J, Bede P, Tan EL. Thalamic pathology in frontotemporal dementia: Predilection for specific nuclei, phenotype-specific signatures, clinical correlates, and practical relevance. Brain and Behavior. 2023; 13: e2881.
[22]
Finger EC. Frontotemporal Dementias. Continuum (Minneapolis, Minn.). 2016; 22: 464–489.
[23]
Goedert M, Ghetti B, Spillantini MG. Frontotemporal dementia: implications for understanding Alzheimer disease. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine. 2012; 2: a006254.
[24]
Ljubenkov PA, Miller BL. A Clinical Guide to Frontotemporal Dementias. Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing). 2016; 14: 448–464.
[25]
Bott NT, Radke A, Stephens ML, Kramer JH. Frontotemporal dementia: diagnosis, deficits and management. Neurodegenerative Disease Management. 2014; 4: 439–454.
[26]
Ding W, Ren P, Yi L, Si Y, Yang F, Li Z, et al. Association of cortical and subcortical microstructure with disease severity: impact on cognitive decline and language impairments in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Alzheimer’s Research & Therapy. 2023; 15: 58.
[27]
Johnen A, Bertoux M. Psychological and Cognitive Markers of Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia-A Clinical Neuropsychologist’s View on Diagnostic Criteria and Beyond. Frontiers in Neurology. 2019; 10: 594.
[28]
Gifford A, Praschan N, Newhouse A, Chemali Z. Biomarkers in frontotemporal dementia: Current landscape and future directions. Biomark. Neuropsychiatry. Biomarkers in Neuropsychiatry. 2023; 8: 100065.
[29]
Bocchetta M, Iglesias JE, Neason M, Cash DM, Warren JD, Rohrer JD. Thalamic nuclei in frontotemporal dementia: Mediodorsal nucleus involvement is universal but pulvinar atrophy is unique to C9orf72. Human Brain Mapping. 2020; 41: 1006–1016.
[30]
Scarioni M, Gami-Patel P, Timar Y, Seelaar H, van Swieten JC, Rozemuller AJM, et al. Frontotemporal Dementia: Correlations Between Psychiatric Symptoms and Pathology. Annals of Neurology. 2020; 87: 950–961.
[31]
Bocchetta M, Gordon E, Cardoso MJ, Modat M, Ourselin S, Warren JD, et al. Thalamic atrophy in frontotemporal dementia - Not just a C9orf72 problem. NeuroImage. Clinical. 2018; 18: 675–681.
[32]
Bocchetta M. Frontotemporal Dementia. In Mitchell AS, Usrey WM, Sherman SM (eds.) The Cerebral Cortex and Thalamus. Oxford University Press: Oxford. 2023.
[33]
Zejlon C, Nakhostin D, Winklhofer S, Pangalu A, Kulcsar Z, Lewandowski S, et al. Structural magnetic resonance imaging findings and histopathological correlations in motor neuron diseases-A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Neurology. 2022; 13: 947347.
[34]
Filippi M, Agosta F. Diffusion tensor imaging and functional MRI. Handbook of Clinical Neurology. 2016; 136: 1065–1087.
[35]
Kamagata K, Andica C, Kato A, Saito Y, Uchida W, Hatano T, et al. Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Biomarkers for Neurodegenerative Diseases. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22: 5216.
[36]
Baek SH, Park J, Kim YH, Seok HY, Oh KW, Kim HJ, et al. Usefulness of diffusion tensor imaging findings as biomarkers for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Scientific Reports. 2020; 10: 5199.
[37]
Barritt AW, Gabel MC, Cercignani M, Leigh PN. Emerging Magnetic Resonance Imaging Techniques and Analysis Methods in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Frontiers in Neurology. 2018; 9: 1065.
[38]
Bharti K, J Graham S, Benatar M, Briemberg H, Chenji S, Dupré N, et al. Functional alterations in large-scale resting-state networks of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A multi-site study across Canada and the United States. PloS One. 2022; 17: e0269154.
[39]
Anand T, Ishaque A, Ta D, Khan MU, Bharti K, Wu A, et al. Characterization of white matter alterations using diffusion kurtosis imaging in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain and Behavior. 2023; 13: e3102.
[40]
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.). 2021; 372: n71.
[41]
Whiting PF, Rutjes AWS, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2011; 155: 529–536.
[42]
Dieckmann N, Roediger A, Prell T, Schuster S, Herdick M, Mayer TE, et al. Cortical and subcortical grey matter atrophy in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis correlates with measures of disease accumulation independent of disease aggressiveness. NeuroImage. Clinical. 2022; 36: 103162.
[43]
Ahmed RM, Bocchetta M, Todd EG, Tse NY, Devenney EM, Tu S, et al. Tackling clinical heterogeneity across the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-frontotemporal dementia spectrum using a transdiagnostic approach. Brain Communications. 2021; 3: fcab257.
[44]
Liu S, Ren Q, Gong G, Sun Y, Zhao B, Ma X, et al. Hippocampal subfield and anterior-posterior segment volumes in patients with sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. NeuroImage. Clinical. 2021; 32: 102816.
[45]
Chipika RH, Siah WF, Shing SLH, Finegan E, McKenna MC, Christidi F, et al. MRI data confirm the selective involvement of thalamic and amygdalar nuclei in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and primary lateral sclerosis. Data in Brief. 2020; 32: 106246.
[46]
Finegan E, Hi Shing SL, Chipika RH, McKenna MC, Doherty MA, Hengeveld JC, et al. Thalamic, hippocampal and basal ganglia pathology in primary lateral sclerosis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Evidence from quantitative imaging data. Data in Brief. 2020; 29: 105115.
[47]
Chipika RH, Finegan E, Li Hi Shing S, McKenna MC, Christidi F, Chang KM, et al. “Switchboard” malfunction in motor neuron diseases: Selective pathology of thalamic nuclei in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and primary lateral sclerosis. NeuroImage. Clinical. 2020; 27: 102300.
[48]
Johns SLM, Ishaque A, Khan M, Yang YH, Wilman AH, Kalra S. Quantifying changes on susceptibility weighted images in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis using MRI texture analysis. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis & Frontotemporal Degeneration. 2019; 20: 396–403.
[49]
Finegan E, Li Hi Shing S, Chipika RH, Doherty MA, Hengeveld JC, Vajda A, et al. Widespread subcortical grey matter degeneration in primary lateral sclerosis: a multimodal imaging study with genetic profiling. NeuroImage. Clinical. 2019; 24: 102089.
[50]
Bede P, Omer T, Finegan E, Chipika RH, Iyer PM, Doherty MA, et al. Connectivity-based characterisation of subcortical grey matter pathology in frontotemporal dementia and ALS: a multimodal neuroimaging study. Brain Imaging and Behavior. 2018; 12: 1696–1707.
[51]
Branco LMT, de Rezende TJR, Roversi CDO, Zanao T, Casseb RF, de Campos BM, et al. Brain signature of mild stages of cognitive and behavioral impairment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Psychiatry Research. Neuroimaging. 2018; 272: 58–64.
[52]
Bertrand A, Wen J, Rinaldi D, Houot M, Sayah S, Camuzat A, et al. Early Cognitive, Structural, and Microstructural Changes in Presymptomatic C9orf72 Carriers Younger Than 40 Years. JAMA Neurology. 2018; 75: 236–245.
[53]
Devenney EM, Landin-Romero R, Irish M, Hornberger M, Mioshi E, Halliday GM, et al. The neural correlates and clinical characteristics of psychosis in the frontotemporal dementia continuum and the C9orf72 expansion. NeuroImage. Clinical. 2017; 13: 439–445.
[54]
Masuda M, Senda J, Watanabe H, Epifanio B, Tanaka Y, Imai K, et al. Involvement of the caudate nucleus head and its networks in sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-frontotemporal dementia continuum. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis & Frontotemporal Degeneration. 2016; 17: 571–579.
[55]
Westeneng HJ, Walhout R, Straathof M, Schmidt R, Hendrikse J, Veldink JH, et al. Widespread structural brain involvement in ALS is not limited to the C9orf72 repeat expansion. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. 2016; 87: 1354–1360.
[56]
Bede P, Iyer PM, Schuster C, Elamin M, Mclaughlin RL, Kenna K, et al. The selective anatomical vulnerability of ALS: ‘disease-defining’ and ‘disease-defying’ brain regions. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis & Frontotemporal Degeneration. 2016; 17: 561–570.
[57]
de Albuquerque M, Anjos LGV, Maia Tavares de Andrade H, de Oliveira MS, Castellano G, Junqueira Ribeiro de Rezende T, et al. MRI Texture Analysis Reveals Deep Gray Nuclei Damage in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Journal of Neuroimaging: Official Journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging. 2016; 26: 201–206.
[58]
Machts J, Loewe K, Kaufmann J, Jakubiczka S, Abdulla S, Petri S, et al. Basal ganglia pathology in ALS is associated with neuropsychological deficits. Neurology. 2015; 85: 1301–1309.
[59]
McMillan CT, Russ J, Wood EM, Irwin DJ, Grossman M, McCluskey L, et al. C9orf72 promoter hypermethylation is neuroprotective: Neuroimaging and neuropathologic evidence. Neurology. 2015; 84: 1622–1630.
[60]
Menke RAL, Körner S, Filippini N, Douaud G, Knight S, Talbot K, et al. Widespread grey matter pathology dominates the longitudinal cerebral MRI and clinical landscape of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain: a Journal of Neurology. 2014; 137: 2546–2555.
[61]
Lillo P, Mioshi E, Burrell JR, Kiernan MC, Hodges JR, Hornberger M. Grey and white matter changes across the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-frontotemporal dementia continuum. PloS One. 2012; 7: e43993.
[62]
Sha SJ, Takada LT, Rankin KP, Yokoyama JS, Rutherford NJ, Fong JC, et al. Frontotemporal dementia due to C9ORF72 mutations: clinical and imaging features. Neurology. 2012; 79: 1002–1011.
[63]
Rohrer JD, Geser F, Zhou J, Gennatas ED, Sidhu M, Trojanowski JQ, et al. TDP-43 subtypes are associated with distinct atrophy patterns in frontotemporal dementia. Neurology. 2010; 75: 2204–2211.
[64]
Tartaglia MC, Laluz V, Rowe A, Findlater K, Lee DH, Kennedy K, et al. Brain atrophy in primary lateral sclerosis. Neurology. 2009; 72: 1236–1241.
[65]
Chang JL, Lomen-Hoerth C, Murphy J, Henry RG, Kramer JH, Miller BL, et al. A voxel-based morphometry study of patterns of brain atrophy in ALS and ALS/FTLD. Neurology. 2005; 65: 75–80.
[66]
El Mendili MM, Grapperon AM, Dintrich R, Stellmann JP, Ranjeva JP, Guye M, et al. Alterations of Microstructure and Sodium Homeostasis in Fast Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Progressors: A Brain DTI and Sodium MRI Study. AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2022; 43: 984–990.
[67]
Trojsi F, Caiazzo G, Siciliano M, Femiano C, Passaniti C, Russo A, et al. Microstructural correlates of Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural ALS Screen (ECAS) changes in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Psychiatry Research. Neuroimaging. 2019; 288: 67–75.
[68]
Zhang JQ, Ji B, Zhou CY, Li LC, Li ZH, Hu XP, et al. Differential Impairment of Thalamocortical Structural Connectivity in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics. 2017; 23: 155–161.
[69]
Barbagallo G, Nicoletti G, Cherubini A, Trotta M, Tallarico T, Chiriaco C, et al. Diffusion tensor MRI changes in gray structures of the frontal-subcortical circuits in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurological Sciences: Official Journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2014; 35: 911–918.
[70]
Bede P, Elamin M, Byrne S, Hardiman O. Sexual dimorphism in ALS: exploring gender-specific neuroimaging signatures. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis & Frontotemporal Degeneration. 2014; 15: 235–243.
[71]
Sharma KR, Sheriff S, Maudsley A, Govind V. Diffusion tensor imaging of basal ganglia and thalamus in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Journal of Neuroimaging: Official Journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging. 2013; 23: 368–374.
[72]
Sach M, Winkler G, Glauche V, Liepert J, Heimbach B, Koch MA, et al. Diffusion tensor MRI of early upper motor neuron involvement in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain: a Journal of Neurology. 2004; 127: 340–350.
[73]
Dey A, Luk CC, Ishaque A, Ta D, Srivastava O, Krebs D, et al. Motor cortex functional connectivity is associated with underlying neurochemistry in ALS. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. 2023; 94: 193–200.
[74]
Xu J, Li H, Li C, Yao JC, Hu J, Wang J, et al. Abnormal cortical-basal ganglia network in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A voxel-wise network efficiency analysis. Behavioural Brain Research. 2017; 333: 123–128.
[75]
Zhou F, Gong H, Li F, Zhuang Y, Zang Y, Xu R, et al. Altered motor network functional connectivity in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroreport. 2013; 24: 657–662.
[76]
Mohammadi B, Kollewe K, Samii A, Krampfl K, Dengler R, Münte TF. Decreased brain activation to tongue movements in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with bulbar involvement but not Kennedy syndrome. Journal of Neurology. 2009; 256: 1263–1269.
[77]
Finegan E, Shing SLH, Chipika RH, Chang KM, McKenna MC, Doherty MA, et al. Extra-motor cerebral changes and manifestations in primary lateral sclerosis. Brain Imaging and Behavior. 2021; 15: 2283–2296.
[78]
Christidi F, Karavasilis E, Ferentinos P, Xirou S, Velonakis G, Rentzos M, et al. Investigating the neuroanatomical substrate of pathological laughing and crying in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with multimodal neuroimaging techniques. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis & Frontotemporal Degeneration. 2018; 19: 12–20.
[79]
Tu S, Menke RAL, Talbot K, Kiernan MC, Turner MR. Regional thalamic MRI as a marker of widespread cortical pathology and progressive frontotemporal involvement in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. 2018; 89: 1250–1258.
[80]
Senda J, Atsuta N, Watanabe H, Bagarinao E, Imai K, Yokoi D, et al. Structural MRI correlates of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis progression. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. 2017; 88: 901–907.
[81]
Bede P, Elamin M, Byrne S, McLaughlin RL, Kenna K, Vajda A, et al. Basal ganglia involvement in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology. 2013; 81: 2107–2115.
[82]
Mahoney CJ, Beck J, Rohrer JD, Lashley T, Mok K, Shakespeare T, et al. Frontotemporal dementia with the C9ORF72 hexanucleotide repeat expansion: clinical, neuroanatomical and neuropathological features. Brain: a Journal of Neurology. 2012; 135: 736–750.
[83]
Thivard L, Pradat PF, Lehéricy S, Lacomblez L, Dormont D, Chiras J, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging and voxel based morphometry study in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: relationships with motor disability. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. 2007; 78: 889–892.
[84]
Devenney EM, Tu S, Caga J, Ahmed RM, Ramsey E, Zoing M, et al. Neural mechanisms of psychosis vulnerability and perceptual abnormalities in the ALS-FTD spectrum. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology. 2021; 8: 1576–1591.
[85]
Li Q, Zhu W, Wen X, Zang Z, Da Y, Lu J. Beyond the Motor Cortex: Thalamic Iron Deposition Accounts for Disease Severity in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Frontiers in Neurology. 2022; 13: 791300.
[86]
Menke RAL, Proudfoot M, Talbot K, Turner MR. The two-year progression of structural and functional cerebral MRI in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. NeuroImage. Clinical. 2018; 17: 953–961.
[87]
Li S, Chen Q, Yu B, Xue K, Luo C, Xu Y, et al. Structural and functional changes mapped in the brains of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients with/without dysphagia: a pilot study. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Official Publication of the World Federation of Neurology Research Group on Motor Neuron Diseases. 2009; 10: 280–287.
[88]
Stoppel CM, Vielhaber S, Eckart C, Machts J, Kaufmann J, Heinze HJ, et al. Structural and functional hallmarks of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis progression in motor- and memory-related brain regions. NeuroImage. Clinical. 2014; 5: 277–290.
[89]
Wang Y, Shen D, Hou B, Sun X, Yang X, Gao J, et al. Brain structural and perfusion changes in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-frontotemporal dementia patients with cognitive and motor onset: a preliminary study. Brain Imaging and Behavior. 2022; 16: 2164–2174.
[90]
De Reuck J, Devos D, Moreau C, Auger F, Durieux N, Deramecourt V, et al. Topographic distribution of brain iron deposition and small cerebrovascular lesions in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and in frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a post-mortem 7.0-tesla magnetic resonance imaging study with neuropathological correlates. Acta Neurologica Belgica. 2017; 117: 873–878.
[91]
Kato S, Hayashi H, Yagishita A. Involvement of the frontotemporal lobe and limbic system in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: as assessed by serial computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 1993; 116: 52–58.
[92]
Pettit LD, Bastin ME, Smith C, Bak TH, Gillingwater TH, Abrahams S. Executive deficits, not processing speed relates to abnormalities in distinct prefrontal tracts in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain. 2013; 136: 3290–3304.
[93]
Recker L, Foerster RM, Schneider WX, Poth CH. Emphasizing speed or accuracy in an eye-tracking version of the Trail-Making-Test: Towards experimental diagnostics for decomposing executive functions. PloS One. 2022; 17: e0274579.
[94]
Du M, Andersen SL, Cosentino S, Boudreau RM, Perls TT, Sebastiani P. Digitally generated Trail Making Test data: Analysis using hidden Markov modeling. Alzheimer’s & Dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands). 2022; 14: e12292.
[95]
Suarez PA, Díaz-Santos M, Marquine MJ, Kamalyan L, Mindt MR, Umlauf A, et al. Demographically adjusted norms for the Trail Making Test in native Spanish speakers: Results from the neuropsychological norms for the US-Mexico border region in Spanish (NP-NUMBRS) project. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 2021; 35: 308–323.
[96]
Castelnovo V, Canu E, De Mattei F, Filippi M, Agosta F. Basal ganglia alterations in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2023; 17: 1133758.
[97]
Bede P, Lulé D, Müller HP, Tan EL, Dorst J, Ludolph AC, et al. Presymptomatic grey matter alterations in ALS kindreds: a computational neuroimaging study of asymptomatic C9orf72 and SOD1 mutation carriers. Journal of Neurology. 2023; 270: 4235–4247.
[98]
Chen HJ, Zhan C, Cai LM, Lin JH, Zhou MX, Zou ZY, et al. White matter microstructural impairments in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A mean apparent propagator MRI study. NeuroImage. Clinical. 2021; 32: 102863.
[99]
Trojsi F, Caiazzo G, Corbo D, Piccirillo G, Cristillo V, Femiano C, et al. Microstructural changes across different clinical milestones of disease in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. PloS One. 2015; 10: e0119045.
[100]
Cercignani M, Bozzali M, Iannucci G, Comi G, Filippi M. Magnetisation transfer ratio and mean diffusivity of normal appearing white and grey matter from patients with multiple sclerosis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. 2001; 70: 311–317.
[101]
Lipp I, Jones DK, Bells S, Sgarlata E, Foster C, Stickland R, et al. Comparing MRI metrics to quantify white matter microstructural damage in multiple sclerosis. Human Brain Mapping. 2019; 40: 2917–2932.
[102]
York EN, Meijboom R, Thrippleton MJ, Bastin ME, Kampaite A, White N, et al. Longitudinal microstructural MRI markers of demyelination and neurodegeneration in early relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: Magnetisation transfer, water diffusion and g-ratio. NeuroImage. Clinical. 2022; 36: 103228.
[103]
Schönecker S, Neuhofer C, Otto M, Ludolph A, Kassubek J, Landwehrmeyer B, et al. Atrophy in the Thalamus But Not Cerebellum Is Specific for C9orf72 FTD and ALS Patients - An Atlas-Based Volumetric MRI Study. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 2018; 10: 45.
[104]
Basaia S, Agosta F, Cividini C, Trojsi F, Riva N, Spinelli EG, et al. Structural and functional brain connectome in motor neuron diseases: A multicenter MRI study. Neurology. 2020; 95: e2552–e2564.
[105]
Cortés-Vicente E, Turon-Sans J, Gelpi E, Clarimón J, Borrego-Écija S, Dols-Icardo O, et al. Distinct Clinical Features and Outcomes in Motor Neuron Disease Associated with Behavioural Variant Frontotemporal Dementia. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders. 2018; 45: 220–231.
[106]
Huang Y, He J, Green AL, Aziz TZ, Stein JF, Wang S. Characteristics of thalamic local field potentials in patients with disorders of consciousness. Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference. 2015; 2015: 3779–3782.
[107]
Bocchetta M, Todd EG, Tse NY, Devenney EM, Tu S, Caga J, et al. Thalamic and Cerebellar Regional Involvement across the ALS-FTD Spectrum and the Effect of C9orf72. Brain Sciences. 2022; 12: 336.
[108]
Tan SY, Jones PS, Whiteside DJ, Rowe J, Rittman T. Structural and Functional Thalamic Changes in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy. BJPsych Open. 2022; 8: 75.
[109]
Li Hi Shing S, Lope J, Chipika RH, Hardiman O, Bede P. Extra-motor manifestations in post-polio syndrome (PPS): fatigue, cognitive symptoms and radiological features. Neurological Sciences: Official Journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2021; 42: 4569–4581.
[110]
Pradat PF, Bernard E, Corcia P, Couratier P, Jublanc C, Querin G, et al. The French national protocol for Kennedy’s disease (SBMA): consensus diagnostic and management recommendations. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases. 2020; 15: 90.
[111]
McKenna MC, Li Hi Shing S, Murad A, Lope J, Hardiman O, Hutchinson S, et al. Focal thalamus pathology in frontotemporal dementia: Phenotype-associated thalamic profiles. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 2022; 436: 120221.
[112]
Shen D, Hou B, Xu Y, Cui B, Peng P, Li X, et al. Brain Structural and Perfusion Signature of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis With Varying Levels of Cognitive Deficit. Frontiers in Neurology. 2018; 9: 364.
[113]
Schmahmann JD. Vascular syndromes of the thalamus. Stroke. 2003; 34: 2264–2278.
[114]
Bede P, Murad A, Hardiman O. Pathological neural networks and artificial neural networks in ALS: diagnostic classification based on pathognomonic neuroimaging features. Journal of Neurology. 2022; 269: 2440–2452.
[115]
Bede P, Murad A, Lope J, Li Hi Shing S, Finegan E, Chipika RH, et al. Phenotypic categorisation of individual subjects with motor neuron disease based on radiological disease burden patterns: A machine-learning approach. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 2022; 432: 120079.
[116]
Bede P, Iyer PM, Finegan E, Omer T, Hardiman O. Virtual brain biopsies in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Diagnostic classification based on in vivo pathological patterns. NeuroImage. Clinical. 2017; 15: 653–658.
[117]
Chipika RH, Christidi F, Finegan E, Li Hi Shing S, McKenna MC, Chang KM, et al. Amygdala pathology in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and primary lateral sclerosis. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 2020; 417: 117039.
[118]
Renga V. Brain Connectivity and Network Analysis in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Neurology Research International. 2022; 2022: 1838682.
[119]
Basaia S, Filippi M, Spinelli EG, Agosta F. White Matter Microstructure Breakdown in the Motor Neuron Disease Spectrum: Recent Advances Using Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Frontiers in Neurology. 2019; 10: 193.
[120]
Mohammadi B, Kollewe K, Cole DM, Fellbrich A, Heldmann M, Samii A, et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis affects cortical and subcortical activity underlying motor inhibition and action monitoring. Human Brain Mapping. 2015; 36: 2878–2889.
[121]
Dusek P, Hofer T, Alexander J, Roos PM, Aaseth JO. Cerebral Iron Deposition in Neurodegeneration. Biomolecules. 2022; 12: 714.

Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share
Back to top