IMR Press / JIN / Volume 23 / Issue 4 / DOI: 10.31083/j.jin2304078
Open Access Original Research
Causal Relationship between Sex Hormones and Risk of Developing Common Neurodegenerative Diseases: A Mendelian Randomization Study
Show Less
1 Department of Neurology, The First People’s Hospital of Jinzhong, 030600 Jinzhong, Shanxi, China
2 Department of Endocrinology, The First People’s Hospital of Jinzhong, 030600 Jinzhong, Shanxi, China
3 Department of Neurology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, 030001 Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
*Correspondence: neuroguo@163.com (Jun-Hong Guo)
J. Integr. Neurosci. 2024, 23(4), 78; https://doi.org/10.31083/j.jin2304078
Submitted: 15 October 2023 | Revised: 28 November 2023 | Accepted: 13 December 2023 | Published: 12 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pathogenesis of Neurodegeneration)
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Abstract

Background: Neurodegenerative diseases are a group of unexplained disorders of the central nervous system, and studies have shown that a large number of genetic and environmental factors are associated with these diseases. Since these diseases show significant gender differences in epidemiology, sex hormones are thought to be strongly associated with these diseases. In this study, we used Mendelian randomization to explore the causal relationship between sex hormones and the risk of developing neurodegenerative diseases. Methods: We obtained genetic instrumental variables for sex hormones (sex hormone-binding globulin [SHBG], estradiol levels [EL], and bioavailable testosterone [BT]) separately through the Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU) database (https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/). We analyzed the causal relationship of each with the risk of developing neurodegenerative diseases (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis [ALS], Parkinson’s disease [PD], and Alzheimer’s disease [AD]) using inverse variance weighted (IVW) in Mendelian randomization. Data were then analyzed for sensitivity. Results: BT was negatively associated with the risk of developing ALS (odds ratio [OR] = 0.794; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 0.672–0.938; p = 0.006). EL and SHBG were not associated with a risk for developing neurodegenerative diseases (ALS, PD, AD). Conclusions: Elevated BT is associated with a reduced risk of developing ALS. Further research is needed to investigate the underlying mechanisms of action for this correlation and how it can be used as a potential target of action to reduce the risk of developing ALS.

Keywords
sex hormones
neurodegenerative diseases (NDs)
mendelian randomization (MR)
causal effect
1. Introduction

Neurodegenerative diseases (NDs) are a group of chronic, multivariate, progressive diseases characterized by neuronal degeneration and necrosis. Common NDs include Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), which have been regarded as persistent and difficult to treat because of their unknown etiology, and poor prognosis. Therefore, early detection and prevention of these diseases have become a hot research topic in recent years. Epidemiologic studies suggest that there is a significant gender difference in the incidence of NDs. For example, studies have shown that two-thirds of patients with AD in the United States are women and that the prevalence of AD is twice as high in women as men [1]. Among patients with ALS, the prevalence is twice as high in men as in women [2]. For patients with PD, the prevalence is 1.5 times higher in men than in women [3]. These gender differences in disease prevalence suggest that the disease development may be related to sex hormone levels.

Sex hormones have been shown to correlate with NDs, however, the underlying biological mechanisms of these correlations are not clear [4]. Studies have shown that estrogen can reduce beta amyloid (Aβ) aggregation [5], which is at odds with estimates suggesting that AD is twice as prevalent in women as men. As men age, androgen levels decrease [6] and testosterone levels are lower in patients with AD than in normal individuals [7, 8]. This seems to imply the protective effect of androgens against AD. It has also been shown that estrogen reduces dopamine (DA) depletion in female rats [9, 10].

To date, the role of androgens in patients with PD is not clear [4]. Similarly, little research has been done on the role of sex hormones in ALS. Studies have shown that estrogen can counteract neuroinflammation [11] and that estradiol increases motor neuron survival in male ALS mice [12]. Sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) plays a crucial role in the biological action of sex hormones. SHBG is a protein synthesized and secreted by the liver, which, when it reaches the bloodstream, binds directly to sex hormones and regulates their biological activity. A biologically active sex hormone is defined as a sex hormone that is not bound to SHBG.

Although studies have shown a close association between sex hormones and NDs, these studies are not systematic and comprehensive, and due to the limitations of the experimental conditions, they often produce biased results or contradictory conclusions. This may lead to biased conclusions due to the inability of the study design to exclude reverse causality and confounding factors. In addition, traditional randomized controlled trial (RCT) experiments require a large amount of human, material, and financial resources, making it impractical to conduct RCT experiments on this issue.

Mendelian randomization (MR) has been increasingly used to infer risk factors and disease causality. Based on the stochastic nature of genetic variation during meiosis, MR uses environmentally relevant genetic variants as instrumental variables (single nucleotide polymorphisms: SNPs) to assess causality between exposure and outcome. As these genetic variants were randomly assigned at conception before disease onset, MR analyses can effectively exclude confounding factors and identify determinants of a given outcome. In the present study, we systematically evaluated the causal relationship between sex hormones and NDs by using the MR method.

2. Methods
2.1 Research Design

In the present study, we used a two-sample MR study approach to assess the causal relationship between genetic instrumental variables for sex hormones and NDs. Due to the need for two-sample randomized data analysis, exposures and outcomes were derived from non-overlapping data sources (see Supplementary Table 1). Both samples (exposure and outcome) were from European populations. The MR design had to fulfill three assumptions: (1) the instrumental variables were strongly correlated with exposure (p < 5 × 10-8); (2) the instrumental variables were not influenced by underlying factors; (3) the instrumental variables influenced the outcome only through the exposure factors (see Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Design flow chart of the present study. IVW, inverse-variance-weighted; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; SHBG, sex hormone-binding globulin; AD, Alzheimer’s disease; PD, Parkinson’s disease; ALS, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

SHBG, estradiol level (EL), and bioavailable testosterone (BT) were provided by the Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU) database (https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/). SHBG data were obtained from a European population of 214,989 participants; EL data were obtained from 13,367 European descents; and those related to BT were obtained from 382,988 European descents. Data related to NDs was also obtained from the IEU database [13]. Briefly, the PD data were derived from the European population of 2162 cases and 216,630 controls; those related to AD were derived from 39,106 cases and 46,828 controls; those related to ALS were derived from 20,806 cases and 59,804 controls. All data for this study were obtained from public databases and no additional ethical approval was required.

2.2 Selection of Genetic Instrumental Variables

Genetic instrumental variables for BT, EL, and SHBG were provided by the IEU database (https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/). In total, 124 independent SNPs associated with BT were extracted (p < 5 × 10-8), with linkage disequilibrium (LD) (r2 < 0.001) [14]. Instrumental variables (IVs) of exposure had to be screened according to the following criteria: (1) p-value level of SNPs (p < 5 ×10-8); (2) SNPs aggregation using the PLINK algorithm (r2 < 0.001): (3) Removal of SNPs showing potential pleiotropy. In addition, a total of 13 independent SNPs associated with EL were extracted (p < 5 × 10-8), and a total of 197 independent SNPs associated with SHBG were extracted (p < 5 × 10-8). Detailed information for SNPs included was presented in Supplementary Tables 2–4.

2.3 Statistical Analysis

In our study, five methods were used for MR analysis: inverse variance weighted (IVW), MR-Egger, weighted median, simple mode, and weighted mode. The IVW method was used as the primary method to analyze the causal relationship between sex hormones and NDs. The MR-Egger method includes an intercept, which could explain the average pleiotropy effect of all genetic variations [15]. In addition, to further assess whether the presence of pleiotropic IVs influences the causal estimation, we detected horizontal pleiotropy [16]. Multiple validities of genes occur when IVs affect outcomes through multiple pathways other than exposure, so we further performed Cochran statistics funnel filling, leave-one-out analysis, and MR-egger intercept tests to detect the presence of multiple validities.

Heterogeneity was detected if the p-value of the Cochran Q-test was less than 0.05. Logistic regressions based on the assessment of horizontal multinomials were also performed. To determine whether causal estimates were driven by any single SNP, leave-one-out analyses were performed, by which each exposure-related SNP was discarded in turn to repeat the IVW analysis. Due to multiple tests in this study, Bonferroni corrections were performed and the main results possessed statistical significance at p-values < 0.017 (0.050/3). As such, p-values from 0.017 to 0.050 were considered to have potential statistical significance [17]. All analyses were performed using the R program (version 4.3.1; website: https://www.r-project.org/) and the “TwoSampleMR” package (version 0.5.6; website: https://mrcieu.github.io/TwoSampleMR/index.html) [18].

3. Results
3.1 Instrumental Variables in this Study

After data harmonization, 187 SNPs for AD, 189 SNPs for PD, and 187 SNPs for ALS were selected as genetic instruments to conduct MR analyses for SHBG and NDs. To conduct MR analyses for EL and NDs, 10 SNPs for AD, 12 SNPs for PD, and 10 SNPs for ALS were selected as genetic instruments. To conduct MR analyses for BT and NDs, 105 SNPs for AD, 110 SNPs for PD, and 108 SNPs for ALS were selected as genetic instruments.

3.2 MR for BT and NDs

As shown in Table 1 and Fig. 2A, a negative causal effect of BT on ALS was identified using the IVW method (odds ratio (OR) = 0.794; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.672–0.938; p = 0.006) and the weighted median method (OR = 0.714; 95% CI: 0.538–0.947; p = 0.019). However, the simple mode analysis and weighted mode analysis did not detect a causal relationship between BT on ALS risk (Table 1). The MR-Egger method detected no directional pleiotropy for IVs (intercept = 0.006, p = 0.15). However, there are no causal relationships between BT on PD and AD risk (Table 1, Fig. 2B,C).

Table 1.Mendelian randomization analysis results for the causal associations of sex hormone (SHBG, Bioavailable testosterone) with AD, PD, and ALS.
Method SHBG Bioavailable testosterone
SNPs(N) OR 95% CI p-value SNPs(N) OR 95% CI p-value
AD
IVW 197 1.002 0.9461.061 0.932 124 0.909 0.8061.025 0.121
Weighted median 197 0.969 0.8971.047 0.429 124 0.994 0.8351.184 0.954
MR Egger 197 0.983 0.8861.090 0.746 124 1.032 0.8091.318 0.795
Simple mode 197 1.061 0.9201.224 0.411 124 0.871 0.5801.308 0.508
Weighted mode 197 0.973 0.8961.055 0.512 124 1.042 0.8511.276 0.687
PD
IVW 197 0.972 0.8301.138 0.726 124 0.804 0.5611.151 0.234
Weighted median 197 1.202 0.9011.602 0.209 124 0.585 0.3321.103 0.064
MR Egger 197 1.256 0.9541.655 0.105 124 0.523 0.2401.135 0.104
Simple mode 197 1.055 0.5811.917 0.859 124 0.565 0.1532.088 0.394
Weighted mode 197 1.159 0.8521.576 0.347 124 0.546 0.2421.231 0.148
ALS
IVW 197 1.043 0.9651.127 0.286 124 0.794 0.6720.938 0.006
Weighted median 197 1.093 0.9751.225 0.124 124 0.714 0.5380.947 0.019
MR Egger 197 1.117 0.9711.286 0.122 124 0.627 0.4390.896 0.011
Simple mode 197 0.904 0.6961.172 0.448 124 0.728 0.4011.321 0.299
Weighted mode 197 1.111 0.9701.272 0.127 124 0.728 0.5041.052 0.094

IVW, inverse variance weighted; MR, mendelian randomization; ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphisms; OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; SHBG, Sex hormone-binding globulin.

Fig. 2.

Scatter plot of the causal effects of BT on the risk of ALS (A), PD (B), and AD (C). BT, Bioavailable testosterone; ALS, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis; PD, Parkinson’s disease; AD, Alzheimer’s disease; MR, Mendelian randomization.

3.3 Estradiol and NDs

In Table 2 and Fig. 3, the IVW analysis results showed no genetically causal relationship between EL and ALS (p = 0.674), PD (p = 0.899), and AD (p = 0.828). The findings of other MR-analysis methods also showed no causal association between EL and NDs (ALS, PD, AD) (Table 2).

Table 2.Mendelian randomization analysis results for the causal associations of sex hormone (SHBG, estradiol) with, AD, PD, and ALS.
Method SHBG Estradiol
SNPs(N) OR 95% CI p-value SNPs(N) OR 95% CI p-value
AD
IVW 197 1.002 0.9461.061 0.932 13 1.006 0.9451.072 0.828
Weighted median 197 0.969 0.8971.047 0.429 13 1.025 0.9641.090 0.424
MR Egger 197 0.983 0.8861.090 0.746 13 1.037 0.8641.245 0.703
Simple mode 197 1.061 0.9201.224 0.411 13 0.964 0.8461.099 0.602
Weighted mode 197 0.973 0.8961.055 0.512 13 1.033 0.9681.103 0.348
PD
IVW 197 0.972 0.8301.138 0.726 13 0.989 0.8401.164 0.899
Weighted median 197 1.202 0.9011.602 0.209 13 0.980 0.7871.220 0.861
MR Egger 197 1.256 0.9541.655 0.105 13 1.085 0.6621.777 0.752
Simple mode 197 1.055 0.5811.917 0.859 13 1.070 0.7901.450 0.667
Weighted mode 197 1.159 0.8521.576 0.347 13 0.988 0.7811.251 0.926
ALS
IVW 197 1.043 0.9651.127 0.286 13 0.988 0.9381.041 0.674
Weighted median 197 1.093 0.9751.225 0.124 13 1.011 0.9531.072 0.704
MR Egger 197 1.117 0.9711.286 0.122 13 0.875 0.7641.001 0.060
Simple mode 197 0.904 0.6961.172 0.448 13 0.958 0.8751.050 0.374
Weighted mode 197 1.111 0.9701.272 0.127 13 1.002 0.9461.061 0.932

IVW, inverse variance weighted; MR, mendelian randomization; ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphisms; OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; SHBG, Sex hormone-binding globulin.

Fig. 3.

Scatter plot of the causal effects of EL on the risk of ALS (A), PD (B), and AD (C). EL, Estradiol levels.

3.4 SHBG and NDs

In Table 1 and Fig. 4, the IVW analysis results showed no genetically causal relationship between SHBG and ALS (p = 0.286), PD (p = 0.726), and AD (p = 0.932). The findings of other MR-analysis methods also showed no causal association between SHBG and NDs (Table 1).

Fig. 4.

Scatter plot of the causal effects of SHBG on the risk of ALS (A), PD (B), and AD (C). SHBG, Sex hormone-binding globulin.

4. Discussion

Our study systematically assessed the causal relationship between sex hormones and the risk of developing common NDs, which greatly enriches the existing research findings. Our study suggests that the level of BT is negatively associated with the risk of developing ALS, whereas EL and SHBG are not associated with the risk of developing NDs. Previous studies have shown that in patients with ALS, those with higher testosterone levels have the condition progress at a faster rate and involve the respiratory muscles [19]. At the same time, it has been shown that castration in an ALS mouse model prolongs survival, while androgen supplementation exacerbates motor neuron loss and decreases survival rates [20, 21, 22]. In contrast, blocking the androgen receptor instead leads to accelerated disease onset [23]. Our study suggests that androgens reduce the risk of ALS. The beneficial impact of BT on ALS might be attributed to its neuroprotective properties. Testosterone crosses the blood-brain barrier and exerts its direct impact on the central nervous system by activating androgen receptors or by being converted into other steroid hormones involved in improving human neurons and astrocyte survival [24, 25]. Studies also reported that testosterone could act directly on mitochondrial membranes to inhibit the generation of reactive oxygen species and increase the sirtuin-1 expression [26].

The vast majority of studies suggest that estrogen has neuroprotective effects on ALS, for example, estrogen can directly target neurons and act as an anti-apoptotic agent [27, 28]. This anti-apoptotic effect also applies to motor neurons [29]. However, in our study, estrogen was not associated with the risk of developing ALS. High estrogen levels are negatively associated with the severity of PD symptoms in women, and menopausal women are at a higher risk of developing PD [30, 31, 32]. Previous studies have reported that estrogen replacement therapy during the early postmenopausal period could mitigate the risk of PD and improve prognosis [33, 34]. Estrogen is therefore thought to have neuroprotective effects by slowing down the onset and progression of the disease [35]. However, the current study did not detect the effect of estrogen on PD.

Exactly what role androgens play in the pathogenesis of PD is not well understood so far. Some studies suggest that testosterone deficiency may be associated with PD and that testosterone therapy may improve specific symptoms in patients with PD, including improving motor function and increasing general well-being [36, 37, 38]. However, some studies also provide evidence that total testosterone levels correlate with biomarkers of PD severity, suggesting that testosterone might play a role in male vulnerability to PD [39]. Therefore, the role of testosterone in PD remains equivocal. Our study suggests that testosterone is not associated with the risk of developing PD.

AD, the most common ND, has a high prevalence and mortality rate, and there is a lack of effective clinical treatments. Previous studies have shown that both BT and estrogen are effective in reducing Aβ production and aggregation [5, 40]. Additionally, estrogen therapy has been shown to have a beneficial effect on slowing the development of AD [41, 42]. However, these studies are not reproducible [43, 44]. In contrast, our study aptly demonstrates that estrogen is not associated with the risk of developing AD. In men, circulating testosterone levels decrease progressively with age. In patients with AD, testosterone levels have been reported to be lower than in controls [7, 8]. In addition, androgens are naturally neuroprotective and support neuronal growth [45, 46]. However, it has also been shown that testosterone has no beneficial effects on cognitive function in men [47]. Our study also demonstrates that testosterone does not correlate with the risk of developing AD. Some studies have shown that SHBG is associated with the risk of developing AD [48], however, there are also studies showing that SHBG is associated with the risk of developing ALS, but not AD [49]. Therefore, it is currently difficult to reach a consensus on the causal relationship between SHBG and the risk of developing NDs, and our data suggest that there is no causal relationship between SHBG and the risk of developing NDs. Taken together, the current study failed to detect the effect of SHBG or estradiol on NDs or the effect of BT on NDs except for ALS, which was inconsistent with a majority of previous studies.

Some key points should be noted. Previous epidemiological studies are based on traditional observational design, which is susceptible to confounds or reverse causality, and thus the observed associations might be biased. Another point to note is that the current study used genome-wide association studies (GWAS) summary statistics and thus was unable to conduct sex stratification analysis, which could impact the MR results. Considering the controversial results, more studies are warranted to aid more relevant evidence.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic MR study conducted to study the relationship between sex hormones and the risk of NDs. MR studies have more advantages than traditional observational studies. For example, it can overcome the effects of confounding and reverse causation [50]. Thus, we were able to provide new insights that may contribute to a better understanding of the causal relationship between sex hormones and NDs. In addition, we used various MR analysis methods to obtain more accurate results. We used recently published GWAS data and performed multiple sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of our findings.

Although we used MR analyses, the present study has some limitations: (1) as mentioned above, we are unsure of the proportion of false questionnaire reports in the GWAS data; (2) the population included in the present study was predominantly European. Since the results of causal association analysis may also be influenced by ethnicity, further MR studies in other ethnicities should be conducted to validate the present findings; (3) there may be population sharing between the two European sample sets, leading to overuse of genetic information; (4) only publicly available GWAS data were used in our study, thus making sex stratification analysis unavailable. Indeed, the beneficial effects of estradiol in women with PD have been extensively demonstrated in previous studies [51]. The E3N study has reported that postmenopausal hormone therapy might decrease PD incidence [52]. A recent MR study also reported that a later age at menopause was associated with a decreased risk of PD in women, using the Parkinson’s Environment and Gene (PEG) and the Parkinson’s Disease in Denmark (PASIDA) datasets stratified by sex [53]. These studies highlighted the important role of sex in PD. Thereby, further investigation is warranted when future GWAS data stratified by sex is publicly available.

5. Conclusions

Our study first confirmed a causal relationship between BT and the risk of ALS. However, there no causal relationship between SHBG, EL, and NDs was detected. Therefore, the detection of BT levels may be beneficial for early prevention of ALS. Further studies on the biological mechanism of this causal relationship are needed.

Availability of Data and Materials

All the data used in this work are publicly available in the IEU database (https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/). The data generated in this work are provided in the main text or supplementary materials.

Author Contributions

JHG and QH designed the research. QH and QL were responsible for the completeness of the data analysis and the accuracy of the data analysis, wrote the manuscript, and performed the data analysis. All authors contributed to editorial changes in the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. All authors have participated sufficiently in the work and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Only publicly available summary-level GWAS data were used in this work, and thus ethics approval or consent to participate was not required.

Acknowledgment

We are grateful for the IEU database for making GWAS data publicly available.

Funding

This research was supported by Science and Technology Innovation 2030 – Major program of “Brain Science and Brain-like Research” (2021ZD0201801).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References
[1]
Mielke MM, Vemuri P, Rocca WA. Clinical epidemiology of Alzheimer’s disease: assessing sex and gender differences. Clinical Epidemiology. 2014; 6: 37–48.
[2]
McCombe PA, Henderson RD. Effects of gender in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Gender Medicine. 2010; 7: 557–570.
[3]
Shulman LM. Gender differences in Parkinson’s disease. Gender Medicine. 2007; 4: 8–18.
[4]
Vegeto E, Villa A, Della Torre S, Crippa V, Rusmini P, Cristofani R, et al. The Role of Sex and Sex Hormones in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Endocrine Reviews. 2020; 41: 273–319.
[5]
Goodenough S, Schäfer M, Behl C. Estrogen-induced cell signalling in a cellular model of Alzheimer’s disease. The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2003; 84: 301–305.
[6]
Morley JE, Kaiser FE, Perry HM, 3rd, Patrick P, Morley PM, Stauber PM, et al. Longitudinal changes in testosterone, luteinizing hormone, and follicle-stimulating hormone in healthy older men. Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental. 1997; 46: 410–413.
[7]
Rosario ER, Chang L, Head EH, Stanczyk FZ, Pike CJ. Brain levels of sex steroid hormones in men and women during normal aging and in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiology of Aging. 2011; 32: 604–613.
[8]
Rosario ER, Chang L, Stanczyk FZ, Pike CJ. Age-related testosterone depletion and the development of Alzheimer disease. JAMA. 2004; 292: 1431–1432.
[9]
Gillies GE, Murray HE, Dexter D, McArthur S. Sex dimorphisms in the neuroprotective effects of estrogen in an animal model of Parkinson’s disease. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior. 2004; 78: 513–522.
[10]
McArthur S, Murray HE, Dhankot A, Dexter DT, Gillies GE. Striatal susceptibility to a dopaminergic neurotoxin is independent of sex hormone effects on cell survival and DAT expression but is exacerbated by central aromatase inhibition. Journal of Neurochemistry. 2007; 100: 678–692.
[11]
Czlonkowska A, Ciesielska A, Gromadzka G, Kurkowska-Jastrzebska I. Estrogen and cytokines production - the possible cause of gender differences in neurological diseases. Current Pharmaceutical Design. 2005; 11: 1017–1030.
[12]
Heitzer M, Kaiser S, Kanagaratnam M, Zendedel A, Hartmann P, Beyer C, et al. Administration of 17β-Estradiol Improves Motoneuron Survival and Down-regulates Inflammasome Activation in Male SOD1(G93A) ALS Mice. Molecular Neurobiology. 2017; 54: 8429–8443.
[13]
Richardson TG, Zheng J, Gaunt TR. Computational Tools for Causal Inference in Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine. 2021; 11: a039248.
[14]
Kunkle BW, Grenier-Boley B, Sims R, Bis JC, Damotte V, Naj AC, et al. Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Abeta, tau, immunity and lipid processing. Nature Genetics. 2019; 51: 414–430.
[15]
Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Burgess S. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2015; 44: 512–525.
[16]
Verbanck M, Chen CY, Neale B, Do R. Detection of widespread horizontal pleiotropy in causal relationships inferred from Mendelian randomization between complex traits and diseases. Nature Genetics. 2018; 50: 693–698.
[17]
Xu H, Ling Y, Jiang H, Li Y, Jiang M. Osteoarthritis, coronary artery disease, and myocardial infarction: A mendelian randomization study. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2022; 9: 892742.
[18]
Hemani G, Zheng J, Elsworth B, Wade KH, Haberland V, Baird D, et al. The MR-Base platform supports systematic causal inference across the human phenome. eLife. 2018; 7: e34408.
[19]
Gargiulo-Monachelli GM, Sivori M, Meyer M, Sica REP, De Nicola AF, Gonzalez-Deniselle MC. Circulating gonadal and adrenal steroids in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: possible markers of susceptibility and outcome. Hormone and Metabolic Research. 2014; 46: 433–439.
[20]
Galbiati M, Onesto E, Zito A, Crippa V, Rusmini P, Mariotti R, et al. The anabolic/androgenic steroid nandrolone exacerbates gene expression modifications induced by mutant SOD1 in muscles of mice models of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Pharmacological Research. 2012; 65: 221–230.
[21]
Galbiati M, Crippa V, Rusmini P, Cristofani R, Cicardi ME, Giorgetti E, et al. ALS-related misfolded protein management in motor neurons and muscle cells. Neurochemistry International. 2014; 79: 70–78.
[22]
Aggarwal T, Polanco MJ, Scaramuzzino C, Rocchi A, Milioto C, Emionite L, et al. Androgens affect muscle, motor neuron, and survival in a mouse model of SOD1-related amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurobiology of Aging. 2014; 35: 1929–1938.
[23]
McLeod VM, Lau CL, Chiam MDF, Rupasinghe TW, Roessner U, Djouma E, et al. Androgen receptor antagonism accelerates disease onset in the SOD1G93A mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. British Journal of Pharmacology. 2019; 176: 2111–2130.
[24]
Proaño B, Casani-Cubel J, Benlloch M, Rodriguez-Mateos A, Navarro-Illana E, Lajara-Romance JM, et al. Is Dutasteride a Therapeutic Alternative for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis? Biomedicines. 2022; 10: 2084.
[25]
Meydan S, Kus I, Tas U, Ogeturk M, Sancakdar E, Dabak DO, et al. Effects of testosterone on orchiectomy-induced oxidative damage in the rat hippocampus. Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy. 2010; 40: 281–285.
[26]
Son SW, Lee JS, Kim HG, Kim DW, Ahn YC, Son CG. Testosterone depletion increases the susceptibility of brain tissue to oxidative damage in a restraint stress mouse model. Journal of Neurochemistry. 2016; 136: 106–117.
[27]
Al Sweidi S, Sánchez MG, Bourque M, Morissette M, Dluzen D, Di Paolo T. Oestrogen receptors and signalling pathways: implications for neuroprotective effects of sex steroids in Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Neuroendocrinology. 2012; 24: 48–61.
[28]
Meda C, Vegeto E, Pollio G, Ciana P, Patrone C, Pellicciari C, et al. Oestrogen prevention of neural cell death correlates with decreased expression of mRNA for the pro-apoptotic protein nip-2. Journal of Neuroendocrinology. 2000; 12: 1051–1059.
[29]
Bame M, Pentiak PA, Needleman R, Brusilow WSA. Effect of sex on lifespan, disease progression, and the response to methionine sulfoximine in the SOD1 G93A mouse model for ALS. Gender Medicine. 2012; 9: 524–535.
[30]
Quinn NP, Marsden CD. Menstrual-related fluctuations in Parkinson’s disease. Movement Disorders: Official Journal of the Movement Disorder Society. 1986; 1: 85–87.
[31]
Ragonese P, D’Amelio M, Savettieri G. Implications for estrogens in Parkinson’s disease: an epidemiological approach. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2006; 1089: 373–382.
[32]
Rocca WA, Bower JH, Maraganore DM, Ahlskog JE, Grossardt BR, de Andrade M, et al. Increased risk of parkinsonism in women who underwent oophorectomy before menopause. Neurology. 2008; 70: 200–209.
[33]
Tsang KL, Ho SL, Lo SK. Estrogen improves motor disability in parkinsonian postmenopausal women with motor fluctuations. Neurology. 2000; 54: 2292–2298.
[34]
Nicoletti A, Arabia G, Pugliese P, Nicoletti G, Torchia G, Condino F, et al. Hormonal replacement therapy in women with Parkinson disease and levodopa-induced dyskinesia: a crossover trial. Clinical Neuropharmacology. 2007; 30: 276–280.
[35]
Labandeira-Garcia JL, Rodriguez-Perez AI, Valenzuela R, Costa-Besada MA, Guerra MJ. Menopause and Parkinson’s disease. Interaction between estrogens and brain renin-angiotensin system in dopaminergic degeneration. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology. 2016; 43: 44–59.
[36]
Kenangil G, Orken DN, Ur E, Forta H, Celik M. The relation of testosterone levels with fatigue and apathy in Parkinson’s disease. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. 2009; 111: 412–414.
[37]
Mitchell E, Thomas D, Burnet R. Testosterone improves motor function in Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience: Official Journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia. 2006; 13: 133–136.
[38]
Okun MS, Walter BL, McDonald WM, Tenover JL, Green J, Juncos JL, et al. Beneficial effects of testosterone replacement for the nonmotor symptoms of Parkinson disease. Archives of Neurology. 2002; 59: 1750–1753.
[39]
Bovenzi R, Sancesario GM, Conti M, Grillo P, Cerroni R, Bissacco J, et al. Sex hormones differentially contribute to Parkinson disease in males: A multimodal biomarker study. European Journal of Neurology. 2023; 30: 1983–1990.
[40]
Jiang T, Chang RCC, Rosenmann H, Yu JT. Advances in Alzheimer’s disease: from bench to bedside. BioMed Research International. 2015; 2015: 202676.
[41]
Zandi PP, Carlson MC, Plassman BL, Welsh-Bohmer KA, Mayer LS, Steffens DC, et al. Hormone replacement therapy and incidence of Alzheimer disease in older women: the Cache County Study. JAMA. 2002; 288: 2123–2129.
[42]
Tang MX, Jacobs D, Stern Y, Marder K, Schofield P, Gurland B, et al. Effect of oestrogen during menopause on risk and age at onset of Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet (London, England). 1996; 348: 429–432.
[43]
Almeida S, Fiegenbaum M, de Andrade FM, Osório-Wender MC, Hutz MH. ESR1 and APOE gene polymorphisms, serum lipids, and hormonal replacement therapy. Maturitas. 2006; 54: 119–126.
[44]
Yaffe K. Estrogens, selective estrogen receptor modulators, and dementia: what is the evidence? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2001; 949: 215–222.
[45]
Brännvall K, Bogdanovic N, Korhonen L, Lindholm D. 19-Nortestosterone influences neural stem cell proliferation and neurogenesis in the rat brain. The European Journal of Neuroscience. 2005; 21: 871–878.
[46]
Cooke BM, Woolley CS. Gonadal hormone modulation of dendrites in the mammalian CNS. Journal of Neurobiology. 2005; 64: 34–46.
[47]
Buskbjerg CR, Gravholt CH, Dalby HR, Amidi A, Zachariae R. Testosterone Supplementation and Cognitive Functioning in Men-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of the Endocrine Society. 2019; 3: 1465–1484.
[48]
Xu J, Xia LL, Song N, Chen SD, Wang G. Testosterone, Estradiol, and Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Meta-Analysis. Current Alzheimer Research. 2016; 13: 215–222.
[49]
Ou YN, Yang L, Wu BS, Tan L, Yu JT. Causal effects of serum sex hormone binding protein levels on the risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a mendelian randomization study. Annals of Translational Medicine. 2022; 10: 1054.
[50]
Smith GD, Ebrahim S. ‘Mendelian randomization’: can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease? International Journal of Epidemiology. 2003; 32: 1–22.
[51]
Cerri S, Mus L, Blandini F. Parkinson’s Disease in Women and Men: What’s the Difference? Journal of Parkinson’s Disease. 2019; 9: 501–515.
[52]
Pesce G, Artaud F, Roze E, Degaey I, Portugal B, Nguyen TTH, et al. Reproductive characteristics, use of exogenous hormones and Parkinson disease in women from the E3N study. Brain: a Journal of Neurology. 2023; 146: 2535–2546.
[53]
Kusters CDJ, Paul KC, Duarte Folle A, Keener AM, Bronstein JM, Bertram L, et al. Increased Menopausal Age Reduces the Risk of Parkinson’s Disease: A Mendelian Randomization Approach. Movement Disorders: Official Journal of the Movement Disorder Society. 2021; 36: 2264–2272.

Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share
Back to top