IMR Press / RCM / Volume 23 / Issue 12 / DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2312397
Open Access Systematic Review
Comparison of Myocardial Injury and Inflammation Biomarkers and Their Impact on Recurrence after Cryoballoon and Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Show Less
1 Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Key Laboratory of Integrative Chinese and Western Medicine for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Circulatory Diseases of Zhejiang Province, 310006 Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
2 Department of Cardiology, Qingdao Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Qingdao Hiser Hospital), 266000 Qingdao, Shandong, China
3 The First College of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, 310006 Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
4 Department of Geriatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), 310006 Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
*Correspondence: maoweilw@163.com (Wei Mao); swangxiao1215@163.com (Xiao Wang)
These authors contributed equally.
Academic Editors: Giuseppe Santarpino and Giuseppe Nasso
Rev. Cardiovasc. Med. 2022, 23(12), 397; https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2312397
Submitted: 16 August 2022 | Revised: 16 September 2022 | Accepted: 8 October 2022 | Published: 7 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights in Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation)
Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Abstract

Background: Biomarkers of myocardial injury and inflammation were found to be different after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) and cryoballoon ablation (CBA) for atrial fibrillation (AF); however, the results are currently controversial. This study was aimed to systematically compare the differences in myocardial injury and inflammation biomarkers after RFCA and CBA procedures and to investigate their impact on AF recurrence. Methods: Databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and China Biology Medicine (CBM), were systematically searched from their date of inception to May 2022. The primary outcomes of interest were the differences in myocardial injury and inflammation biomarkers after CBA and RFCA procedures for AF patients, and the impact of the biomarkers on AF recurrence. Secondary outcomes included the total ablation time, the procedure duration and the freedom from atrial tachycardia (AT). Results: Eighteen studies with a total of 1807 patients were finally enrolled. CBA treatment was associated with significantly greater increases in troponin I (TNI) levels (weighted mean difference [WMD] = 3.13 ug/L, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.43–3.64) both at 4–6 h (WMD = 3.94 ug/L), 24 h (WMD = 4.23 ug/L), 48 h (WMD = 2.14 ug/L) and 72 h (WMD = 0.56 ug/L), and also creatine kinade MB fraction (CK-MB) levels at 4–6 h (WMD = 33.21 U/L), 24 h (WMD = 35.84 U/L) and 48 h (WMD = 4.62 U/L), while RFCA treatment was associated with greater increases in postablation C-reactive protein (CRP) levels both at 48 h (WMD = –9.32 mg/L) and 72 h (WMD = –10.90 mg/L). The CBA and RFCA treatments had comparable rates of freedom from AT (74.5% vs. 75.2%, RR = 1.08). The CRP levels were significantly higher in patients with early recurrence of AF (ERAF) than in those without ERAF after RFCA treatment (WMD = 3.415 mg/L). Conclusions: The time-course patterns of postablation myocardial injury and inflammation biomarkers are different between RFCA and CBA procedures. The lower postprocedural elevation of myocardial injury biomarkers and the increased CRP levels may be predictive factors for ERAF. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42021278564.

Keywords
atrial fibrillation
cryoballoon ablation
radiofrequency ablation
myocardial injury biomarkers
inflammation biomarkers
meta-analysis
Funding
2022ZB104/Zhejiang Provincial Science and Technology Project of Traditional Chinese Medicine
2021JKZDZC03/Research Project of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University
2021Q056/Shandong Traditional Chinese Medicine Science and Technology Project
Figures
Fig. 1.
Share
Back to top