IMR Press / CEOG / Volume 51 / Issue 3 / DOI: 10.31083/j.ceog5103060
Open Access Original Research
Postpartum Haemorrhage Risk Prediction Model Developed by Machine Learning Algorithms: A Single-Centre Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Data
Show Less
1 Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Third Affiliated Hospital of Shanghai University/Wenzhou Third Clinical Institute Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University/Wenzhou People’s Hospital, 325000 Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
*Correspondence: zjzhp@126.com (Hongping Zhang); 1078811253@qq.com (Yanjun Hu)
Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol. 2024, 51(3), 60; https://doi.org/10.31083/j.ceog5103060
Submitted: 1 November 2023 | Revised: 13 December 2023 | Accepted: 25 December 2023 | Published: 6 March 2024
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Abstract

Background: Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is a serious complication and a cause of maternal mortality after delivery. This study used machine learning algorithms and new feature selection methods to build an efficient PPH risk prediction model and provided new ideas and reference methods for PPH risk management. Methods: The clinical data of women who gave birth at Wenzhou People’s Hospital from 1 January 2021, to 30 March 2022, were retrospectively analysed, and the women were divided into a high haemorrhage group (337 patients) and a low haemorrhage group (431 patients) based on the amount of blood loss. Machine learning algorithms were used to identify the features associated with postpartum haemorrhage from multiple clinical variables using feature selection methods, such as recursive feature elimination (RFE), recursive feature elimination with cross-validation (RFECV), and SelectKBest, and to establish prediction models. Results: For all women, the features associated with postpartum haemorrhage were ‘age’, ‘newborn weight’, ‘gestational week’, ‘perineal laceration’, and ‘caesarean section’. The prediction model established by the random forest classifier performed best, with an F1 score of 0.73 and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.84. For women who underwent caesarean section or had a vaginal delivery, the features associated with postpartum haemorrhage risk were different. The risk factors for postpartum haemorrhage in women who underwent caesarean section were ‘age’, ‘parity’, ‘preterm birth’, and ‘placenta previa’. The prediction model established by the random forest classifier performed best, with an F1 value of 0.96 and an AUC of 0.95. The risk factors for postpartum haemorrhage in women with vaginal delivery were ‘age’, ‘parity’, ‘gestational week’, ‘diabetes’, ‘assisted reproduction’, ‘hypertension (preeclampsia)’, and ‘multiple pregnancy’. The prediction model established by the AdaBoost classifier performed best, with an F1 value of 0.65 and an AUC of 0.76. Conclusions: Machine learning algorithms can effectively identify the features associated with postpartum haemorrhage risk from clinical variables and establish accurate prediction models, offering a novel approach for clinicians to assess the risk of and prevent postpartum haemorrhage.

Keywords
postpartum haemorrhage
machine learning
risk prediction
feature selection
Funding
2021KY1080/Health Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province
2024KY1629/Health Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province
ZY2021025/Wenzhou Major Science and Technology Innovation Project
Y2020080/Wenzhou Basic Scientific Research Project
Figures
Fig. 1.
Share
Back to top