IMR Press / RCM / Volume 25 / Issue 3 / DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2503103
Open Access Original Research
Impact of Classical Risk Factors on Subclinical Carotid Atherosclerosis Progression: Insights from a Non-Diabetic Cohort
Show Less
1 Department of Angiology, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice and East Slovak Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, 040 11 Košice, Slovakia
2 4th Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice and Louis Pasteur University Hospital, 041 90 Košice, Slovakia
3 Department of Health Psychology and Research Methodology, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice, 040 11 Košice, Slovakia
4 Department of Cardiac Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice and East Slovak Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, 040 11 Košice, Slovakia
5 Department of Angiology, Cardiocentrum AGEL Košice-Šaca, 040 15 Košice, Slovakia
6 Faculty of Aeronautics, Technical University of Košice, 041 21 Košice, Slovakia
*Correspondence: eva.szaboova@upjs.sk (Eva Szabóová)
Rev. Cardiovasc. Med. 2024, 25(3), 103; https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2503103
Submitted: 31 August 2023 | Revised: 28 November 2023 | Accepted: 5 December 2023 | Published: 12 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research of Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease)
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Abstract

Background: Several markers have been proposed for the detection and progression of subclinical atherosclerosis. We aimed to analyse the impact of classical risk factors on the presence and short-term progression of subclinical carotid atherosclerosis in a non-diabetic, primary prevention cohort. Methods: This analysis included participants with completed visits at baseline and at 5-year follow-up (N = 141; 56.7% females, 43.3% males; aged 49.6 ± 4.7 years). Clinical and laboratory parameters, risk profiles, carotid artery intima-media thickness (CIMT) and plaque presence were analysed. Results: There was a significant progression in mean CIMT (0.54 ± 0.09 mm–0.62 ± 0.10 mm; p < 0.001), prevalence of carotid plaque (4.8%–17.9%; p < 0.001) and age- and sex-adjusted abnormal CIMT (52.9%–78.8%; p < 0.001) at the end of follow-up, compared to baseline. In multivariate regression analysis, among the classical risk factors, their number, metabolic syndrome and SCORE (Systematic Coronary Risk Estimation) risk only the number of risk factors showed an independent and significant impact on the occurrence of a carotid plaque (Exp(B) = 1.71; p = 0.017) and 5-year CIMT progression. Conclusions: During a short follow-up, the significant progression of subclinical atherosclerosis was confirmed. The number of risk factors predicted the occurrence of carotid plaques and CIMT progression. The high prevalence and short-term progression of subclinical carotid atherosclerosis underly the rationale for its screening in personalized cardiovascular risk stratification in asymptomatic middle-aged subjects over 50 years old, at low-to moderate cardiovascular risk, particularly with several risk factors.

Keywords
subclinical atherosclerosis
atherosclerotic plaque
intima-media thickness
cardiovascular risk factors
risk score
Share
Back to top